Things naturally go into a state of less order and decay, not increased order. The idea of blowing up something big and somehow making galaxies is retarded. The idea that stuff has gotten more complex by itself is retarded. Totally goes against the laws of thermodynamics.
Oy....not the thermodynamics crap again.
Ok, fine, we'll do this once more.
Earth: Things increase in order here, at least in some respects. (The core of the planet continues to cool of course, losing energy in the process. But let's look elsewhere, towards the crust.)
Life arose here from nonlife, and then increased in size and so on, which is arguably an increase in complexity. How?
IF Earth were a closed system, that'd be somewhat unlikely....well, ok, even then it wouldn't be. You'd still have energy available, in the form of chemical energy. Provide enough nutrients (chemical energy) to a life form, and it might be able to grow and reproduce itself, at least up to the point where the energy source is exhausted. In that respect, you get a localized increase in complexity at the expense of another location.
But back to Earth in general. Closed system, right? Wrong.
Here's how to violate Christian/I.D. Thermodynamics in one word:
Sunlight.
Earth receives an immense amount of energy, thus complexity is free to increase. That of course comes at the expense of an increase in entropy, which was defined for me as "a measure of the amount of useless energy in a system", in the Sun. It constantly converts energetic nuclear fuels into energy, which it radiates out in all directions. As the atoms become larger and larger, they yield ever-decreasing amounts of energy during fusion.
And so, our localized increases in complexity come at the expense of increasing entropy in another system.
Expand that out to the Universe. Boom, splat, squirt - whatever the Universe did initially to spew out space, time, and energy - made available a great deal of potential energy, and it was all over the place. A lot of it condensed out into hydrogen, which does still have a lot of potential energy, now bound up into a portable package. However, you were also left with a great deal of empty, non-complex space. Once again, you got localized complexity (atoms) at the expense of another location, which would have been previously occupied by some form of energy.
Simple thermodynamics.
But never mind all that. It doesn't fit what you guys want to believe, so you'll find some way to ignore it or attempt to discredit it
Or we can discredit it because it's....you know.....
wrong, and is a distortion of thermodynamics, only as a consequence of ignorance of how the damn rules work.
I dont look down upon you or anyone else. It is sad you wont be going to heaven, but thats your choice, not mine.
Delicious lulz.
Provide Evidence of Design, then we'll talk.
And please, do so without citing any holy texts. From what I hear, God/deity/whatever is soooo obvious, that it shouldn't need any of our ancient tales to prove its existence.
Also, as is mentioned numerous times, using the Bible to try to prove God's existence because the Bible says he exists - that is circular logic, and in the real world, circular logic doesn't prove
anything of value. Simple as that.
Facebook
Twitter