• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Winona gets probation???

what's so crazy...

a.) did anyone expect her to get prison time? haha yea right

b.) is it that unusual to not get prison time for a minor first offense? most stores don't even prosecute and settle these things domestically.
 
It's what she should have gotten. If this had been anyone but a celebrity, you wouldn't have heard a peep about it, and the person convicted would have been halfway through their community service hours by now.

 
Originally posted by: tarheelmm
This is crazy...

link

Why? She had no prior convictions. She has to pay $10K in fines AND perform 480 hours of community service.

She probably got a MORE stiff sentence than most first-timers would get.
 
Ummm, she stole over $5000 worth of merchandise. if that was anyone else it would have been something more then probation, IMO.
 
Originally posted by: tarheelmm
Ummm, she stole over $5000 worth of merchandise. if that was anyone else it would have been something more then probation, IMO.

she stole a few dresses... not her fault they were overpriced 😛
 
Originally posted by: tarheelmm
Ummm, she stole over $5000 worth of merchandise. if that was anyone else it would have been something more then probation, IMO.

No they wouldn't have. Trust me.

You have to remember that this is a first offense.
 
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: tarheelmm Ummm, she stole over $5000 worth of merchandise. if that was anyone else it would have been something more then probation, IMO.
she stole a few dresses... not her fault they were overpriced 😛

/me thinks gopunk has a thing for Winona 😛
 
Originally posted by: m2kewl
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: tarheelmm Ummm, she stole over $5000 worth of merchandise. if that was anyone else it would have been something more then probation, IMO.
she stole a few dresses... not her fault they were overpriced 😛

/me thinks gopunk has a thing for Winona 😛

well the thing is, 5000 sounds like a lot, but it's not like this was at walmart, where 5000 would be like the whole store or something. this was at a store where 5000 is not that much. its the equivalent of stealing like 80 bucks worth at walmart or something. nobody would get jail time for that if it were their first offense.
 
ok,There are murderers, rapists, and gang bangers out there....who cares if she stole dresses from some prissy shop. The world has a lot bigger problems to deal with then some petty little actress. When OJ got off, that was a big deal, this is not.
 
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: m2kewl
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: tarheelmm Ummm, she stole over $5000 worth of merchandise. if that was anyone else it would have been something more then probation, IMO.
she stole a few dresses... not her fault they were overpriced 😛

/me thinks gopunk has a thing for Winona 😛

well the thing is, 5000 sounds like a lot, but it's not like this was at walmart, where 5000 would be like the whole store or something. this was at a store where 5000 is not that much. its the equivalent of stealing like 80 bucks worth at walmart or something. nobody would get jail time for that if it were their first offense.

Last I checked the law wasn't relative to the quality of the merchandise.

"I stole a car, but it was a Kia, so that's just like stealing an rc car from Radio Shack or something."

Yah, that doesn't quite work. A thief thieving high-quality merchandise is just a thief with good taste 🙂

And yah.... she's extremely hot, imo.
 
Grand Larceny is grand larceny as far as I'm concerned, celbrity or not, expensive store or not.

That being said, she got about the average sentence for a first time offense.

The prisons and justice system is overloaded and overcrowded. People really dont get the huge sentences that the media would like you to believe. I heard the national average was 1 month served for every year sentenced.
 
Last I checked the law wasn't relative to the quality of the merchandise.

"I stole a car, but it was a Kia, so that's just like stealing an rc car from Radio Shack or something."

Yah, that doesn't quite work. A thief thieving high-quality merchandise is just a thief with good taste 🙂

And yah.... she's extremely hot, imo.

right, she shouldn't get punished for her good taste is what i'm saying. its not like the rc car... because rc cars are not real cars. it would be like saying someone who stole a new kia should get the same punishment as someone who stole a new lexus.
 
And 480 hours is hardcore. Thats 3 MONTHS of full time work with no pay. Add that to the $10,000 fine and 3 years probation, and she got screwed.

I know a kid who was trafficking child porn (not my friend, an acquantance of a friend), and he was originally sentenced to 5-10. The judge later decided that was too harsh and gave him 5 years probation, no fine, and no service.
 
And let's not forget that this is just about what the prosecution was recommending. It's not like they wanted to send her to jail. It was going to be probation from the minute she was convicted.
 
OMG!!! That is so unfair. She shouldn't have got anything. SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG!!!!

For the people here who's only knowledge about this case is what they see on TV here's the real story of what happened.

In Hollywood when high profile stars "like Winona" go shopping they DON'T have to checkout at certain stores. They have people assigned to them to wait on them hand and foot. They take what they want and leave the store. The store then bills the persons account each month for the overpriced stuff they got.

Now when Winona was in the store that day the person that was suppose to wait on her hand and foot was not doing her job right. When Winona walked out of the store with the $5000 worth over overpriced crap the security guard "who was just hired a few days prior" called the police and had her arrested.

What boggles my mind is the fact that the store manager tried to explain to the police and then the DA that the whole thing was a misunderstanding and that is was the security guards fault. The DA wouldn't have any of it and was set on making a high profile example of her
 
Originally posted by: LostHiWay
OMG!!! That is so unfair. She shouldn't have got anything. SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG!!!!

For the people here who's only knowledge about this case is what they see on TV here's the real story of what happened.

In Hollywood when high profile stars "like Winona" go shopping they DON'T have to checkout at certain stores. They have people assigned to them to wait on them hand and foot. They take what they want and leave the store. The store then bills the persons account each month for the overpriced stuff they got.

Now when Winona was in the store that day the person that was suppose to wait on her hand and foot was not doing her job right. When Winona walked out of the store with the $5000 worth over overpriced crap the security guard "who was just hired a few days prior" called the police and had her arrested.

What boggles my mind is the fact that the store manager tried to explain to the police and then the DA that the whole thing was a misunderstanding and that is was the security guards fault. The DA wouldn't have any of it and was set on making a high profile example of her

*shakes sarcasm detector furiously* Might be time for new batteries.
 
Originally posted by: LostHiWay
OMG!!! That is so unfair. She shouldn't have got anything. SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG!!!! For the people here who's only knowledge about this case is what they see on TV here's the real story of what happened. In Hollywood when high profile stars "like Winona" go shopping they DON'T have to checkout at certain stores. They have people assigned to them to wait on them hand and foot. They take what they want and leave the store. The store then bills the persons account each month for the overpriced stuff they got. Now when Winona was in the store that day the person that was suppose to wait on her hand and foot was not doing her job right. When Winona walked out of the store with the $5000 worth over overpriced crap the security guard "who was just hired a few days prior" called the police and had her arrested. What boggles my mind is the fact that the store manager tried to explain to the police and then the DA that the whole thing was a misunderstanding and that is was the security guards fault. The DA wouldn't have any of it and was set on making a high profile example of her

And you know this how? If this was the real case, the media would be ALL OVER the police. I live in NYC, and believe me, every time a cop or any sort of law enforcement makes even the tiniest mistake, it is everywhere the news. The would have eaten that up far better than any trial of winona rider. And if the manager of the store says they dont want to press charges, no charges are brought. That obviously wasnt the case. Sorry, I just dont buy it.
 
Originally posted by: BD2003 And if the manager of the store says they dont want to press charges, no charges are brought. That obviously wasnt the case. Sorry, I just dont buy it.


You're forgetting...when you orginally press charges for stealing $5000 worth of stuff it makes it a felony. After this point, even if you want the charges dropped you can't because it was a felony and it's now in the courts hands to decide.

And it really wasn't the cops fault. They were just doing their job. The store made the mistake and then realized they made a mistake and tried to explain this.
 
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: LostHiWay
OMG!!! That is so unfair. She shouldn't have got anything. SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG!!!! For the people here who's only knowledge about this case is what they see on TV here's the real story of what happened. In Hollywood when high profile stars "like Winona" go shopping they DON'T have to checkout at certain stores. They have people assigned to them to wait on them hand and foot. They take what they want and leave the store. The store then bills the persons account each month for the overpriced stuff they got. Now when Winona was in the store that day the person that was suppose to wait on her hand and foot was not doing her job right. When Winona walked out of the store with the $5000 worth over overpriced crap the security guard "who was just hired a few days prior" called the police and had her arrested. What boggles my mind is the fact that the store manager tried to explain to the police and then the DA that the whole thing was a misunderstanding and that is was the security guards fault. The DA wouldn't have any of it and was set on making a high profile example of her

And you know this how? If this was the real case, the media would be ALL OVER the police. I live in NYC, and believe me, every time a cop or any sort of law enforcement makes even the tiniest mistake, it is everywhere the news. The would have eaten that up far better than any trial of winona rider. And if the manager of the store says they dont want to press charges, no charges are brought. That obviously wasnt the case. Sorry, I just dont buy it.


I agree, wheres the proof?

And this is npt the first time this has happened to her. She was just not prosocuted before this.

 
Sounds like she was sentenced quite fairly, perhaps even a little on the harsh side.

Had it been you or me the result would likely have gone much differently.

Viper GTS
 
Back
Top