Originally posted by: nerp
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Who here has actually paid for any windows OS? Don't have to say on forum, but lets be honest here.
I have four legit vista licenses. Two were bought, two were free from Microsoft through promotions/programs.
Stealing an OS is soooo 1990s.
I have 5 here. Two retail copies I purchased at regular price. One through the family upgrade program MS had for a while, One I got super cheap when CompUSA closed it's doors and one as a promotional giveaway from a MS launch event.
That said, I run 2008 server and Vista Ultimate on a single machine (Dual Boot) and desktop performance between the two OS's are identical on that machine. Vista is, however, infinitely more user friendly with far less tweaking. Vista does take less time to boot though.
IMHO people running 2008 as their desktop environment aren't gaining a thing. One of the benchmarks showing 2008 to be faster than Vista is the legendary Officebench by devil mountain software which also "proved" that XP was 3x faster than Vista.
If you want to run 2008 server, more power too you, but at the end of the day, you'll be running the same kernel and get the same basic performance as you would under Vista, but only after many hours of tweaking it to become a reasonably usable desktop OS.