at HardOCP, they blame the fact of not being able to OC past 143MHz fsb on the chipset itself, or the BIOS and/or driver set. sure they proved beyond a doubt that the CPU wasn't holding them back. we can safely say that the AGP and PCI buses don't pose a problem b/c they have been locked at a 2:1 default ratio of 66MHz:33MHz, or one not far fropm default that still allows the system to post with no problems. what about the memory? there's no doubt that theCorsair XMS3200 is high qualoty RAM, but if the incorrect fsb:RAM ratio is used, then even the best of memory will keep a system from posting. they didn't mention the memory in the OCing conclusion section at the end of the article. besides, the chipset itself has already proven to be a good OCer on other SiS 648 boards that have come out. 143MHz fsb certainly isn't a limitation on other obards. so i'm not so sure its the chipset itself. BIOS?...i dont know about that. sure the BIOS can be revised to increase performance by allowing such things as higher Vcore and FSB settings. but that doesn't necessarily increase stability and reliability. so i'm not sure how a BIOS revision will make this board OC past 143MHz fsb. i mean you already have the option of raising the FSB to 200MHz in 1MHz increments. maybe ABit is responsible for the chipsets less-than-par performance, not SiS, for reasons such as poor implementation and low quality PCB. who knows at this point. but i cant purchase this baord with hope that a simple BIOS revision will fix it all. i'd have to see it happen first. well i'm about to read the AnandTech review now, so i'll be back in a bit...