Wireless AC coming soon!!!

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,034
1
81
Nope, because it's not going to help anyone. Doesn't address the two biggest issues with wireless: frequency congestion and simplex communication.

We need antennae that are capable of sending and receiving at the same time and we need more frequency.
 

feredim-924

Member
Mar 9, 2012
25
0
0
Nope, because it's not going to help anyone. Doesn't address the two biggest issues with wireless: frequency congestion and simplex communication.

We need antennae that are capable of sending and receiving at the same time and we need more frequency.

Exactly what are you talking about? Since when has there a problem with what you are saying?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

wirednuts

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2007
7,121
4
0
sigh, no link so nobody has any idea what the fuck op is talking about. not very exciting

im guessing he means 802.11ac

which supposedly the 1st gen is 1300mbs and it will potentially go up to 5.8gbs or something.

ill wait till the kinks are worked out of the 5gbs products then i might think of buying into it. still a couple few years away.

nothing to freak out about yet
 

feredim-924

Member
Mar 9, 2012
25
0
0
sigh, no link so nobody has any idea what the fuck op is talking about. not very exciting

im guessing he means 802.11ac

which supposedly the 1st gen is 1300mbs and it will potentially go up to 5.8gbs or something.

ill wait till the kinks are worked out of the 5gbs products then i might think of buying into it. still a couple few years away.

nothing to freak out about yet

YES THANK YOU, there can only be one wireless AC(as if there is such a thing as wireless air conditioning lmao)... Trendnet and Buffalo showed off alot when they unveiled their prototypes
 

billyb0b

Golden Member
Nov 8, 2009
1,270
5
81
YES THANK YOU, there can only be one wireless AC(as if there is such a thing as wireless air conditioning lmao)... Trendnet and Buffalo showed off alot when they unveiled their prototypes


ahhh there can be only one wireless ac.....there can also be only one cornholio

****Pic deleted by Mod.

Irrelevant Pics are OK in OT and the like, not in a technical forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,034
1
81
The problem is that 802.11ac, while "faster," doesn't resolve the speed issues that wireless networking has. You can increase the symbol rate all day long and play around with different modulation schemes to your heart's content, but it's still for naught because it's still plagued by being a simplex connection with far too little frequency bandwidth.
 

JackMDS

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 25, 1999
29,484
391
126
802.11n, the 2.4GHz part has only 3 separate (none overlapping channels 1 6 11).

Thus the MIMO affect that the 802.11n is based upon is restricted to one double channel MIMO combo.

In contrast 802.11a (5Ghz) has many more sparate channels so more channels can be combined to go up to few Gigabits of bandwidth.

So ac would be able to create more than just one MIMO doubler by using more pairs of separate channels.

The draw back.

1. 5GHz does not propagate as well as 2.4GHz

2. If the same channles would be MIMOed by every one the singal to noise ratio in a congested enviroment full of 801.11ac would be terrible.

As usually with Wireless depending on the environment, some users will benefit from the "ac" arrangement, some would get worse Wireless, and for many it probably would not be different from the current Wireless network that they have.



:cool:
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Pointless. Most networks are already faster than the hard drives the data is being read/written on. Once again and as always, archaic 1950s data storage using mechanical read/write heads is the limit, not networks or CPUs.
 
Last edited:

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,541
10,167
126
YES THANK YOU, there can only be one wireless AC(as if there is such a thing as wireless air conditioning lmao)... Trendnet and Buffalo showed off alot when they unveiled their prototypes

Actually, there has been talk of wireless AC power delivery being developed. Therefore your topic title was ambiguous.
 

gigahertz20

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2007
1,118
2
81
Pointless. Most networks are already faster than the hard drives the data is being read/written on. Once again and as always, archaic 1950s data storage using mechanical read/write heads is the limit, not networks or CPUs.

Can't wait until the day SSD's are cheap as hard drives. :awe:
 

mammador

Platinum Member
Dec 9, 2010
2,120
1
76
Coming to think of it, I can see only enterprises getting this new wifi standard. I can't see how a home user needs over a gigabit of wifi Layer 1 connectivity. My local ISP's highest package is 100Mb, and even then the average user doesn't need that much bandwidth.