Windows Vista DRM

[greylica]

Originally posted by: masteraleph

Vista tries to stop OpenGL users.

What Vista Home have to do with it ? The fact is they are trying to implement a poorer OpenGL to promote direct-X over the years, and with Vista they tried to pull it out of the game saying the OpenGL can " potentially turn the system unsecure ". After all, we all know that was only more F.U.D. to plaggue the world.

Vista acused RETAIL users of Piracy and tries to Equal OEM = RETAIL.

At least once we found a common opinion.

Vista Tries to force us to swallow DRM without a choice.

Are you suggesting that Mac OSX.whatever that is the first to support BluRay/HD-DVD won't? No. People just won't notice it on OSX, because with the limited hardware pool, all of the macs that come with that version of OSX new will come with a graphics card that supports HDCP and a monitor that supports HDCP.

AT Least they are not intending to institute the degradation era. Simple won't play.

As for those medical workers watching bluray movies (and note, incidentally, that they don't degrade the entire display, only the movie), they should be fired for not doing their job.

Not all of them are working for hospitals, not all of them will be fired...

Vista specifications causes bottlenecks in the hardware.

What bottlenecks are these? Unless you're referring to the fact that matching the minimum specs will make the computer run fairly slowly. Look around for user experiences- after a few days, with the precaching of programs, most users reporting (those without driver problems, anyways) are reporting faster perfromance than with XP on high-end rigs.

So why a cripto-inutil chip for the Video cards ? HDMI is not suficient ?
Imagine to debugg of a criptographed message that came from hardware... Sample Here:

A problem occurred and Windows stops. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
...
...
...
STOP ERROR: @?
&%$*$&$&001 - 86&*%&*#trashID - $&%$&SUffer-**%&*$&##* - *&¨%&*$MercY(&%

We don't need those chips and these new bottlenecks. More silicon trash to consume more energy of our computers.

Vista remote atestation will force users to stay treatened to " aproved software "

I think that you meant "attestation," and MS can't check on your "approved software." The only party that can use remote attestation is a company that controls all of its computers. And if I'm an IT Professional, I sure as heck don't want anyone messing with my preconfigured settings and software. And there's currently no evidence of remote attestation being used by anyone else.

It's not intended for good use...

One day Bill Gates told the most disgusted consumer can be your best font of information.

Can someone translate this one for me? It doesn't fit any system of syntax, grammar, or spelling in the English language, or at least, one of which I am aware.

🙂 I am terrible !!!! huahauhauahau.

 

[n0cmonkey]

Originally posted by: greylica

One day Bill Gates told the most disgusted consumer can be your best font of information.

Can someone translate this one for me? It doesn't fit any system of syntax, grammar, or spelling in the English language, or at least, one of which I am aware.

🙂 I am terrible !!!! huahauhauahau.

How about:
One day Bill Gates said that "the most disgusted consumer can be your best font of information."

I'm guessing that was your question anyhow greylica, it's hard to tell with the horrible quote/reply technique going on there...

 

[Markbnj]

Originally posted by: greylica
Yeah, it´s FUD, Like Ballmer said , telling for people linux stole IP from Microsoft, well Microsoft Stole entire MAC OS and transform to Windows code, and make it suficient poorer to obligate to encrypt communications between devices to the PC worlds to loose again. If your computer stops in the future, even if you are using a super very stronger system like Linux, and you will not be able to really debug it, cause a inutility was implemented, Microsoft will be blamed by me, yes, they deserve it for the poorer Ideas they implement without user consent or discussion, forcing hardware vendors to sale expensive and inutil hardware like this S**T.
I can Tell you if Microsoft stole entire MAC OS-X, and they did cause they are not really capable of an innovation without causing problems to the consumers, I´d prefer to use the original, not the windows original, but the real MAC OS X. I really prefer real innovators like Steve Jobs or Mark Shuttleworth of UBUNTU LINUX.

VISTA IS A PIRATED COPY OF MAC, WITH HIGH QUANTITY OF POISON. SO WHY DRM THE CORE OF A PIRATED VERSION ?

IF THERE IS VISTA WITHOUT THE DRM BOTTLENECKS, CERTAINLY IT WILL BE 20 TIMES FASTER AND USES 256 MB OF RAM INSTEAD OF A GIG, LIKE THE BETTER SYSTEM CALLED BERYL.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.php

 

[greylica]

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.php

Yeah, can be, but the HDMI/HDCP engineers and all of the DRM industry is more than Myself. And want you too to trash money ...

look by yourself the facts here:

The future of inutilities like DRM and HDCP

 

[n0cmonkey]

Mark Shuttleworth is just as bad as the DRM advocates.

 

[greylica]

More here

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36574

I do not like piracy. Do not use and do not have. I do not want p2p too.
The only thing that I want is to not be forced to pay this obscure included device made for fools to spend money for inutilities like encryption between GPU and CPU.

 

[ChronoReverse]

Please stop with the stupid uninformed drivel you're trying to push.

If you have no idea and aren't using Vista why bothering repeating rumours on the internet that ARE WRONG.


There are so many other bugs and useability issues I wish MS would go and fix but the web is always filled with these so-called exposes that are simply inaccurate.