- May 14, 2012
- 6,762
- 1
- 0
A piece that might surprise some from the WSJ. Quite balanced and rather interesting... and pretty much where I am on this issue.
It was posted in P&N this morning but it took only a couple of dozen replies to degenerate into irrational responses and insults, so I'm reposting it here to see if we can do better.
The article is long and it moves back and forth, so it's worth reading, but a few quotes:
The bottom line: gun owners have to speak up, take responsibility for themselves, and stop allowing people like Wayne LaPierre to be seen as representing them, when he does not. People are tired of Newtowns and of 7-year-olds picking up unsecured guns and killing or maiming themselves. Ignoring this issue, or being one of the extremists who says "NO TO ANY CHANGES!" just increases the likelihood of onerous gun control laws being passed in the future.
It was posted in P&N this morning but it took only a couple of dozen replies to degenerate into irrational responses and insults, so I'm reposting it here to see if we can do better.
The article is long and it moves back and forth, so it's worth reading, but a few quotes:
Believe it or not, what's missing from the current shout-fest over guns and gun control is the voice of gun owners.
...
As for those on the gun-control side, they often go beyond calling for policy changes, about which reasonable people can disagree, and issue broad-brush insults that aren't acceptable in other contexts. When sportscaster Bob Costas blames "gun culture" for the murder-suicide of an NFL linebacker, gun owners say, "Wait a minute. I'm gun culture. And my guns haven't hurt anybody."
A lot of assumptions are made about gun owners, by the NRA and gun-control proponents alike. What nobody ever seems to do, though, is listen to them.
...
Although I did my best to avoid gun politics, the subject came up constantly. What came through loudest of all was that gun guys feel insulted. The caustic and routine dismissal of "gun culture" is only part of it. Gun guys look at the most strident advocates of gun control and say, "You know nothing about what it means to handle guns, but you presume to make judgments about my ability to do so."
From Arizona to Michigan, I found America full of working people who won't listen to Democrats about anything because of the party's identification with gun control. A parks-and-recreation worker in Wisconsin told me he was offended by the Democrats' view "that guns are for the unwashed, the yokels." It's hard to think of a better organizing tool for the right than the left's tribal antipathy to guns.
...
But my fellow gun guys have plenty to answer for, too. We don't live in a vacuum. Our guns affect everybody, and the non-gun-owning public has a right to expect things to improve. More than ever, after the transformative horror of Sandy Hook, the old defensive crouch is inadequate. If gun culture is to survive, gun guys need to get in the game. If we want to hold on to our guns, we need to be part of the solution.
...
The wrongest of wrong hands for guns aren't necessarily those of criminals but of curious children and depressed teenagers. Accidental child death is one of the few gun statistics that has grown worse since 1999. Teenage gun suicide is a lot lower than it was in 1999, but it's still heartbreakingly high. Almost half the teenagers who kill themselves do it with a gun, and, unlike those who try it with pills, car exhaust, razorblades, or a rope, they almost always succeed.
Where are those children and teenagers getting the guns? Not from gun stores, thanks to age minimums. Not from gun shows, either, unless they're getting an adult to buy them. And not from some murky "illegal gun market." They're getting them, by and large, from adults who leave them around, where immature hands can find them.
...
We gun guys are operating under a double standard. We want to be left alone to buy, use and carry guns because, we say, we understand firearms better than any bureaucrat. But at the same time, enough of us behave so carelessly that thousands of people are needlessly killed, injured or victimized every year by guns left lying around.
...
Gun guys are right to object to government officials who propose sweeping gun controls without understanding guns. But until they take responsibility for the gun violence that so frightens their fellow citizens, they're setting themselves up for more regulation. Taking collective responsibility for social problems is not the same thing as knuckling under to a tyrannical government. In fact, it's the opposite.
The bottom line: gun owners have to speak up, take responsibility for themselves, and stop allowing people like Wayne LaPierre to be seen as representing them, when he does not. People are tired of Newtowns and of 7-year-olds picking up unsecured guns and killing or maiming themselves. Ignoring this issue, or being one of the extremists who says "NO TO ANY CHANGES!" just increases the likelihood of onerous gun control laws being passed in the future.