• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Windows Server 2003

  • Thread starter Thread starter
  • Start date Start date
I hope I'm not showing my igorance here, but I was under the impression that Hyper-Threading is "black-box" technology contained within the CPU itself and is not something an OS or App must be written to use. I am also thinking that "threading" in an OS (executing seperate functions within a process "simultaneously") is not the same as CPU threading (managing several instruction queues).

As always...if I'm wrong I'll disavow any knowledge of this post. Good luck Mr. Phelps! 😀
 
I hope I'm not showing my igorance here, but I was under the impression that Hyper-Threading is "black-box" technology contained within the CPU itself and is not something an OS or App must be written to use. I am also thinking that "threading" in an OS (executing seperate functions within a process "simultaneously") is not the same as CPU threading (managing several instruction queues).

Technically a HT CPU will show up as 2 CPUs to non-HT aware OS so it will work in a fashion, but since the OS think there's 2 physical CPUs it schedules process as if it was running on a 2 CPU machine, but that's not true and the processes usually end up fighting over resources.
 
I think my question is does Server 2003 support HT as XP SP1 does? Another words, is it (2003) optimized for HT?
 
Back
Top