• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Windows 2003 and NICs?

sirfergy

Golden Member
Does anyone know where to get NIC drivers for Windows 2003? By default it comes with none, and I have a Linksys LNE100TX Version 2.0 NIC which it doesn't detect.

Thanks!
 
Yeah it picked up the VMWare driver for me just fine too. 🙂 It's when I put it in a real computer it cannot find any NICs.
 
By default it comes with none, and I have a Linksys LNE100TX Version 2.0 NIC which it doesn't detect.

Not true. It found both my Realtek and Intel cards just fine. Try the XP drivers (not 2K) for any your missing.
Bill
 
Originally posted by: sirfergy
Does anyone know where to get NIC drivers for Windows 2003? By default it comes with none, and I have a Linksys LNE100TX Version 2.0 NIC which it doesn't detect.

Thanks!

get a real nic.

3Com


🙂
 
How do I get the XP drivers?
From linksys.com of course.

You'll need to identify which chip your card has on it to figure out which driver to download. Linksys used a number of different chipsets for that model. The download page has pictures of the different cards.
 
Originally posted by: bozo1
Guess Microsoft assumed people would be using a real NIC with a server OS.

Can I suggest the 'get a real nic' comments are particullarly helpfull to sirfergy....
Bill
 
Thanks!

Also, I happen to have a Negear FA310TX that has the same problem. Oddly enough, Netgear doesn't even post drivers on their website anymore for that card. I had to use the original floppy it came with.
 
My comment wasn't meant to be snide. I was simply pointing out that maybe Microsoft didn't go to the trouble to include support for lower tier cards. The market for W2K and 2003 Server usually uses higher-end stuff.
 
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Guess Microsoft assumed people would be using a real NIC with a server OS.

And yet the still force you to use a video card with their 'server' OS, strange.
Perhaps beacuse of windows media server tight integration to the server which is a big part for broadcasting multimedia server technology with windows-media asf, wma/wmv etc.
 
Perhaps beacuse of windows media server tight integration to the server which is a big part for broadcasting multimedia server technology with windows-media asf, wma/wmv etc.

If their media broadcasting is tied to the UI, they've got some majorly broken interdependencies.
 
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Perhaps beacuse of windows media server tight integration to the server which is a big part for broadcasting multimedia server technology with windows-media asf, wma/wmv etc.

If their media broadcasting is tied to the UI, they've got some majorly broken interdependencies.
Don't know what you mean? but windows media has been considered in the development for sure
, just see this link It goes down to the protocol level as well as multhi-threading.
this is the biggest diffrence from 'nix servers i guess in that respect.
 
And yet the still force you to use a video card with their 'server' OS, strange.

NH, I like you, I really do, but your constant MS bashing gets really annoying. Especially when it's baseless. 😉

Bill
 
Originally posted by: sirfergy
Well, back to my original problem.... 🙂

Well, XP drivers where your only real choice. If the vendor hasn't provided them, they are unlikely to provde W3k ones (their basically the same driver, if not identical, unlike 2k to XP). Afraid you might be stuck with that card...

Sorry,
Bill
 
Originally posted by: sirfergy
Well, back to my original problem.... 🙂
I don't think there is a solution. Until/Unless Linksys releases a driver, your card is unsupported.


 
Don't know what you mean? but windows media has been considered in the development for sure
, just see this link It goes down to the protocol level as well as multhi-threading.
this is the biggest diffrence from 'nix servers i guess in that respect.

I actually don't know what your trying to say here 😉, but the headless issue has nothing to do with media streaming.
Bill

 
Originally posted by: bsobel
Don't know what you mean? but windows media has been considered in the development for sure
, just see this link It goes down to the protocol level as well as multhi-threading.
this is the biggest diffrence from 'nix servers i guess in that respect.

I actually don't know what your trying to say here 😉, but the headless issue has nothing to do with media streaming.
Bill
Bill, could you setup windows media server and broadcast with windows media encoder from the 'headless server' ?
 
Back
Top