• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wireless Bridge to 4G LTE Box

owensdj

Golden Member
I have a few machines that connect over wifi to a 4G LTE box for Internet access. Two of them are desktop machines with wireless NICs that need to connect to each other, so I'd like to connect them together using wired ethernet for reliability and speed reasons. As it is now if the 4G LTE box isn't working they lose their IP addresses and can't network together.

I thought about plugging the two desktop computers into a Linksys E1200 wireless router in bridge mode that connects to the 4G LTE box over wifi. If I did that would the two desktop machines use the switch to communicate with each other, or would the network traffic between them go over wifi anyway?
 
remove the wireless NICs and the only way for them to connect will be through the switch

iirc, if the router is in bridge mode it will only be passing the IPs through from the LTE box, so you don't want it in bridge mode. you want it routing.
 
ElFenix, yes I plan to remove the wireless NICs and only use the desktop machines' wired ethernet port connected to the switch.

OK if I keep the router in routing mode, will it be giving IP addresses to the desktop machines instead of the LTE box? Will the IP addresses for the desktop machines be on a different subnet? Will the desktop machines still have Internet access?

My understanding was that the router wouldn't be able to connect to the LTE box wirelessly unless it was in bridge mode.
 
Wow... you're using a 4G LTE modem for their office internet access?

Do they have some special unlimited data plan for businesses that I'm not aware of? I could only imagine how expensive that would get with a 10 GB cap and $10 for each additional GB.
 
4g has not yet come to my area, but I do have extensive experience with networking 3G devices wireless devices together. And my same plan would work equally well with Verizon 4G, aka LTE.

My set up is follows, as my wife and I have a 1 desktop computer each, and also one wirelessly capable laptops each. With the 3G Verizon MIFI 2200, I can network both desktops together using Windows ICS, a crossover cable between both desktop's enternet ports, and my MIFI 2200 (or any other 3G Versizon modem for that matter ) connected to the USB port of the host computer on the ICS network. AND I GET EXCELLENT ROCK STEADY results. And anyone who has had problems with ICS is probably not setting up a Static DNS address for the client computer of the ICS network. Of course, in that mode, the MIFI 2200 does nothing to get wireless access
for my laptops.

But if I want to network in all 4 computers (2 desktops and 2 laptops ) again my MIFI 2200 modem is a two mode device, as its becomes a two trick pony. Because if I plug the MIFI 2200 into its AC battery charger to keep it charged or just leave it free standing, it suddenly becomes a combination wireless 3G signal receiver/ wireless G modem able to to power up to five wireless devices using any OS. Which feeds wireless signal to my two laptops no problem, but does nothing to feed internet to my two desktops. Until I bought two cheap $10.00 USB devices to make my desktop computers capable of receiving a wireless signal. And that works for me too. Especially on patch Tuesday when I have to do the windows updates on all 4 Computers. I should also note if I want to take the show on the road, I grab one laptop and my MIFI 2200 modem and leave. Of course the other 3 computers at home lose their internet, but if my wife is gone too, there is no one left in the house to use the other 3 computers.

Two other things to say, the 4G Verizon equivalent to my MIFI 2200 3G modem is the 4510L. The second thing to say, is that you could do similar 3G or 4G things with a router, but not just any router, it has to be one specifically designed for 3G or 4G data signals. And while regular DSL or cable modems routers are fairly cheap, 3G and 4G routers, cost about 3 times more than DSL or cable routers cousins.

As for the 5 and 10 GB data cap for month, I agree it really sucks and is a rip off, but a lot of folks like me in rural areas, have no other hardwired broadband internet options. Its either dial up, or 3G or 4G data broadband. Other than even more expensive and slower satellite. And satellite is the sometimes the only remaining broadband option for people in rural areas that can't get any cell phone access at their house either.
 
Last edited:
ElFenix, yes I plan to remove the wireless NICs and only use the desktop machines' wired ethernet port connected to the switch.

OK if I keep the router in routing mode, will it be giving IP addresses to the desktop machines instead of the LTE box? Will the IP addresses for the desktop machines be on a different subnet? Will the desktop machines still have Internet access?

My understanding was that the router wouldn't be able to connect to the LTE box wirelessly unless it was in bridge mode.

oh so you have to use wireless as WAN for the router?

yeah i'm not sure how to do that.

edit: some routers can use the USB port for WAN, so if you had a USB LTE device that might work

edit2: if you use a crossover cable between the computers you might be able to use windows networking through that and still use wifi from the LTE device for internet.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top