feredim-924
Member
Anyone else pumped for it? We're talking 1300 mb/s
Nope, because it's not going to help anyone. Doesn't address the two biggest issues with wireless: frequency congestion and simplex communication.
We need antennae that are capable of sending and receiving at the same time and we need more frequency.
Exactly what the fuck are you talking about? Since when has there a problem with what you are saying?
sigh, no link so nobody has any idea what the fuck op is talking about. not very exciting
im guessing he means 802.11ac
which supposedly the 1st gen is 1300mbs and it will potentially go up to 5.8gbs or something.
ill wait till the kinks are worked out of the 5gbs products then i might think of buying into it. still a couple few years away.
nothing to freak out about yet
YES THANK YOU, there can only be one wireless AC(as if there is such a thing as wireless air conditioning lmao)... Trendnet and Buffalo showed off alot when they unveiled their prototypes
Anyone else pumped for it? We're talking 1300 mb/s
YES THANK YOU, there can only be one wireless AC(as if there is such a thing as wireless air conditioning lmao)... Trendnet and Buffalo showed off alot when they unveiled their prototypes
Pointless. Most networks are already faster than the hard drives the data is being read/written on. Once again and as always, archaic 1950s data storage using mechanical read/write heads is the limit, not networks or CPUs.