Wikileaks releases 19K+ DNC emails, searchable

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Why is any of this surprising to any of you? Do you think a Republican email dump would be any different? Hahaha. I bet it would be even more vile and corrupt.

This is the way humans operate.... In every single field imaginable. Friends help friends.. especially against common enemies.

I'm more sad for Bernie than mad at the establishment. I doubt there will be anything of terrible significance come from this. Like I said, all the same type of stuff that you would find in .. pretty much anything where public relations matters. As if Trump isn't asking favors of all his friends? I thought it was understood this is how things worked.
 

Artdeco

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2015
2,682
1
0
p3IyfJ.jpg


Move along, nothing to see here...
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
People like sausage, they just typically don't like how its made.

Good analogy.. D:

:D

If I knew a Fox news reporters name, I would mock up an email that had them saying "We're going to stay republican focused" lol.

In other news, politicians are corrupt. Story at 11.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,936
55,293
136
[fskipmospy]
Yeah, but all of the polls are just statistical sampling and according to 538 are perfectly fine[/fskimospy]

This shit should end the debate that these polls are just manipulated jokes created by the 1% to direct thought.

Lol, did you even bother to read your own story? You are so, so stupid.

First, that site is hilariously biased. It's amusing how it attempts to impugn other polls while holding Rasmussen forth as 'scientific' when those polls have been historically much more accurate than Rasmussen. I am not at all surprised that you got taken in by it though. You are so easily duped.

Second, and more importantly, those emails discuss the bullet points discussing the results themselves, not how to word the poll that was read to voters. Lol.

Talking to media organizations to secure favorable coverage is something that literally every competent political party does every single day.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Here comes fuckimospy defending the hack lmsm. As long as they are hacking for the DNC its all good.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Lol, did you even bother to read your own story? You are so, so stupid.

First, that site is hilariously biased. It's amusing how it attempts to impugn other polls while holding Rasmussen forth as 'scientific' when those polls have been historically much more accurate than Rasmussen. I am not at all surprised that you got taken in by it though. You are so easily duped.

Second, and more importantly, those emails discuss the bullet points discussing the results themselves, not how to word the poll that was read to voters. Lol.

Talking to media organizations to secure favorable coverage is something that literally every competent political party does every single day.
Meh, I didn't even read it too much. More busy with my house.
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
DNC leaking Bernie emails to WSJ :

WikiLeaks_-_Search_the_DNC_email_database.jpg



Politico journalist sending stories to DNC before sending to editor :

screen%20shot%202016-07-22%20at%202.25.51%20pm.png


DNC talking about sending interns and operatives to anti-GOP demonstrations :

v0rnpy.jpg



DNC "offering" CNN questions to ask them, planting questions :

Cn_0tfFWAAEhjy6.jpg
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
this is pretty damning for the DNC and media outlets, but I don't really understand how people are reaching the "fuck Hillary" conclusion especially when it's been made clear that she's going to replace DWS.
 

Artdeco

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2015
2,682
1
0
this is pretty damning for the DNC and media outlets, but I don't really understand how people are reaching the "fuck Hillary" conclusion especially when it's been made clear that she's going to replace DWS.

I think in general, people are perceiving the campaign working hand in glove with the DNC.

I'm not big on conspiracies, but I'm hearing there's much more to come.
 
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,512
17,016
136
I think in general, people are perceiving the campaign working hand in glove with the DNC.

I'm not big on conspiracies, but I'm hearing there's much more to come.

You are full of shit, you are all about conspiracies!
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,312
32,821
136
I don't have a dog in the Chuck Todd show but I have questions.

Anyone ever watch a game when the coach of a team bitches to the referee about how he's making calls against their team and demands fairness/changes. Does anyone automatically conclude there is collusion between coach and ref?

Are there any posts where Chuck contacts DWS agreeing to change his coverage??

Just as an observation if DWS is bitching to Chuck about his coverage its more likely said coverage is not biased
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
this is pretty damning for the DNC and media outlets, but I don't really understand how people are reaching the "fuck Hillary" conclusion especially when it's been made clear that she's going to replace DWS.


This might help enlighten :

How Can You Join the DNC Class Action Lawsuit?


What she did is fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud.

When you donate, you donate under a system of rules.

Here's one of many relevant rules for those donating to DNC campaigns :

In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Seems like a reasonable thing for politicos to do. It's up to the reporters to sieve through the nonsense.

Shady seems to think it's unique to the DNC & that it's not really useful to the process. If Repubs only had to answer the questions they want to answer you'd think they could walk on water.