• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

WOAH: Navy publishes first photos of damaged sub

that article also says more about how it happened. The undersea mountain was not on the charts they were using.
 
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: Indolent
that article also says more about how it happened. The undersea mountain was not on the charts they were using.

It is now
One would have thought that sonar could detect undersea mountains.

Active sonar (think thing that could find it) is rarely if ever used. It will give away your position (then what is the use of a submarine?)
 
Originally posted by: pyonir
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
The inner hull was not penetrated.

:Q

That amazes me.

It really makes you wonder about the survivability of a sub against a torpedo attack, though, huh? "Common knowledge" has had it that a single torpedo is sufficient to sink anything.

But....I mean, if it can handle driving straight into a mountain at 30 knots.....

And, even more amazingly, not only NOT SINK, but recall that it managed to surface and drive back to port under its own power!
 
Originally posted by: dderidex
Originally posted by: pyonir
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
The inner hull was not penetrated.

:Q

That amazes me.

It really makes you wonder about the survivability of a sub against a torpedo attack, though, huh? "Common knowledge" has had it that a single torpedo is sufficient to sink anything.

But....I mean, if it can handle driving straight into a mountain at 30 knots.....

And, even more amazingly, not only NOT SINK, but recall that it managed to surface and drive back to port under its own power!

I think if you read Hunt for Red Oktober, that seems to give a good spiel on sub warfare.
 
Originally posted by: dderidex
Originally posted by: pyonir
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
The inner hull was not penetrated.

:Q

That amazes me.

It really makes you wonder about the survivability of a sub against a torpedo attack, though, huh? "Common knowledge" has had it that a single torpedo is sufficient to sink anything.

But....I mean, if it can handle driving straight into a mountain at 30 knots.....

And, even more amazingly, not only NOT SINK, but recall that it managed to surface and drive back to port under its own power!

except a torpedo is going to be going the submarine speed + the torpedo speed

while being manufactured to punch a hole into a submarine and have a large explosive in it. it is probably quite unlike running into a mountain of wet sand. It doesn't make me wonder about the survivability against a torpedo attack; it makes me wonder about the survivability of it hitting a rock formation that they didn't know about.
 
Some bigger pictures from the official Navy site:

1

2

🙁
rose.gif


Bump...found even higher res pics.
 
Originally posted by: dderidex
Originally posted by: pyonir
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
The inner hull was not penetrated.

:Q

That amazes me.

It really makes you wonder about the survivability of a sub against a torpedo attack, though, huh? "Common knowledge" has had it that a single torpedo is sufficient to sink anything.

But....I mean, if it can handle driving straight into a mountain at 30 knots.....

And, even more amazingly, not only NOT SINK, but recall that it managed to surface and drive back to port under its own power!

power of the nukes baby
 
Back
Top