why no 2 core bulldozer?

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,498
7,753
136
First of all, Bulldozer is meant to be a high end part. Llano has the dual core portion of the market covered. It's the same reason that Intel doesn't offer any dual core EE chips.

Also, after a certain point making only two cores just isn't worth it, much like you don't see either Intel or AMD making single core chips. Eventually the entry level Intel chips will be quads.
 

drizek

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,410
0
71
Because AMD needs 2x as many cores to compete with Intel, and Intel doesn't sell single core CPUs anymore.
 

yottabit

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,671
874
146
anyone got any insight or theories? just curious

Wikipedia lists a 2 core Bulldozer module to be released, the FX-2150. Have plans for this been axed?

EDIT: Hrm, curious... following the link to Wikipedia's source the FX-2150 has been eliminated from the Xbitlabs article (or it was never there).

I wonder if the performance doesn't scale well with the lower cores?

I imagine it doesn't get the attention of the higher core models
 
Last edited:

lau808

Senior member
Jun 25, 2011
217
0
71
that's alright, 4 is good. now if we can just get the damn things released already, not that i can afford 1 yet, i wanna see reviews and overclocks!
 

toyota

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
12,957
1
0
because by the time its actually released even Celerons will be quad core...
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
First of all, Bulldozer is meant to be a high end part. Llano has the dual core portion of the market covered. It's the same reason that Intel doesn't offer any dual core EE chips.

Also, after a certain point making only two cores just isn't worth it, much like you don't see either Intel or AMD making single core chips. Eventually the entry level Intel chips will be quads.


Arent all Llano chips quad core?? Oh thats right, it takes four cores from AMD to compete with Intel's i3 2100.
 

ShadowVVL

Senior member
May 1, 2010
758
0
71
I wouldn't mind a dual core BD I usualy dont ever use more then 2 cores on my everyday system. I want a dual core with no igp thats why i was hoping for a dual core bd.
 

Arkadrel

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2010
3,681
2
0
anyone got any insight or theories? just curious

There will be 2 core (1 modual) and 4 core (2 modual) bulldozer chips, when they start makeing the next APU's.

The ones that ll replace the Llano.



for now though, the first gen bulldozer chips out, will be for the highend.
Those will come in 8 to 16 core processor chips.
 

Arzachel

Senior member
Apr 7, 2011
903
76
91
Arent all Llano chips quad core?? Oh thats right, it takes four cores from AMD to compete with Intel's i3 2100.

...Really? Do you also think that p4 had to be superior to k7 because "MEGAHURTZ MEAN POWAH!"? Performance per watt and performance per $, thats all that matters.
 

bridito

Senior member
Jun 2, 2011
350
0
0
I want to start a thread "Why No 4 or 8 core Bulldozers?" :)

P.S. to both JF-AMD + IntelEnthusiast... if you think I'm getting antsy about all the CPU delays... you're right! I have a system to build and I feel like I've been left in the waiting room while the place closed up for the summer! :)
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Because AMD needs 2x as many cores to compete with Intel, and Intel doesn't sell single core CPUs anymore.

Yes they do. Socket 775 Core 2 based Celerons have single core models (420/430/440) Also, see below.

because by the time its actually released even Celerons will be quad core...

Supposedly there will be a single core Sandy Bridge Celeron.