- Jan 9, 2001
- 7,572
- 2
- 76
My gf and I recently really got into The Sopranos (Yeah, we're about a decade late). Got us into a mob kick, and neither of us had ever seen the Godfather, so we decided to give it a shot.
This movie is on everyone's top 10 list. Number 1 in many cases. And for the life of us, we cannot figure out why.
It's not bad. We just didn't think it was great. What are we missing? There didn't seem to be much cleverness to the plot-introduce about 200 characters, and then kill them. The guy won't cut a deal on the hotel? Ok, we shoot him. The sister's husband beats her up, then sets up Sonny to be killed? Ok, we kill him. The crooked cop? Shoot him in a restaurant and flee to Italy. There he meets a new wife, who gets blown up in car. Not that she ever said enough for us to really care who she was, and her entire character was pretty much irrelevant to the rest of the story. Character development? Other than Michael predictably turning from nice guy to mob boss, there didn't seem to be any depth to these guys at all. Maybe it's because of it being one of the "first" mob movies, but to us, it seemed to be more of a mockery of mob movies than one we'd actually want to sent through the 3+ hours of again and again, as so many people do.
It's not just a "dated" quality-many of my favorites pre-date Godfather by a good margin (Malteese Falcon, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, To Kill a Mockingbird, etc). It just...wasn't that interesting. We're going back to the Sopranos, where the characters are interesting and complex, the plot is driven by brow-raising curveballs, and the deaths are actually something you care about from time to time. (We've only finished the first 2 seasons so far, so don't spoil anything beyond that for us).
I know everyone goes on about the acting, the lighting and scenery, etc. But seriously, who cares when the story is this bland? I actually read the heavy-duty synopsis on IMDB to make sure I wasn't missing anything-nope. Seems pretty straight-forward.
So, let us have it, ATOT: What are we missing that everyone else seems to get so wet over with this film?
This movie is on everyone's top 10 list. Number 1 in many cases. And for the life of us, we cannot figure out why.
It's not bad. We just didn't think it was great. What are we missing? There didn't seem to be much cleverness to the plot-introduce about 200 characters, and then kill them. The guy won't cut a deal on the hotel? Ok, we shoot him. The sister's husband beats her up, then sets up Sonny to be killed? Ok, we kill him. The crooked cop? Shoot him in a restaurant and flee to Italy. There he meets a new wife, who gets blown up in car. Not that she ever said enough for us to really care who she was, and her entire character was pretty much irrelevant to the rest of the story. Character development? Other than Michael predictably turning from nice guy to mob boss, there didn't seem to be any depth to these guys at all. Maybe it's because of it being one of the "first" mob movies, but to us, it seemed to be more of a mockery of mob movies than one we'd actually want to sent through the 3+ hours of again and again, as so many people do.
It's not just a "dated" quality-many of my favorites pre-date Godfather by a good margin (Malteese Falcon, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, To Kill a Mockingbird, etc). It just...wasn't that interesting. We're going back to the Sopranos, where the characters are interesting and complex, the plot is driven by brow-raising curveballs, and the deaths are actually something you care about from time to time. (We've only finished the first 2 seasons so far, so don't spoil anything beyond that for us).
I know everyone goes on about the acting, the lighting and scenery, etc. But seriously, who cares when the story is this bland? I actually read the heavy-duty synopsis on IMDB to make sure I wasn't missing anything-nope. Seems pretty straight-forward.
So, let us have it, ATOT: What are we missing that everyone else seems to get so wet over with this film?
