i got lucky and bought $100k worth of stock on Oct 3, one day b4 the s&p briefly dipped into bear territory. i got it 3% from the 52week low!![]()
should have waited an hr.. oh well.
anyway, since then up 30% in 3weeks
go ME!
sigh.. bloodbath today. should have sold yesterday.
missed my sell price yesterday by $0.25/share which is only a few hundred $ vs 5 figure profit.
should have just sold at market price at market close.
and tommorow doesnt look good because Europe's debt resolution meeting is in jeporady. Italy isnt supporting a 2yr hike in retirement age since they're probably next in line needing a bailout.![]()
sigh.. bloodbath today. should have sold yesterday.
sigh.. bloodbath today. should have sold yesterday.
missed my sell price yesterday by $0.25/share which is only a few hundred $ vs 5 figure profit.
should have just sold at market price at market close.
and tommorow doesnt look good because Europe's debt resolution meeting is in jeporady. Italy isnt supporting a 2yr hike in retirement age since they're probably next in line needing a bailout.![]()
Have to fatten up the pigs before you slaughter them again.
not that likely during earnings season. Still double-digit YoY increases in net profits expected in the U.S. An outright recession now seems unlikely, so the remaining major risk is if Europe's sovereign debt crisis is a zombie that keeps coming back. At a glance, it sounds like Germany and France are able to save themselves.This is what I was just thinking. Big crash imminent?
not that likely during earnings season. Still double-digit YoY increases in net profits expected in the U.S. An outright recession now seems unlikely, so the remaining major risk is if Europe's sovereign debt crisis is a zombie that keeps coming back. At a glance, it sounds like Germany and France are able to save themselves.
hate to go partisan on you, but how could I forget the GOP Congressional caucus gets to hold a gun to everybody's head and threaten default every quarter until the presidential election.We still got the US Gov who has since been downgraded by S&P unable to agree on a budget to lower its debt. Once the media starts beating that dead horse again at the end of the year, I'm sure the market will react in kind.
it'll be party city thanks tosolvingkicking the EU debt problems down the road until the end of November when the 'Super Committee' will announce they are deadlocked and cannot come up with a compromise and the auto-chop kicks in
then the market will tank for the holidays
I always find it highly amusing that every news story about the market is headlined like this "Markets [fell/rose] today due to [random other news headline]"
While I'm sure that current events do have a effect on the market, it's not like its a 1-1 thing. I see it like you'd measure someone's mood. If someone is happy today (ie, markets going up) it might be because of this other good thing that happened, it's sunny today, their favorite team won, whatever. But you can also be sad some days when good things happen, and vice versa, and sometimes it's "just because". Anyway, just find it amusing that journalists always feel the need to figure out a reason for why the market did what it did.
Anyway, just wanted to get that rant out. So in my mind, to answer your question, 50% of it is due to "good news" the other 50% "just because"
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=912107698547747613&postID=8549580978249768713"I suspect, or at least hope, that the teaching moment will not be lost on the Germans. They appear to think that compliance with the law is beneficial.
As for the EFSF, we are a long ways from Wall Street and the rest of the bankers getting their hands on this cash.
Part of the reason for my optimism is that the NY Times and the Wall Street Journal have finally begun focusing on the issue of investors not trusting banks.
This is a major, major shift.
Suddenly, investors who are questioning the solvency of US banks are being heard from - all they need to do is focus on derivatives.
More importantly, these investors are asking for granular level data - not assurance from bank executives or regulators.
This movement has implications for how the EU addresses its problems. Merkel intends to do "everything necessary" to ensure banks are recapitalized and investors believe it.
If she follows through, part of everything necessary will be massive disclosure of granular data by the banks.
Yes, this pushes out the timing of when banks are recapitalized (say 3 -5 years). But what is important is it also stops the Wall Street and the bankers from getting their hands on the EFSF funds.
The beauty of disclosure is that investors will be happy to wait knowing that it is coming."