What does that have to do with angry liberals losing their temper in this thread?
It's that glass houses thing.
What does that have to do with angry liberals losing their temper in this thread?
No, it's completely opportunistic to lead progressives on that he's one of them, while behaving rather conservatively (eg. continuing bush policy no less). Or reliably flopping on gay marriage when the winds shifted. Christ, literally in the same post you rationalize why he has to be opportunistic.
Seems beyond obvious how Clinton's lack of political charisma as demonstrated in you & peers' opinion of her similar approach to governance is a major flaw .
Is that your private, or public, position?
Shit don't answer that, that info is a Russian plant! Leftards...lulz...
No wonder the conservatives will never find chucky when out hunting for the Real racists. He literally behaves exactly like they do other than maybe proclaiming the klan too moderate.
Hey, I'm flexible: Will the Klan ensure garbage isn't floating around like pollen and housing values aren't at Detroit levels?
Also, no one here is out 'hunting for racists', as that'd be racist (I mean, minorities are the most racist of all, easily, so by hunting for racists you'd essentially be targeting minorities more than whites...see how Progressive we are?)
No, pretty sure they've been busy hunting for the Real racists since they've having real trouble finding any among their own.
Fail, this may come as a surprise to your programming, but, there are posters here who don't have to revert all the worlds ills to racist FailLogic like you're programmed with. In fact, other than yourself and perhaps one or two others, this is basically everyone else. AaaaaandFailresponse....
Ah, now you're going full Moonie and claiming that anyone not staggering along and chanting "brains" with whatever obscenity the DNC shoves forward is a Trump supporter. If your candidate can only win as long as everyone pretends she is not flawed, then she doesn't deserve to win, period.There could only be one winner- Clinton or Trump. You enabled Trump entirely by tearing Clinton down incessantly, as did a lot of people. The results are as much your doing as those who voted for Trump. Man up & own it.
But WE aren't the ones pretending that Hillary's only flaw is that other people wrongly assume she has flaws.No, it's completely opportunistic to lead progressives on that he's one of them, while behaving rather conservatively (eg. continuing bush policy no less). Or reliably flopping on gay marriage when the winds shifted. Christ, literally in the same post you rationalize why he has to be opportunistic.
Seems beyond obvious how Clinton's lack of political charisma as demonstrated in you & peers' opinion of her similar approach to governance is a major flaw .
Ah, now you're going full Moonie and claiming that anyone not staggering along and chanting "brains" with whatever obscenity the DNC shoves forward is a Trump supporter. If your candidate can only win as long as everyone pretends she is not flawed, then she doesn't deserve to win, period.
But WE aren't the ones pretending that Hillary's only flaw is that other people wrongly assume she has flaws.
Good thing you agree your ideas about blacks/klan/etc are very popular,
and here I was worried it might ever be hard to show much that sort of thinking is integrated into this country.
For example, not too long ago Brad here was disputing that systemic racist was a problem,
but your thoughts and the conservatives' predicable silence on the matter sure put that to rest.
Are they?
LOL, what we know Fail is they're integrated in you. You could call it...you're programming...
He'd clearly be wrong: Minorities are terribly racist, not just against Whites (with social impunity) but against other minorities as well. See, we agree on something!
Of course we're not that vocal on the matter, we're not nearly as racist as Leftards and I'm sure don't possess the levels of White Guilt they do. Maybe you need to go do some programming dips over at DailyKos and/or HuffPo? Get the validation you (Fail to get here) need?![]()
lol +1I can't believe after all these years of liberals supressing their anger it has risen to the top again.
I can't believe after all these years of liberals supressing their anger it has risen to the top again.
lol +1
It's truly amazing that in the midst of all this hate and vitriol, the left is still decrying angry white men and angry white Trump voters.
I'm no Hildabeast fan, but being elected Senator and made SecState are accomplishments. Personally I'd prefer to see how someone performs as a governor and builds a for-profit private business, but both Senate and SecState experience are useful experience for the Presidency. Both also allow a candidate to show character or lack thereof.
Mo debinitely. I know some true die hard yellow dog Democrats who voted for Trump simply because they so despise Hillary. Apparently those Russians have been running psyops for decades.
Actually both you and agent said pretty much that exact thing.
So let's summarize here. Conservatives largely agree with your take on race & whatnot, and leftards are the Real racists. Seems to perfectly explain their shared rhetoric.
The problem with that is she won her first elected office seat in the safe blue state of NY after being First Lady. As they say, the first million is the toughest. She has never served in state legislature, school board, etc. And she faced no opposition in the party primary there either. The field was cleared for her by the party.
As for Secretary of State, same thing. And what did she accomplish there? She was too chicken to try to find peace between Israel and Palestine. Her biggest project was the disastrous war in Libya and pushing for more involvement in Syria. I don't think she made good calls there, and reading accounts of Libya she was too easily suckered by smooth talking Muslim freedom fighters who say the right things.
you and roflmouth should pen a book, well maybe a short story, ok, maybe a haiku...Oh Fail...lol...
you and roflmouth should pen a book, well maybe a short story, ok, maybe a haiku...
The problem with that is she won her first elected office seat in the safe blue state of NY after being First Lady. As they say, the first million is the toughest. She has never served in state legislature, school board, etc. And she faced no opposition in the party primary there either. The field was cleared for her by the party.
As for Secretary of State, same thing. And what did she accomplish there? She was too chicken to try to find peace between Israel and Palestine. Her biggest project was the disastrous war in Libya and pushing for more involvement in Syria. I don't think she made good calls there, and reading accounts of Libya she was too easily suckered by smooth talking Muslim freedom fighters who say the right things.
The first million is the toughest, says someone referring to an election against Donald J Trump, notable for earning his first million.
Why is there this level of scrutiny against a woman while a ludicrously unqualified man skates to the top? Do me a favor and answer without whinging about identity politics.
