Originally posted by: Ryan
Exactly - I'm in a situation right now relating to Home Owners Associations:
When I bought my townhouse, I was the first buyer in a lot of 6 houses. We bought the house, and the land - and were specific with the sellers that we did not want to live in a community with an association. A few months later, the second buyer was in the process of purchasing, and discovered that the land was illegally divided. This makes our townhouse a non-conforming structure - which from my perspective, now makes the house worthless. The builders have asked us to join the association, to bring the lot back into conformity - at that point, they will be able to continue selling the remainder of the houses and finish construction (the city forced the builders to stop construction after they discovered the illegal division).
We've told the builders that we will not join the association. We're now offering a buyback option to the builders, because we refuse to join.
Originally posted by: shira
I can't really speak about "planned communities." But in defense of HOAs:
When you are considering the purchase a home that is part of an HOA, you can (and should) view the CCRs (Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions) that apply to the community. CCRs typically spell out the types of changes and improvements that require approval of the Association. If prospective purchasers are uncomfortable with the restrictions in that community, they are free NOT to buy.
Consider this issue from the viewpoint of someone who wants to live in a community in which neighbors will not make changes that could significantly decrease property values or otherwise reduce the attractiveness of the area. For example, suppose your next-door neighbor wanted to erect at 100-foot ham-radio tower or a three-story greenhouse (and let's assume these structures are not otherwise barred by local zoning laws). Changes like those can SEVERELY reduce the value of nearby properties.
I live in a community governed by an HOA, and I know of no cases in which a property owner wanting to make a reasonable change has been denied permission by the association. It's when you have a "neighbor from hell" that you're awfully glad you have an HOA what will protect your interests.
Originally posted by: slash196
Originally posted by: shira
I can't really speak about "planned communities." But in defense of HOAs:
When you are considering the purchase a home that is part of an HOA, you can (and should) view the CCRs (Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions) that apply to the community. CCRs typically spell out the types of changes and improvements that require approval of the Association. If prospective purchasers are uncomfortable with the restrictions in that community, they are free NOT to buy.
Consider this issue from the viewpoint of someone who wants to live in a community in which neighbors will not make changes that could significantly decrease property values or otherwise reduce the attractiveness of the area. For example, suppose your next-door neighbor wanted to erect at 100-foot ham-radio tower or a three-story greenhouse (and let's assume these structures are not otherwise barred by local zoning laws). Changes like those can SEVERELY reduce the value of nearby properties.
I live in a community governed by an HOA, and I know of no cases in which a property owner wanting to make a reasonable change has been denied permission by the association. It's when you have a "neighbor from hell" that you're awfully glad you have an HOA what will protect your interests.
Zoning laws are restriction enough. My family had enough trouble with the city trying to get a fence built around our house; we don't need irrelevant and arbitrary rules to protect "property values". I have to wonder what kind of people judge houses based on the houses immediately around them. Anyway, when I buy a house it will be on private land outside of the city, and I'll do with it what I damn well please. The whitebred goose-steppers can keep their moronic bylaws.
Originally posted by: slash196
Originally posted by: shira
I can't really speak about "planned communities." But in defense of HOAs:
When you are considering the purchase a home that is part of an HOA, you can (and should) view the CCRs (Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions) that apply to the community. CCRs typically spell out the types of changes and improvements that require approval of the Association. If prospective purchasers are uncomfortable with the restrictions in that community, they are free NOT to buy.
Consider this issue from the viewpoint of someone who wants to live in a community in which neighbors will not make changes that could significantly decrease property values or otherwise reduce the attractiveness of the area. For example, suppose your next-door neighbor wanted to erect at 100-foot ham-radio tower or a three-story greenhouse (and let's assume these structures are not otherwise barred by local zoning laws). Changes like those can SEVERELY reduce the value of nearby properties.
I live in a community governed by an HOA, and I know of no cases in which a property owner wanting to make a reasonable change has been denied permission by the association. It's when you have a "neighbor from hell" that you're awfully glad you have an HOA what will protect your interests.
Zoning laws are restriction enough. My family had enough trouble with the city trying to get a fence built around our house; we don't need irrelevant and arbitrary rules to protect "property values". I have to wonder what kind of people judge houses based on the houses immediately around them. Anyway, when I buy a house it will be on private land outside of the city, and I'll do with it what I damn well please. The whitebred goose-steppers can keep their moronic bylaws.
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
I suppose there are some benefits to these communities...unfortunately, I suspect the people living in them would drive me postal.
Like I said...there are some benefits to living in a community, as you pointed out...however, the flip side is also true, particularly if the community is populated and controlled by aholes...I have heard some horror stories of preplanned community bliss that certainly make me skeptical...would much rather have my own lot of land, a house sitting on it, and no community fees, association fees, and every other additional cost that seems to go with living in these cookie cutter communities.Most of us in the neighborhood are "individuals," with our own personalities and interests. We don't want to make anyone "conform" to some narrow range of appearance. But we also don't want some a-hole making the neighborhood a mess. You wouldn't either.
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Like I said...there are some benefits to living in a community, as you pointed out...however, the flip side is also true, particularly if the community is populated and controlled by aholes...I have heard some horror stories of preplanned community bliss that certainly make me skeptical...would much rather have my own lot of land, a house sitting on it, and no community fees, association fees, and every other additional cost that seems to go with living in these cookie cutter communities.Most of us in the neighborhood are "individuals," with our own personalities and interests. We don't want to make anyone "conform" to some narrow range of appearance. But we also don't want some a-hole making the neighborhood a mess. You wouldn't either.
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Associations are not that bad (at least the ones I've lived with/under). As long as you read the contract and don't have any issues ....
Where I live now, there was a neighbor (and his guests) that parked "illegally" (private property, so no cops, but against the covenent/contract) and blocked my garage such that I couldn't get out easily. I asked him on several occasions, personally and by mail, and left (courteous) leaflets under his guest's windshield wipers asking them to park at the curb or in Guest parking.
They still did it.
I got some pictures and license plate numbers, faxed them to the association. Over time, they notified him by phone (he /his friends still did it), mail (he/his friends still did it), then a personal visit (he/his guests still did it).
Finally, they started charging him $50 per car for the first occurrance, and $100 for each subsequent occurrance (that I documented). His attitude was basically " let 'em charge me, I ain't paying.' He and his friends did stop, so I was OK with it.
Well, time came to where he wanted to sell the place. At closing, he found out that the charges were "assesments" and there was a lien on his place (so they couldn't complete the closing paperwork until he cleared the debt, plus interest).
So far, there's nothing I've wanted to do to the place (satellite dish, planters, etc) that haven't been approved b the association.
So far, so good, no complaints.
If you don't want to live under an association's rules, then (like most of the posters so far) don't move into a place governed by an association. The rules are spelled out pretty well, you just have to read the contract.
All that being said, the news story about the Peace Wreath Person Event had some other, less-than-honest/ethical stuff going on in the background ... something like the full board actually voted to allow the wreath, but the board president somehow overruled the vote ... I wasn't paying that much attention when I heard it.
I suppose it's like anything else, there's good ones and bad ones. I imagine this will end up in court with the Peace Wreath Person suing the association .... same ol' same ol'
Whatever.
Originally posted by: GoPackGo
Link
We live in America, but you give up a lot of rights when you buy a home in a "community" or "association".
Im glad I live in an old house in the middle of town.
==========================================
Subdivision Bans Wreath With Peace Sign
Homeowner Defies Board, Faces About $1000 in Fines
DENVER (Nov. 27) - A homeowners association in southwestern Colorado has threatened to fine a resident $25 a day until she removes a Christmas wreath with a peace sign that some say is an anti-Iraq war protest or a symbol of Satan.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: GoPackGo
Link
We live in America, but you give up a lot of rights when you buy a home in a "community" or "association".
Im glad I live in an old house in the middle of town.
==========================================
Subdivision Bans Wreath With Peace Sign
Homeowner Defies Board, Faces About $1000 in Fines
DENVER (Nov. 27) - A homeowners association in southwestern Colorado has threatened to fine a resident $25 a day until she removes a Christmas wreath with a peace sign that some say is an anti-Iraq war protest or a symbol of Satan.
Hey, they said it was a symbol of Satan, well Satan is just as protected as Jesus.
If it has to come down anything with Jesus has to come down.
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Associations are not that bad (at least the ones I've lived with/under). As long as you read the contract and don't have any issues ....
Where I live now, there was a neighbor (and his guests) that parked "illegally" (private property, so no cops, but against the covenent/contract) and blocked my garage such that I couldn't get out easily. I asked him on several occasions, personally and by mail, and left (courteous) leaflets under his guest's windshield wipers asking them to park at the curb or in Guest parking.
They still did it.
I got some pictures and license plate numbers, faxed them to the association. Over time, they notified him by phone (he /his friends still did it), mail (he/his friends still did it), then a personal visit (he/his guests still did it).
Finally, they started charging him $50 per car for the first occurrance, and $100 for each subsequent occurrance (that I documented). His attitude was basically " let 'em charge me, I ain't paying.' He and his friends did stop, so I was OK with it.
Well, time came to where he wanted to sell the place. At closing, he found out that the charges were "assesments" and there was a lien on his place (so they couldn't complete the closing paperwork until he cleared the debt, plus interest).
So far, there's nothing I've wanted to do to the place (satellite dish, planters, etc) that haven't been approved b the association.
So far, so good, no complaints.
If you don't want to live under an association's rules, then (like most of the posters so far) don't move into a place governed by an association. The rules are spelled out pretty well, you just have to read the contract.
All that being said, the news story about the Peace Wreath Person Event had some other, less-than-honest/ethical stuff going on in the background ... something like the full board actually voted to allow the wreath, but the board president somehow overruled the vote ... I wasn't paying that much attention when I heard it.
I suppose it's like anything else, there's good ones and bad ones. I imagine this will end up in court with the Peace Wreath Person suing the association .... same ol' same ol'
Whatever.
Or you could have grown a pair, put up a no parking sign violators will be towed, and had the cars towed. Oh I guess you would have to own some land to be able to do that.