• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

WikiLeaks now straight up telling Americans to vote for Trump

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
pcgeek11 said:
Everything I stated is true.
Click to expand...

Then what you need to do is get someone to run for office that believes the same thing, back them and get them elected. Hell, since you know what is true why don't you get out there, proclaim the truth, build a massive following while running for President on that truth, win in a record-breaking landslide, then rake in the universal worship and acclaim that you so richly deserve?

Seems to be working for Trump, amirite? 😉
 
DrDoug said:
Then what you need to do is get someone to run for office that believes the same thing, back them and get them elected. Hell, since you know what is true why don't you get out there, proclaim the truth, build a massive following while running for President on that truth, win in a record-breaking landslide, then rake in the universal worship and acclaim that you so richly deserve?

Seems to be working for Trump, amirite? 😉
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you are raving about. Off your medication?
 
HamburgerBoy said:
I agree that they're timing the leaks to maximize damage to the Clinton campaign. It is very clear that Assange does not like Clinton. However, from the context of my conversation with Balt, I was referring to Republican/Trump-related dirt that Wikileaks is refusing to release.

This assumption would seem to suggest that Russia attempted to or successfully hacked the RNC as well, which would fly in the face of the current mantra that Russia started all of this for the primary purpose of making Clinton look bad and Trump look good.

You're also assuming that Trump's empire has the same visibility and reach that the DNC does, which I think is a pretty terrible assumption considering that Trump keeps a very tight lid on his operations and image, and does not have the same obligation to keep potentially-damning documentation on hand that a public official might.
Click to expand...
His assumption also assumes that Trump had any strategy to leak. They could possibly get hacked info from the RNC, but it would be trying to keep Trump out, not in. And anyway, most of the Republican establishment are saying those things in public. Besides, the US media is already functioning as the Democrats' October surprise.

Wonder what odds one could get on which year of the Clinton II reign Julian eats a Hellfire.
 
Lots of tribal democrats in this thread. I don't think Wikileaks are pro-Trump. They're likely more pro-Sanders. They just hate the establishment. If it had been Sanders vs Bush, they'd likely focused on Bush.

This entire thread is a hilarious bucket of Clintonite tears. Your candidate sucks, just deal with it. (And BTW Trump is a disaster). It can't be fun having to choose between two god-awful candidates but that is America 2016.
 
Mondozei said:
Lots of tribal democrats in this thread. I don't think Wikileaks are pro-Trump. They're likely more pro-Sanders. They just hate the establishment. If it had been Sanders vs Bush, they'd likely focused on Bush.

This entire thread is a hilarious bucket of Clintonite tears. Your candidate sucks, just deal with it. (And BTW Trump is a disaster). It can't be fun having to choose between two god-awful candidates but that is America 2016.
Click to expand...
That's the tragedy of a two-party system: It matters not how much your candidate sucks if the other party's candidate sucks more.
 
Don't stand next to Julian once HRC gets Seal Team Six to work for her. (joke) {Please don't start a movement based on that.}
"I read it on the Internet!"
 
It seems implied that Clinton is better for America than Trump. How so? Wealth inequality under democrat policies is already at critical levels. Democrats in practice are figuratively throwing gifts at the poor to placate them while the rich siphon off an every growing slice of wealth at nearly no risk. The fate of the country is actually hanging in the balance IMO.

And I have no illusions about the economy likely collapsing under trump, but the bubbles/misallocation of wealth needs to stop or else the whole thing goes down.

There are two outcomes... stop stimulating the economy and let what happens just happen and get it over with, or keep cutting rates and end up with some kind of bizarre Japanese economy where the birth rate is low because no one can afford a family.

I feel like if Japan goes under/hits full monetezation it would serve as a clear warning to the world what happens when you ignore your debt problems for too long
 
OverVolt said:
It seems implied that Clinton is better for America than Trump. How so? Wealth inequality under democrat policies is already at critical levels. Democrats in practice are figuratively throwing gifts at the poor to placate them while the rich siphon off an every growing slice of wealth at nearly no risk. The fate of the country is actually hanging in the balance IMO.

And I have no illusions about the economy likely collapsing under trump, but the bubbles/misallocation of wealth needs to stop or else the whole thing goes down.

There are two outcomes... stop stimulating the economy and let what happens just happen and get it over with, or keep cutting rates and end up with some kind of bizarre Japanese economy where the birth rate is low because no one can afford a family.

I feel like if Japan goes under/hits full monetezation it would serve as a clear warning to the world what happens when you ignore your debt problems for too long
Click to expand...


I suggest you get some updated stats because you are starting to sound like a moron!
 
ivwshane said:
I suggest you get some updated stats because you are starting to sound like a moron!
Click to expand...
What wealth inequality? The only thing to argue is how steep the upward slope goes.

Wealth inequity usually precedes a great depression or war type event. Its very Machiavellian. Wealth inequality will necessitate more and more handouts.

"A prince who buys his peoples favor with his wealth will ultimately end up with neither his wealth nor his peoples favor"

Womp womp. Just the way the world works.
 
OverVolt said:
It seems implied that Clinton is better for America than Trump. How so? Wealth inequality under democrat policies is already at critical levels. Democrats in practice are figuratively throwing gifts at the poor to placate them while the rich siphon off an every growing slice of wealth at nearly no risk. The fate of the country is actually hanging in the balance IMO.

And I have no illusions about the economy likely collapsing under trump, but the bubbles/misallocation of wealth needs to stop or else the whole thing goes down.

There are two outcomes... stop stimulating the economy and let what happens just happen and get it over with, or keep cutting rates and end up with some kind of bizarre Japanese economy where the birth rate is low because no one can afford a family.

I feel like if Japan goes under/hits full monetezation it would serve as a clear warning to the world what happens when you ignore your debt problems for too long
Click to expand...

Why do you hate capitalism? Are you some kind of commie?
 
OverVolt said:
It seems implied that Clinton is better for America than Trump. How so? Wealth inequality under democrat policies is already at critical levels. Democrats in practice are figuratively throwing gifts at the poor to placate them while the rich siphon off an every growing slice of wealth at nearly no risk. The fate of the country is actually hanging in the balance IMO.

And I have no illusions about the economy likely collapsing under trump, but the bubbles/misallocation of wealth needs to stop or else the whole thing goes down.

There are two outcomes... stop stimulating the economy and let what happens just happen and get it over with, or keep cutting rates and end up with some kind of bizarre Japanese economy where the birth rate is low because no one can afford a family.

I feel like if Japan goes under/hits full monetezation it would serve as a clear warning to the world what happens when you ignore your debt problems for too long
Click to expand...

Your concept of how wealth inequality even came about is seriously a bit odd.

Lower taxes for the rich and trickle down is not the answer.
 
Pretty much this. If Assange was slamming Trump, the Ds on here would be wetting themselves with unbridled elation and he'd be their hero. But did you mean Sanders vs Trump? Even if Trump hadn't run, I doubt that Jeb! would've been the nominee.

Mondozei said:
Lots of tribal democrats in this thread. I don't think Wikileaks are pro-Trump. They're likely more pro-Sanders. They just hate the establishment. If it had been Sanders vs Bush, they'd likely focused on Bush.

This entire thread is a hilarious bucket of Clintonite tears. Your candidate sucks, just deal with it. (And BTW Trump is a disaster). It can't be fun having to choose between two god-awful candidates but that is America 2016.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top