Windows Vista Doesn't Like Your Monitor?

fbrdphreak

Lifer
Apr 17, 2004
17,555
1
0
Microsoft has recently announced that the next version of Windows, due out in late 2006, will be named Vista. For all of you who?ve been following the development of Longhorn, this is it (well, it will lack a few of the planned features such as WinFS at launch). You can read the original RealTechNews coverage of the announcement here.

Getting down to business, Microsoft has decided to make Vista even tougher on DRM (Digital Rights Management) in order to prevent piracy. The new DRM ?features? of Windows Vista require that your monitor be compatible with something called Digital Content Protection. When you are trying to play a digital video file of any kind, Vista will check to see whether or not your monitor is HDCP compliant. If it is then you?re fine and everything plays just like you would expect. However, if your monitor is not compliant with HDCP Vista will make the picture fuzzy. The problem with this is that there are currently very, very few monitors that support the standard. In fact, you can be fairly certain that any monitor you have (or are about to buy) does not have this feature. So, if you thought you were going to just upgrade your OS?or even your computer?s internals?you may be sorely disappointed when you find that your digital video files refuse to play without distortion. I?m sure the monitor industry and the MPAA are loving this, but I doubt the consumer will find it quite as appealing.

http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/1603

I'm sure they won't exclude so many users, but what is this crap?
 

mcvickj

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2001
4,602
0
76
WTF? If this is true it will be just one more reason to not upgrade. I've yet to see anything that makes me go WOW.
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Solution:

Don't play DRMed video, and don't use WMP to play DVDs. And if it affects OTHER player software and non-DRM'd video, it seems to me that MS is opening themselves up to lawsuits from both content creators and software developers.
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: Injury
Source: The Inquirer

You left out that key detail that matters, because they are only a shade above the tabloids in journalistic integrity.

Actually, they TEND to be semi-correct most of the time, but exaggerate some bits. Such as the fact that it affects "all" digital video files.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: Injury
Source: The Inquirer

You left out that key detail that matters, because they are only a shade above the tabloids in journalistic integrity.

and then half of the time it turns out to be true........

Not sure what you are thinking, but 50/50 odds suck ass.

Would you rather have a 50/50 chance to live through an unesseccary surgery, or a 99.9/.01?
 

fbrdphreak

Lifer
Apr 17, 2004
17,555
1
0
Originally posted by: Injury
Would you rather have a 50/50 chance to live through an unesseccary surgery, or a 99.9/.01?
WTF does that have to do with the topic at hand??? :confused:
 

Snapster

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2001
3,916
0
0
*Yawn* what a load of bollocks. Sounds like another anti-M$ bias article and people 'still' jump on it!
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
and what are those of us with laptops supposed to do?

i just really don't see this happening. besides, all you would need is an updated driver that would claim to windows that it was compatible.
 

oogabooga

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2003
7,806
3
81
hrmm.. so what the article is saying is that you'll essentially have to upgrade your OS [which also implies your hardware to run the OS better, buy peripherals to take advantage of some of the neat features] and then buy a new monitor so you can see movies.....

I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to MS and say it'll either be only for DRM movies (which i think is still retarded) or it's shens.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
I'm really setting myself up for a case of foot-in-mouth-itis, but this is a moronic scheme that can't possibly be planned. Why in the world would MS or any other company verify your monitor to see if it should be allowed to play content? Common sense programming would mean verifying the file on the disk and that's the end of it.
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Originally posted by: yllus
I'm really setting myself up for a case of foot-in-mouth-itis, but this is a moronic scheme that can't possibly be planned. Why in the world would MS or any other company verify your monitor to see if it should be allowed to play content? Common sense programming would mean verifying the file on the disk and that's the end of it.

HDCP is already used in the home theater world.

It's used to prevent people from recording from DVI/HDMI outputs.

Viper GTS