WHY THE HELL DOESNT IE SUPPORT PNGS?????

[Alienwho]

Yeah okay

First of all, as already mentioned, it looks like crap either way.

Second of all, PNG is NOT A WEB FRIENDLY FORMAT. PGN file sizes are HUGE, not download friendly.

Third of all, if you knew how to save the gifs correctly it would look fine (the quality i mean, not the fact that the site is ugly regardless of the format you save it in).

 

[daniel1113]

Originally posted by: Alienwho
Yeah okay

First of all, as already mentioned, it looks like crap either way.

Second of all, PNG is NOT A WEB FRIENDLY FORMAT. PGN file sizes are HUGE, not download friendly.

Third of all, if you knew how to save the gifs correctly it would look fine (the quality i mean, not the fact that the site is ugly regardless of the format you save it in).

Winnar!

My addition: Come back and post after you've learned some simple html and graphic design skills.

 

[asm0deus]

Originally posted by: necine
thats the ugliest website i've ever seen.

 

[SagaLore]

Wow, whatever graphic editing software you're using SUCKS.

I use Adobe Photoshop to create all my GIFs, and they're end up both high quality and small file size.

 

[illusion88]

Originally posted by: The Pentium Guy
I DONT CARE how crappy the rest looks. That was all BS that I put on there. For now, focus on the "title" thingy.

good thing you replied first, cause the rest of it looks like a dirty ass.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: MrCodeDude
Ugliest website ever. With or without the .png transparency.

:thumbsup::beer:

 

[loup garou]

:laugh:

 

[SuperSix]

Originally posted by: necine
thats the ugliest website i've ever seen.

Yep.. Nuke the whole thingm and get someone esle to do one for you.

 

[skace]

I didn't know IE had a built in ugly filter, BUT THANK GOD!

 

[MrChad]

LMAO @ this thread. :laugh:

 

[Injury]

Originally posted by: The Pentium Guy
I DONT CARE how crappy the rest looks. That was all BS that I put on there. For now, focus on the "title" thingy.

You used an image in front of an image. Why the hell wouldn't you just make it the background of the image on top the same background that is behind it?

Even if you suck at HTML it's not that hard to do it seamlessly.

edit: Don't even say so you can have the heading span the width of a screen. With widescreen monitors becoming popular, that is one of the worst design flaws ever.

 

[mercanucaribe]

It was NEVER looking good.