dave_the_nerd
Lifer
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/..._updates_plus_stable_and_fastmoving_branches/
Who in the heck would use a "fast moving" Windows Server branch?
Who in the heck would use a "fast moving" Windows Server branch?
Hate to break it to you but 2016 does in fact update and restart during "inactive" hours.. Easy to disable but yeah... Based on how generally terrible the 10 updates are, it will be fun times coming into work and seeing servers "reverting changes" after a failed update. Microsoft definitely chooses ways to secure jobs but its annoying as all get out.Yeah seems like a bad idea.... especially if they decide to do like Windows 10 and force updates and reboots. You can't have servers just randomly updating and rebooting willy nilly. I could totally see MS do that too. I wonder if they will be adding all the telemetry stuff too. Wonder what that would mean for healthcare and HIPAA.
Hate to break it to you but 2016 does in fact update and restart during "inactive" hours.. Easy to disable but yeah... Based on how generally terrible the 10 updates are, it will be fun times coming into work and seeing servers "reverting changes" after a failed update. Microsoft definitely chooses ways to secure jobs but its annoying as all get out.