On my notebook (256 MB RAM), the explorer.exe is currently taking about 23 megabytes and just a few percent of CPU time. Has anyone noticed how much more responsive and stable explorer.exe is under WinXP than under Win2K? At least it is on every machine here. Microsoft has definitely done some major work on the role of explorer.exe in the OS, and I think it was effort well-spent. Perhaps that means it's just going to take a larger chunk of memory?
Regards,
Jim