• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why would anyone support a President that we have lost Jobs on his watch???

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jaskalas said:
What of the rest of P&N?

I would have to say Dave stands with the majority. The others guilty of blind partisanship are just not so clearly defined in so few words.
Click to expand...
Just follow the script.

Clinton was responsible for the massive internet economic boom during his presidency, but not responsible for the bust in Y2K. That was Bush's fault.

Bush was responsible for 9/11, all job losses during his tenure. His massive economic housing based/financial services boom was blind luck, however, was unlike the internet boom it was evil and he's fully responsible for the following bust.

And of course Obama is responsible for nothing during his tenure because Bush and the GOP fucked everything up so badly, and the Dems had absolutely nothing to do with it. In fact, nothing can be fixed until an extra-super-duper majority is in the house and senate, because dems are so diverse and open minded that then can't put together something they can all agree on, unlike the mindless republicans who vote in lockstep on everything.

Got it?
 
IGBT said:
he's a cult leader that satisfies liberals emotional pursuit. Remember the pied piper??
Click to expand...

The whole "Obama is the messiah, cult leader, etc" has gotten old. Aren't there real issues you can criticize and disagree with him about so that you do not have to use those lame jabs?
 
And 1.4 trillion dollars later...
stimulus-vs-unemployment-september-dots.gif


/Thread
 
A Republican Administration would lie about the unemployment stats and fiddle with what counts as unemployment to reduce the numbers, too. In fact, the Bush Administration even wanted to count fast food work as manufacturing! Nothing new to see here with the jpg that Patranus offered up, move along.
 
And here I thought this thread was going to be about it being the president's fault somehow if Steve Jobs died 🙁 damnit.
 
Barry has already saved, created or inflated 1 millllion jobs..... he is also in the process of losing a war in Afghanistan.
 
alchemize said:
Bush was responsible for 9/11, all job losses during his tenure. His massive economic housing based/financial services boom was blind luck, however, was unlike the internet boom it was evil and he's fully responsible for the following bust.
Click to expand...

Bush deserves a huge amount of the blame. Why didn't Bush end the H-1B and L-1 visa programs that displace Americans from often college-education-requiring knowledge-based jobs? Why didn't he end foreign outsourcing? Why didn't he end mass legal immigration and illegal immigration instead of pushing for illegal alien amnesty?

And of course Obama is responsible for nothing during his tenure because Bush and the GOP fucked everything up so badly, and the Dems had absolutely nothing to do with it.
Click to expand...

Obama deserves blame for not doing what I have suggested above and certainly the Democrats deserve blame as well, but so do the Republicans. Obama can't be blamed for the overall state of the economy yet, though. The most you can blame him for is a failure to change the course of the economy that he inherited.

I agree that Obama will fail and that he will prove to be a bad president, but no worse than or perhaps less worse than McCain or any other Republican or Democrat would have been. Both of our political parties are horrible, it's just that the Republicans a little worse than the Democrats (and also want to regulate what goes on in our bedrooms and private lives).
 
I just don't understand Barry has saved, created or inflated 1 millllion jobs yet the unemployment climes to 10.2%.

That's our Barry and the Dimocratic party, they don't let facts get in the way of their lies.
 
bl4ckfl4g said:
Things don't turn around over night. Didn't job losses peak in January (when he was only pres for a few days) and we've lost less every month since then. I could be wrong but I think I read that.
Click to expand...

When you get to throw in a $1T stimulus, think about doing a second one, and get to run a $1.5T deficit, they certainly should turn around over night.

That is, unless you used the stimulus to fund useless things.
 
Budmantom said:
I just don't understand Barry has saved, created or inflated 1 millllion jobs yet the unemployment climes to 10.2%.

That's our Barry and the Dimocratic party, they don't let facts get in the way of their lies.
Click to expand...

The actual number is 600,000 so far; with 50% dispersed; taking the cost/job saved to $300K.
Tell me the free market can't do more with $300K. Government is a joke.
 
soccerballtux said:
When you get to throw in a $1T stimulus, think about doing a second one, and get to run a $1.5T deficit, they certainly should turn around over night.

That is, unless you used the stimulus to fund useless things.
Click to expand...

You obviously don't know what you are talking about so I'll forgive your ignorance. You expect the unemployment problem to disappear overnight? delusional much?
 
bl4ckfl4g said:
You obviously don't know what you are talking about so I'll forgive your ignorance. You expect the unemployment problem to disappear overnight? delusional much?
Click to expand...

Just holding him accountable to his word. *GASP* we can't do that now can we???
For some reason we can when it's a Republican President. But not when it's a Liberal president.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top