Didn't you have a discussion on here a few years back about how fast forwarding commercials is theft?
Now having a VPN is defrauding? yeesh.
Man, I give you the recollection of the month award for that.
Not quite, but close.
The point is, entertainment like shows cost money to produce. If we don't pay for the shows directly - like an HBO subscription - there's an issue how we should pay.
And we should feel some obligation - basic fairness.
That's not a tight requirement - you must watch every commercial, you must purchase products advertised - but there is a good-faith exchange there where the money to pay for the entertainment comes from
the advertising and people purchasing based on that and if everyone 'skipped the ads', there would be no revenue - and you paid nothing for what you got that cost them money - and that's the issue.
It would also lead to the end of such shows, which is also bad.
And then there's the 'but not everyone WILL do that. I can skip the commercials but other suckers won't so it's all good'. And if you need that explained why it's not right I'm wasting time posting this.
So, I guess I would say skipping all commercials for a show where they're the revenue is a sort of moral theft - just be aware of some level of obligation for 'paying' for the show.
Your latest post though gets it more wrong.
I didn't say 'having a VPN' is, I said using a VPN to evade the region restriction on content is.
It's a judgment call for you to make whether it's ethical.
If the BBC puts those restrictions on because British citizens have paid for those shows with taxes, and they sell them in the US, the example in the article, yes I view that as theft.