• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why Texas didn't have any looting

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: Tommunist
hey - how come they are all white guys?

because white people don't loot.







😛

funny... 😉 Bring on the FLAMES by people who can't take a joke.

There were 10 cases in Galveston of people breaking into houses. Reportedly, one of them got caught, and it turned out to be a refugee from NO. That made me laugh.
 
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: Tommunist
hey - how come they are all white guys?

because white people don't loot.







😛

funny... 😉 Bring on the FLAMES by people who can't take a joke.

There were 10 cases in Galveston of people breaking into houses. Reportedly, one of them got caught, and it turned out to be a refugee from NO. That made me laugh.

Haha ... irony?
 
Originally posted by: KLin
What the hell is that hand cannon that the guy on the left side of the sign is holding? :Q

"I know what you're thinking. "Did he fire six shots or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?"
 
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.

That would make sense that you think so judging from your name.. One of the principles of communism is that the average person is unfit/bad so a strongarm government is necessary.
 
Originally posted by: KLin
What the hell is that hand cannon that the guy on the left side of the sign is holding? :Q

Taurus Raging Bull chambered for .454 or a S&W .500 Magnum I would guess.

EDIT: I am voting for S&W .500 Magnum, but that is based on a very pixellated enlarged image.

Definitely doesn't look like a Raging Bull, the barrel is wrong.
 
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.

That would make sense that you think so judging from your name.. One of the principles of communism is that the average person is unfit/bad so a strongarm government is necessary.

i'm not a communist - note the subtle spelling difference 🙂. most people i know don't have the common sense required to be safe with a firearm. not saying no one should have them but it doesn't need to be encouraged.

also: not sure where in communism it says that about people. in order for communism to work it would require a group entirely composed of "good" people. since this isn't the case communism is unlikely to work.
 
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.
So would I. But as long as criminals/idiots can get guns, I want to be at least as well armed as they are.
 
Originally posted by: phantom309
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.
So would I. But as long as criminals/idiots can get guns, I want to be at least as well armed as they are.

i didn't say i don't think people should be able to get guns - i'd just prefer it if most didn't 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.

That would make sense that you think so judging from your name.. One of the principles of communism is that the average person is unfit/bad so a strongarm government is necessary.

i'm not a communist - note the subtle spelling difference 🙂. most people i know don't have the common sense required to be safe with a firearm. not saying no one should have them but it doesn't need to be encouraged.

also: not sure where in communism it says that about people. in order for communism to work it would require a group entirely composed of "good" people. since this isn't the case communism is unlikely to work.

Maybe you should get some smarter friends. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.

Hitler felt the same way, neighbor. I agree that I'm happier knowing that some people can't legally get guns... but given a choice between 'bad guys and cops have guns, I have a target on my forehead' vs 'bad guys have to wonder if I'm carrying' I like it the way we are.
 
Originally posted by: Biggerhammer
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.

Hitler felt the same way, neighbor. I agree that I'm happier knowing that some people can't legally get guns... but given a choice between 'bad guys and cops have guns, I have a target on my forehead' vs 'bad guys have to wonder if I'm carrying' I like it the way we are.
I'd say this thread has a lot more in common with Hitler then Tommunists comments.
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Biggerhammer
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: brxndxn
That's how it oughta be in every state.. The more people with weapons, the safer society becomes, because MOST people are GOOD people. Shoot the bad people.

rrrriiiiigghhttt. judging by the average intelligence/maturity level in this country I'd rather most poeple didn't have guns.

Hitler felt the same way, neighbor. I agree that I'm happier knowing that some people can't legally get guns... but given a choice between 'bad guys and cops have guns, I have a target on my forehead' vs 'bad guys have to wonder if I'm carrying' I like it the way we are.
I'd say this thread has a lot more in common with Hitler then Tommunists comments.


Like what? Please explain.
 
Wow, from a pic of white guys with guns to Hitler in 3 pages! Not a record but still pretty good. I call Godwin's law.
 
Back
Top