Woman attacked by conservatives for daring to ask Mitt Romney a question

Status
Not open for further replies.

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,181
32,592
136
Her name is Katheryn Fenton. Her question concerning Romney's support of equal pay for women elicited the "binders full of women" quote. Romney chose to go down that path instead of answering her question

Well the right wing went nuts, not attacking her question and it's premise but attacking her personally.

The article, published anonymously, alleged that Katherine Fenton's Twitter account "reveals that purple Joose is her choice to get blackout drunk and she has a history of getting wet at happy hour." The article also highlights sexually suggestive messages Fenton allegedly sent from her Twitter account

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zach-stafford/katherine-fenton_b_1979877.html

I guess when you are bereft of ideas break out the personal attacks, especialy against private citizens.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Because famous conservatives attacking private citizens personally seems to be a pattern. Remember Sandra Fluke?

You do realize that Sandra Fluke was an activist right?

And attended a university specifically to make trouble?

Now given that stupidity of the question asked by the woman I don't really cared if she gets called out.

When is Obama going to fix the prison gender gap? :hmm:
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
What are the purposes of these threads? Both sides have dicks in them.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But exactly the point and exactly the rub, which side has more irrational and violent Dicks and Cunts that characterize their political party. A question that requires relative quantification and not a cop out.

As the buckshot24 answer seems to boil down to two wrongs make one right to be to be collective assholes.
 

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
But exactly the point and exactly the rub, which side has more irrational and violent Dicks and Cunts that characterize their political party. A question that requires relative quantification and not a cop out.
Open a thread about it then.
As the buckshot24 answer seems to boil down to two wrongs make one right to be to be collective assholes.
No, you're wrong.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Really? OP made things sound so bad I thought Fox news did this. But no, it was some fairly new far right hack website. Is this all you got?

http://freebeacon.com/party-girl-de...-joose-hates-cops-and-women-who-watch-sports/

You need to do your homework. The parent organization of the Beacon is just another face on the right wing slime machine-

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/center_for_american_freedom

She asked Mitt a question they didn't like, an honest & pertinent question, gets slimed for her trouble by an "anonymous" study in a right wing mouthpiece...

Stay Classy, Repubs.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
At least they did not call her an oreo or a house slave because she is not blindly doing what the party wants her to do...

EDIT: Wait, my bad. That is what democrats call blacks who do not blindly follow the democratic party and instead choose to think for themselves. I got confused when someone said something about classy.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,646
9,953
136
Romney practically ignored her question, and it wasn't a big deal.

Relevance not found, but people should leave her the !@#$ alone.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
At least they did not call her an oreo or a house slave because she is not blindly doing what the party wants her to do...

EDIT: Wait, my bad. That is what democrats call blacks who do not blindly follow the democratic party and instead choose to think for themselves. I got confused when someone said something about classy.

Perhaps you'd care to quote some well funded "Liberal" source on that slander... you know, one that's trying to make a name for itself like the Free Beacon... Or some source that has the following of, say, El Rushbo...

Basically, you and the rest assert that anybody, any private citizen who merely asks a question you don't want to hear becomes fair game for attack by powerful interests. The message of intimidation is obvious- STFU.

It's really quite shameful, revealing a depth of desperation & depravity you often exemplify.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.