Originally posted by: WolverineGator
Originally posted by: Rastus
How much bulk beef is in the cargo hold?
Probably 10 pounds.
Originally posted by: ScottMac
OP: DIAF for bringing this up again.
The mechanics and physics haven't changed, water or treadmill. Same / Same.
The plane take off.
Originally posted by: Acanthus
It will take off if you throw .999 repeating hand grenades at it.
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: ScottMac
OP: DIAF for bringing this up again.
The mechanics and physics haven't changed, water or treadmill. Same / Same.
The plane take off.
You're wrong.
In the water case, you're dragging the pontoons against the water. The faster the current, the more skin friction against the pontoons, requiring more force to take off.
In the treadmill case, the friction force on the airplane from the wheels is NOT dependent on the speed of the wheels.
In this case, though, the question is "how fast is the current" because whether or not it will take off depends on this. In the treadmill case, the speed is not relevant.
<--- Professional aerodynamicist for major airplane manufacturer
Originally posted by: Number1
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: ScottMac
OP: DIAF for bringing this up again.
The mechanics and physics haven't changed, water or treadmill. Same / Same.
The plane take off.
You're wrong.
In the water case, you're dragging the pontoons against the water. The faster the current, the more skin friction against the pontoons, requiring more force to take off.
In the treadmill case, the friction force on the airplane from the wheels is NOT dependent on the speed of the wheels.
In this case, though, the question is "how fast is the current" because whether or not it will take off depends on this. In the treadmill case, the speed is not relevant.
<--- Professional aerodynamicist for major airplane manufacturer
Time to find another job!!!!!
Muthbuster is going to do the plane on a threadmill story in December I believe.
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: Number1
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: ScottMac
OP: DIAF for bringing this up again.
The mechanics and physics haven't changed, water or treadmill. Same / Same.
The plane take off.
You're wrong.
In the water case, you're dragging the pontoons against the water. The faster the current, the more skin friction against the pontoons, requiring more force to take off.
In the treadmill case, the friction force on the airplane from the wheels is NOT dependent on the speed of the wheels.
In this case, though, the question is "how fast is the current" because whether or not it will take off depends on this. In the treadmill case, the speed is not relevant.
<--- Professional aerodynamicist for major airplane manufacturer
Time to find another job!!!!!
Muthbuster is going to do the plane on a threadmill story in December I believe.
Sorry, Mythbusters are stupid.
No, he's right. The pontoons are directly connected to the airplane, and any force that affects them will affect the entire aircraft.Originally posted by: Number1
Time to find another job!!!!!
Muthbuster is going to do the plane on a threadmill story in December I believe.
Originally posted by: Number1
I find the show quite entertaining.
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
No, he's right. The pontoons are directly connected to the airplane, and any force that affects them will affect the entire aircraft.Originally posted by: Number1
Time to find another job!!!!!
Muthbuster is going to do the plane on a threadmill story in December I believe.
<--- Cartographer
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: SoulAssassin
If Mythbusters do this I hope they blow the plane up at the end for no scientific reason.
They also need an excuse to have Kari Byron in a skimpy swimsuit. Maybe they should sink it and make her recover the blackbox or something.
Originally posted by: Ctrackstar126
I feel bad for the random people who come and read the forums. For people who dont know the history these threads would just be a big WTF. Actually I know the history and its still a WTF
Originally posted by: tfinch2
The plane will take off and crash into the OP.
Originally posted by: irishScott
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: SoulAssassin
If Mythbusters do this I hope they blow the plane up at the end for no scientific reason.
They also need an excuse to have Kari Byron in a skimpy swimsuit. Maybe they should sink it and make her recover the blackbox or something.
Already done.
http://www.loveredheads.com/wp...6/08/kari_byron_02.jpg (SFW)
http://saturn5.com/darwin/beef...adio_belly_800x600.jpg (SFW)
http://saturn5.com/darwin/beef...adio_smile_800x600.jpg (SFW)
Coefficient of friction was never defined in the original problem, nor was the geometry of the pontoons. For all we know the water could be in a super-fluid state.Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: ScottMac
OP: DIAF for bringing this up again.
The mechanics and physics haven't changed, water or treadmill. Same / Same.
The plane take off.
You're wrong.
In the water case, you're dragging the pontoons against the water. The faster the current, the more skin friction against the pontoons, requiring more force to take off.
In the treadmill case, the friction force on the airplane from the wheels is NOT dependent on the speed of the wheels.
In this case, though, the question is "how fast is the current" because whether or not it will take off depends on this. In the treadmill case, the speed is not relevant.
<--- Professional aerodynamicist for major airplane manufacturer
Originally posted by: TecHNooB
The plane never takes off. In either case. Who seriously thinks the plane will take off?
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
No, he's right. The pontoons are directly connected to the airplane, and any force that affects them will affect the entire aircraft.Originally posted by: Number1
Time to find another job!!!!!
Muthbuster is going to do the plane on a threadmill story in December I believe.
<--- Cartographer
