gsellis
Diamond Member
- Dec 4, 2003
- 6,061
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: gsellis
Link to Microsoft's Vista giveaway?
You got me there. No way to dispute that logic.
I hit the freaking return key opening quote...
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: gsellis
Link to Microsoft's Vista giveaway?
Originally posted by: gsellis
I hit the freaking return key opening quote...errr... reply is now above.
CTP man...
Alphabet drives annoy me too. Unfortunately, the masses are now use to them, flawed as it is. I like the file structure a bit too, but then again, first computer was an Apple IIe.Originally posted by: nweaver
File structure: Linux makes sense. You mount things in your tree, you don't assign it a letter. after using it for a few weeks, I quickly saw the advantages to the file structure.
Linspire/Lindows: Don't judge Linux based on that steaming pile of poo. It's like me saying "Yep, tried windows 95, it sucked and crashed, so windows must suck".
Originally posted by: nweaver
Lindows/linspire caters to noobs (not a bad thing) but dumps them to a GUI desktop as root without asking for a password. This is bad, it's kinda like windows dumping people as admin by default (which it sounds like is getting fixed in vista)
Originally posted by: stash
Can't believe I'm doing this...
So? Users have no need to mess around in there.Have you ever looked inside C:\WINDOWS and C:\WINDOWS\System32? It's a complete mess in there. You have both executables and libraries jammed inside the same folder along with seemingly random bitmaps of wallpapers and screensavers.
Where will I find my windows programs? Well in C:\ C:\program files C:\developer_name\ C:\publisher\developer\
Originally posted by: stash
Where will I find my windows programs? Well in C:\ C:\program files C:\developer_name\ C:\publisher\developer\
Apps like these are not following Windows Logo guidelines. Usually if they aren't following the file location guidelines, they don't work properly with least privilege If it concerns you, don't use apps that suck.
Is there anything keeping me from writing an app that doesn't put libs in /lib, etc? (That's an honest question)
Originally posted by: Chosonman
This is simply an idiotic statement. If you had any real insite you would have something smart to say rather than a smart ass response.Originally posted by: rbrandon
troll much?
Originally posted by: Chosonman
Originally posted by: gsellis
No, his insight is clear. This is trollish.
Answer me this. Have you installed and used the latest version of Ubuntu, Fedora Core, or Suse? No? I thought so.
Originally posted by: stash
Where will I find my windows programs? Well in C:\ C:\program files C:\developer_name\ C:\publisher\developer\
Apps like these are not following Windows Logo guidelines. Usually if they aren't following the file location guidelines, they don't work properly with least privilege If it concerns you, don't use apps that suck.
Is there anything keeping me from writing an app that doesn't put libs in /lib, etc? (That's an honest question)
Originally posted by: rbrandon
Originally posted by: Chosonman
Originally posted by: gsellis
No, his insight is clear. This is trollish.
Answer me this. Have you installed and used the latest version of Ubuntu, Fedora Core, or Suse? No? I thought so.
I dual boot between windows and debian, as a matter of fact. so, i ask again, troll much?
Is there anything keeping me from writing an app that doesn't put libs in /lib, etc? (That's an honest question)
Most package managment stuff requires some things, such as man pages and files put in a specific location
I tried Ubuntu recently but it wouldn't recognize the modem in my laptop so I had to ditch it. I can't use an os that won't connect to the internet.
Also, using the command line sucks in this day of mile long file names. I had no problems in the old dos 8.3 file name system, but I'm not a typeist and trying to deal with long directory structures and huge file names was too much.
Your new friends: autocomplete, grepOriginally posted by: lxskllr
I tried Ubuntu recently but it wouldn't recognize the modem in my laptop so I had to ditch it. I can't use an os that won't connect to the internet.
Also, using the command line sucks in this day of mile long file names. I had no problems in the old dos 8.3 file name system, but I'm not a typeist and trying to deal with long directory structures and huge file names was too much.
Originally posted by: Chosonman
Microsoft is the future.
Microsoft isnt free and will be forever.
Microsoft is supported by the open source community and the Microsoft communities all over the web
Microsoft is secure.
Microsoft is not Linux
Microsoft is the future.
In the server market continues to outpace Linux in server deployments. The desktop arena continues to see spectacular growth, especially with the exploding popularity of Windows XP in just the past year and a half and Vista in the near future. Microsoft's CE is already used as the main operating system in just about every devices including PDA's, Cell phones, pocket PC's, notebooks and desktops, and media centers.
Microsoft isn't free and never will be.
For only £365 you have all of the MS Software Library sent to you every single month on DVD or CD. As well as software their entire support database is indexed and betas , previews and utilities. This all for less than the cost of the very specific hardware I had to buy to get a semi-usable Linux desktop the last time I built one.
Microsoft is supported by the open source community.
Microsoft is supported by millions and millions of individuals who are committed to and skilled in their work. Patches and security updates for serious flaws are released on a zero day basis and service packs regularly roll up all these changes as well as providing additional functionality and enhancements.
Microsoft is secure.
As of right now there are more virus written for Windows than any other operating system yet as long as users have a clue-stick to beat themselves with they will not be affected. And with help of the Microsoft community, patches and fixes for future virus for Microsoft can be resolved as soon as they are written. Not weeks or months.
Microsoft is not Linux.
Linux is not Microsoft. You don't need to listen to the terrible attempts at startup sounds (ubuntu?), watch the lines of green and black text as you boot, or use the Internet Explorer to view your files, or have microft software bundled with your OS. Or believe that everything a linux distro has handed you in the PC world is the way it should be. You can used tabbed folder view instead of pressing "back back back" to navigate through your folders. You can customize your splash screen to replace you Windows loading logo. You can make your OS look like a Mac if you like.
And Microsoft has always been the most supported operating system by both software and hardware companies....
Adobe has always had a Microsoft division, all hardware OEM's bundle Microsoft drivers with their products and as of now Microsoft supports the vast majority of hardware pluggins right out of the box. Believe it or not Microsoft is here to stay.
Please contribute as you wish to this thread..
Originally posted by: lxskllr
I tried Ubuntu recently but it wouldn't recognize the modem in my laptop so I had to ditch it. I can't use an os that won't connect to the internet.
Also, using the command line sucks in this day of mile long file names. I had no problems in the old dos 8.3 file name system, but I'm not a typeist and trying to deal with long directory structures and huge file names was too much.
Originally posted by: Seeruk
Really.... truly ..... honestly I tried to walk away from this thread. But such FUD and fanboyism needs to be shown the error of it's ways![]()
Originally posted by: lxskllr
I tried Ubuntu recently but it wouldn't recognize the modem in my laptop so I had to ditch it. I can't use an os that won't connect to the internet.
Also, using the command line sucks in this day of mile long file names. I had no problems in the old dos 8.3 file name system, but I'm not a typeist and trying to deal with long directory structures and huge file names was too much.
Originally posted by: Cerb
Your new friends: autocomplete, grepOriginally posted by: lxskllr
I tried Ubuntu recently but it wouldn't recognize the modem in my laptop so I had to ditch it. I can't use an os that won't connect to the internet.
Also, using the command line sucks in this day of mile long file names. I had no problems in the old dos 8.3 file name system, but I'm not a typeist and trying to deal with long directory structures and huge file names was too much.
(I don't know jack about regular expressions--I use grep with very simple literal string matching)
...and don't complain about Linux and file names just yet!
/home/username/mylongisoinatarredbzip2file
or
~/mylongisoinatarredbzip2file
vs.
C:\Documents and Settings\username\My Documents\mylongisoinatarredbzip2file
Oh, yeah, spaces, too. The command-line is handy in Windows, too, but it has the mile long file names...
Finally, note you can use Autocomplete in cmd.exe in Windows, and you can get grep for Windows.
