- Nov 16, 1999
- 1,769
- 0
- 0
Thought I might give this a shot here at the Anandtech community. Here is my equipment...
Linksys 16 port Workgroup Switch
Linksys Cable/DSL 4 port router (latest firmware)
CAT5e ethernet
3 computers running Windows XP Professional (fully patched according to Microsofts Website)
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Adapters 3c905c-TX in all systems
Computer 1 has a lot of storage and is considered a "server"
Computer 2 and 3 are workstations
Computer 1 has a network share available that has a lot of MP3's, software, and other data. When I try to browse the share from any of the other Windows XP systems, there is a obvious delay. This delay depends on how many files and directories are inside the directory. A couple folders don't have much in them so those shares pop up like normal...my "mp3" share that has a ton of music in it, it takes a good 10-20 seconds for the folder to open. If you navigate away from the folder and go back, the delay is still there. It is quite annoying. I have gotten used to keeping a window open inside those directories that have a lot of objects in them.
All shares and usernames/passwords are set up correctly.
I have tested the speed, and it looks to be right. I am getting 100 mbits a second so I know my switch isn't malfunctioning. I didn't have these problems with Windows 2000 Professional and the same 3 computers with the same setup. I know this has to be an XP problem. I brought in a Windows 98 system from work, plugged it in, and had the same issue on my network as the other XP systems. However, the XP systems could browse to a share on the Win98 system without any slowdown.
I have tried the QOS fix that was described in these forums, as well as the Scheduler registry fix without any change. I am tempted to install Windows 2000 Server on a system and connect into one big network at home to see if that fixes it. However, before I do anything, I wanted to run this by everyone here to see if anyone else is hitting this problem.
I know there are a lot of notices on other forums about this issue, but there are no answers. Someone has got to know something!
Any questions/comments/or solutions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Linksys 16 port Workgroup Switch
Linksys Cable/DSL 4 port router (latest firmware)
CAT5e ethernet
3 computers running Windows XP Professional (fully patched according to Microsofts Website)
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Adapters 3c905c-TX in all systems
Computer 1 has a lot of storage and is considered a "server"
Computer 2 and 3 are workstations
Computer 1 has a network share available that has a lot of MP3's, software, and other data. When I try to browse the share from any of the other Windows XP systems, there is a obvious delay. This delay depends on how many files and directories are inside the directory. A couple folders don't have much in them so those shares pop up like normal...my "mp3" share that has a ton of music in it, it takes a good 10-20 seconds for the folder to open. If you navigate away from the folder and go back, the delay is still there. It is quite annoying. I have gotten used to keeping a window open inside those directories that have a lot of objects in them.
All shares and usernames/passwords are set up correctly.
I have tested the speed, and it looks to be right. I am getting 100 mbits a second so I know my switch isn't malfunctioning. I didn't have these problems with Windows 2000 Professional and the same 3 computers with the same setup. I know this has to be an XP problem. I brought in a Windows 98 system from work, plugged it in, and had the same issue on my network as the other XP systems. However, the XP systems could browse to a share on the Win98 system without any slowdown.
I have tried the QOS fix that was described in these forums, as well as the Scheduler registry fix without any change. I am tempted to install Windows 2000 Server on a system and connect into one big network at home to see if that fixes it. However, before I do anything, I wanted to run this by everyone here to see if anyone else is hitting this problem.
I know there are a lot of notices on other forums about this issue, but there are no answers. Someone has got to know something!
Thanks!