Hey guys, I have a non-wireless printer connected to a switch which is connected to the switch on the back of a Comcast router. The PC is connected to the same router but via wireless. Now, the wireless was set to a different subnet so I could not get the PC to print to the printer. I logged on to the router and changed the wireless subnet to the same subnet that was on the switch on the back of the router.
So, the subnet coming out of the switch on the back of the Comcast router was 192.168.0.x and now the wireless subnet is also 192.168.0.x. The PC and the printer should now be on the same subnet, right? Well, I would have thought so but apparently it is considered two separate subnets because when I try to ping the printers IP from the PC I get destination host unreachable.
Is it because the subnets are coming out of two separate network interfaces even though its the same device?
I thought perhaps I could just get a small WAP and connect it via ethernet to the same switch the printer is on and then connect the PC wirelessly to that. Would that allow me to finally be on the same subnet?
(I realize running a network cable to the PC would also work but the person does not want that.)
So, the subnet coming out of the switch on the back of the Comcast router was 192.168.0.x and now the wireless subnet is also 192.168.0.x. The PC and the printer should now be on the same subnet, right? Well, I would have thought so but apparently it is considered two separate subnets because when I try to ping the printers IP from the PC I get destination host unreachable.
Is it because the subnets are coming out of two separate network interfaces even though its the same device?
I thought perhaps I could just get a small WAP and connect it via ethernet to the same switch the printer is on and then connect the PC wirelessly to that. Would that allow me to finally be on the same subnet?
(I realize running a network cable to the PC would also work but the person does not want that.)