Windows ReadyBooost - what's the best way to use it.

Maxspeed996

Senior member
Dec 9, 2005
848
0
0
With Vista right around the corner , and hearing about ReadyBoost and it's ability to access a thumbdrive to use as paging room instead of a slow mechanical harddisk....what would be the benefits of this over say a PCI slot being used for an I-RAM device .....then it's internal , and protected. Discuss...
 

Ayah

Platinum Member
Jan 1, 2006
2,512
1
81
I'd suggest an SSD. ;)
The I-RAM uses SATA, it just sits in a PCI slot.
 

Maxspeed996

Senior member
Dec 9, 2005
848
0
0
That's what makes me curious...doesn't the SATA interface offer 1.5 Gb/s transfer rate? That's faster than the transfer rate of a thumdrive isn't it? I'm just thinking about the limitations of USB 2.0 which granted 400+ Mb/s isn't anything to scoff at but at over 4x the transfer speeds wouldn't you think the I-Ram or RAM DISK would offer better performance?
 

Ayah

Platinum Member
Jan 1, 2006
2,512
1
81
SATA's at 150MB/s. Thumbdrives are usually stuck at 50MB/s at their very best.
 

Ayah

Platinum Member
Jan 1, 2006
2,512
1
81
I'd say a RAM based solution would be the fastest out of the two. Probably easily getting 100MB/s and potentially more depending on the interface.
(We can dream of a PCI-E x8 I-RAM)
 

Maxspeed996

Senior member
Dec 9, 2005
848
0
0
Granted ,this will be the upgrade that "Joe Consumer" could just plug right in without having to crack open the case on his/her machine to upgrade. So that makes it a winner I'm sure in Micro$oft's eyes.
This just brings a piece of hardware to mind that I've not seen discussed much at all. I'd like to hear more people's thoughts on the I-RAM / RAMDrive idea and in comparison to the flashdrive option since the flashdrive seems to be the way that developers for Micro$oft are leaning. I'm curious why this is , given the potential of the former.
 

Maxspeed996

Senior member
Dec 9, 2005
848
0
0
Now I'm reading more and more on this....

http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2480

I guess didn't really show any substantial benifit of the I-RAM over adding more memory to your machine. I do have older DDR memory just laying around , but at the expense of probably $150-$200 for the add in card itself, doesn't make much sense.

So I come back to the main question. For those that are using 2+ gigs of memory , I've already changed my settings for windows to not use the hard drive for the pagefile , and I don't ever come close to using all of the memory. do you think this is going to just be the cheap easy way for "JoeBlow" to upgrade his/her performance a tick?

And the real question for Gamers would be , what will it equate to in terms of FPS?
 

stogez

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2006
2,684
0
0
They're leaning towards a USB drive because thats a cheaper and easier to use alternative that still provides some improvement in performance. I'm sure hardcore pc users/gamers would likely use i-ram as their paging file.
 

Noubourne

Senior member
Dec 15, 2003
751
0
76
It won't be useful at all for normal users. Adding more internal RAM is by far the best solution. This is a stopgap solution for computers that can't have more RAM added, or can only have more added at great expense, with slow hard drives that also are an arm and a leg to upgrade.

In other words, it would only be something to consider for a laptop. There are far better ways to upgrade a desktop. This is a solution for when none of those better ways are available.

It certainly isn't for gamers, and iRAM was proven to suck hardcore as well.
 

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
I-RAM v.2 is coming out soon. It mounts in the optical drive bay and uses DDR2 RAM.
 

Noubourne

Senior member
Dec 15, 2003
751
0
76
I'd like to see one benchmark showing either of them was even worth the $50 you'd spend on a flashdrive.
 

airhendrix13

Senior member
Oct 15, 2006
427
0
0
This looks a lot like a rocket drive. A rocket drive basically uses that same style of card and you can connect 4 ram modules to it and the card emulates those sticks as a hard drive. People who load windows onto the rocket drive can boot into windows in under 3 seconds......but those will run you about $1500 so i doubt that this is as good as a rocket drive....
 

Maxspeed996

Senior member
Dec 9, 2005
848
0
0
I'm sure that's where the technology started , was with the Rocket Drive...but that thing is 5 years old. Prices for 1 gig sticks of DDR memory was not cheap.
The device that I was talking about , the I-drive is similar , but contains its own battery and doesn't need external power. And you can populate it with DDR memory of your choosing.
It sounds like a great idea , but there wasn't much in the AnAndTech review that suggested that it was a wave of the future or anything. But for around $150 it might be a cool toy to play with.