Will hillary make it to the first debate

[SMOGZINN]

I seriously;y doubt it.

In a face to face debate shillary will get steamrolled.

That is almost cute in it's naivety. Although, from reading your threads for years I can see why you would think so.

 

[theeedude]

Hillary Clinton 'healthy and fit', says doctor

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37369615

I've had walking pneumonia in the past myself, it can knock you out.

100/70 BP is better than mine and I am half her age

 

[HomerJS]

100/70 BP is better than mine and I am half her age

Trump is obese, eats fast food regularly doesn't exercise and has high cholesterol. How good could his real medical report be?

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Trump is obese, eats fast food regularly doesn't exercise and has high cholesterol. How good could his real medical report be?

as good as he wants to write it.

 

[Jhhnn]

as good as he wants to write it.

The best part is that his voters believed him about releasing the records on Dr Oz. They didn't watch Dr Oz so now they believe that he did.

 

[MongGrel]

In a face to face debate shillary will get steamrolled.

I can't wait for the debates myself.

 

[C1]

Hey, there's 33 pages of "Hillary faints @ ground zero?" thread that shows that her situation is transparent as all get.

If you believe anything then all Trump needs to do is insist Hillary debate live and have a plant in the audience to point a 5 hz hand held pencil beam strobe (and induce epileptic seizure).

http://www.silverdoctors.com/headli...from-parkinsons-seizures-from-camera-flashes/

 

[C1]

Hey, there's 33 pages of "Hillary faints @ ground zero?" thread that shows that her situation is transparent as all get.

If you believe anything then all Trump needs to do is insist Hillary debate live and have a plant in the audience to point a 5 hz hand held pencil beam strobe (and induce epileptic seizure).

http://www.silverdoctors.com/headli...from-parkinsons-seizures-from-camera-flashes/

 

[Jhhnn]

I can't wait for the debates myself.

She'll be there, like a lioness waiting in the tall grass by the water hole.

 

[Carson Dyle]

Boy, she's sure fading fast in the polls. Been a rough couple of weeks for her.

 

[nickqt]

Boy, she's sure fading fast in the polls. Been a rough couple of weeks for her.

Her dropping in the polls is directly proportional to how much the media is biased towards her.

All Strongman Trump has to do is not retweet from white supremacists and he's considered to be pivoting towards being Presidential.

 

[Carson Dyle]

Her dropping in the polls is directly proportional to how much the media is biased towards her.

Yeah... I don't follow that logic. But then again, I don't follow how either of these piles of manure were nominated by American voters to run for the highest office in the country.

 

[Jhhnn]

Yeah... I don't follow that logic. But then again, I don't follow how either of these piles of manure were nominated by American voters to run for the highest office in the country.

False equivalency, huh?

When Trump lies, it's expected behavior & apparently perfectly acceptable. Over and over again, like water off a duck.

When Clinton's staff doesn't handle the fainting episode very well, it means that she's dying & lying about some horrible disease. And acting like typhoid Mary, too.

 

[Roflmouth]

False equivalency, huh?

No such thing. Both the nominees are utter turds, it'll just be a matter of which of them voters hate less. Try not to cry

 

[flexy]

Yeah... I don't follow that logic. But then again, I don't follow how either of these piles of manure were nominated by American voters to run for the highest office in the country.

Ironically, there are easy answers.

Hillary was "nominated" since the entire s*it system is set-up like this, already forget the DNC scandal and ugly Wassermann-Schulz and how they screwed over Bernie (sort-of)....this is how SHE got "nominated".

And Trump was "nominated" since the Right is (and always has been) busy with crafting fantasy stories and throwing shit at the opposing side, rather than improving/modernizing their party and producing an actual serious nominee.

 

[Starbuck1975]

False equivalency, huh?

When Trump lies, it's expected behavior & apparently perfectly acceptable. Over and over again, like water off a duck.

When Clinton's staff doesn't handle the fainting episode very well, it means that she's dying & lying about some horrible disease. And acting like typhoid Mary, too.

He is an entertainer and knows how to play the media. She is a dull politician who has been in the public eye for too long. The only spectacle around Clinton is how she manages to repeatedly shoot herself in the foot despite her considerable advantages.

 

[theeedude]

I hope they both make it, and we get to hear an honest exchange of ideas. I am sure Trump has great policies that will totally work and trickle down any time now.

 

[Jhhnn]

Ironically, there are easy answers.

Hillary was "nominated" since the entire s*it system is set-up like this, already forget the DNC scandal and ugly Wassermann-Schulz and how they screwed over Bernie (sort-of)....this is how SHE got "nominated".

And Trump was "nominated" since the Right is (and always has been) busy with crafting fantasy stories and throwing shit at the opposing side, rather than improving/modernizing their party and producing an actual serious nominee.

Please. Hillary crushed Bernie in the primaries because she was favored overwhelmingly by Democrats.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/

Repubs can't improve their party until they abandon trickle down economics, an impossibility. They represent the financial elite entirely with all of their other issues merely shiny objects used to woo the gullible.

 

[CitizenKain]

Ironically, there are easy answers.

Hillary was "nominated" since the entire s*it system is set-up like this, already forget the DNC scandal and ugly Wassermann-Schulz and how they screwed over Bernie (sort-of)....this is how SHE got "nominated".

And Trump was "nominated" since the Right is (and always has been) busy with crafting fantasy stories and throwing shit at the opposing side, rather than improving/modernizing their party and producing an actual serious nominee.

No, Hillary was nominated because more people voted for her. Not difficult to comprehend here.

 

[flexy]

Ah...big surprise "more people voted for her", because, NORMALLY, more people are voting for he/she who has the most money and support behind them. And the entire DNC put their power behind Clinton (although they were supposed to be impartial, not the fucking "Clinton Campaign HQ") - so YES, "more (delegates) voted for Clinton", big surprise there!

 

[ivwshane]

Ah...big surprise "more people voted for her", because, NORMALLY, more people are voting for he/she who has the most money and support behind them. And the entire DNC put their power behind Clinton (although they were supposed to be impartial, not the fucking "Clinton Campaign HQ") - so YES, "more (delegates) voted for Clinton", big surprise there!

You might want to tell that to Jeb Bush.


Lol reality is a bitch.

 

[Jhhnn]

Ah...big surprise "more people voted for her", because, NORMALLY, more people are voting for he/she who has the most money and support behind them. And the entire DNC put their power behind Clinton (although they were supposed to be impartial, not the fucking "Clinton Campaign HQ") - so YES, "more (delegates) voted for Clinton", big surprise there!

You might want to tell that to Jeb Bush.


Lol reality is a bitch.

Caucuses make it hard to establish firm numbers, but Clinton received approx 16.8M votes (55%) to Sanders' 13.2M votes (43%).

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/was-the-democratic-primary-a-close-call-or-a-landslide/

Bernie got his shot but Dems picked Hillary. Bitter Bernie voters need to get over themselves so we can beat Trump.

 

[MrSquished]

Ah...big surprise "more people voted for her", because, NORMALLY, more people are voting for he/she who has the most money and support behind them. And the entire DNC put their power behind Clinton (although they were supposed to be impartial, not the fucking "Clinton Campaign HQ") - so YES, "more (delegates) voted for Clinton", big surprise there!

meh. as a Sanders supporter throughout the primaries the DNC scandal was severely overblown. All those emails and all they showed was a couple of suggestions made to attack Sanders, one of which was to invoke his Jewish religion. Neither of the suggestions were followed through on and the primaries moved on. What hurt Sanders more was a lack of media coverage during the early stages of the primaries. Clinton just beat him at the end of the day. Remember in 2008 Obama came out of a virtual nowhere to beat the Clinton machine. So it can happen.

That being said I think the overall process in this system is screwed up. It's screwed up for third parties all around and heavily biased for establishment politicians during the primary process.

 

[Victorian Gray]

Ah...big surprise "more people voted for her", because, NORMALLY, more people are voting for he/she who has the most money and support behind them. And the entire DNC put their power behind Clinton (although they were supposed to be impartial, not the fucking "Clinton Campaign HQ") - so YES, "more (delegates) voted for Clinton", big surprise there!

Popular vote during the primaries had Clinton win roughly 3 million more votes than Sanders. That is *not* delegates, that is the popular vote. Sanders was simply not as popular as Clinton.

 

[Jhhnn]

meh. as a Sanders supporter throughout the primaries the DNC scandal was severely overblown. All those emails and all they showed was a couple of suggestions made to attack Sanders, one of which was to invoke his Jewish religion. Neither of the suggestions were followed through on and the primaries moved on. What hurt Sanders more was a lack of media coverage during the early stages of the primaries. Clinton just beat him at the end of the day. Remember in 2008 Obama came out of a virtual nowhere to beat the Clinton machine. So it can happen.

That being said I think the overall process in this system is screwed up. It's screwed up for third parties all around and heavily biased for establishment politicians during the primary process.

Well, if the system is screwed up it's been that way for a very long time & we seem to be able to function with it decently well.

Honest Bernie supporters will close ranks behind Clinton because they're Democrats & decent people who recognize that Trump is a national disgrace & the Repub party not much better.

Clinton voters would have done the same for Bernie had he prevailed.