• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why isn't Warren Harding widely regarded/recognized as a savior of the Republic?

A

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
After all, the dude reversed (for awhile) the damage done by Wilson and he opposed the precursor to the American Sovereignty-destroying UN and its New World Order.

In your opinion, is it accurate to say that Harding was the true Presidential Savior of the Republic (because, by rejecting the Treaty of Versailles and the UN, he fought for our sovereignty like no man who was President other than Thomas Jefferson)?

Thomas Jefferson was the creator, Hamilton/Washington (with his support for the Jay Treaty and the mercantilists), Lincoln (destroyed the Founding Principles), and Wilson (got the ball rolling, Harding reversed it, but then Wilson's disciple FDR resurrected the NWO) were the Destroyers, and Harding is the first Savior of the Republic.

Literally speaking, Dr. Paul IS the 3rd coming of Thomas Jefferson, while Warren G Harding (after all, he was the only one powerful enough to beat FDR) was the 2nd coming. Dr. Paul will NOT be assassinated or else his supporters will rise up and reclaim liberty.
 
I saw the topic and came in to post "because that's Dr. Paul. What do I win."

But then I saw the post where you already worship Dr. Paul.

I should have known better than you would have a Paul-free thread.

BTW, the word "literally" means the opposite of your use.
 
Mr. Harding was the first of only three Presidents that were elected directly from the Senate to the Presidency. The first two died in the third year of their first term of office.

I pray everyday that the current person in the White House makes it to noon, 20 JAN 2013, where he will be turned into an ex-president.
 
Anarchist420 said:
After all, the dude reversed (for awhile) the damage done by Wilson and he opposed the precursor to the American Sovereignty-destroying UN and its New World Order.

In your opinion, is it accurate to say that Harding was the true Presidential Savior of the Republic (because, by rejecting the Treaty of Versailles and the UN, he fought for our sovereignty like no man who was President other than Thomas Jefferson)?

Thomas Jefferson was the creator, Hamilton/Washington (with his support for the Jay Treaty and the mercantilists), Lincoln (destroyed the Founding Principles), and Wilson (got the ball rolling, Harding reversed it, but then Wilson's disciple FDR resurrected the NWO) were the Destroyers, and Harding is the first Savior of the Republic.

Literally speaking, Dr. Paul IS the 3rd coming of Thomas Jefferson, while Warren G Harding (after all, he was the only one powerful enough to beat FDR) was the 2nd coming. Dr. Paul will NOT be assassinated or else his supporters will rise up and reclaim liberty.
Click to expand...

Do you stay up late at night trying to think of the dumbest possible threads to start?
 
From the OP:
"Literally speaking, Dr. Paul IS the 3rd coming of Thomas Jefferson, while Warren G Harding (after all, he was the only one powerful enough to beat FDR) was the 2nd coming. Dr. Paul will NOT be assassinated or else his supporters will rise up and reclaim liberty."

Are you talking armed revolt if some delusional maniac decides that alot of his problems would be solved if he shot Mr Paul? What is your definition of liberty?
 
Anarchist420 said:
After all, the dude reversed (for awhile) the damage done by Wilson and he opposed the precursor to the American Sovereignty-destroying UN and its New World Order.

In your opinion, is it accurate to say that Harding was the true Presidential Savior of the Republic (because, by rejecting the Treaty of Versailles and the UN, he fought for our sovereignty like no man who was President other than Thomas Jefferson)?

Thomas Jefferson was the creator, Hamilton/Washington (with his support for the Jay Treaty and the mercantilists), Lincoln (destroyed the Founding Principles), and Wilson (got the ball rolling, Harding reversed it, but then Wilson's disciple FDR resurrected the NWO) were the Destroyers, and Harding is the first Savior of the Republic.

Literally speaking, Dr. Paul IS the 3rd coming of Thomas Jefferson, while Warren G Harding (after all, he was the only one powerful enough to beat FDR) was the 2nd coming. Dr. Paul will NOT be assassinated or else his supporters will rise up and reclaim liberty.
Click to expand...

Trying to figure out how Harding had anything to do with the UN. (second bolded item)

My version of history has the UN after WWII

Harding was before FDR;

Also, where/why is the UN destroying American Sovereignty? (first bolded item)
 
The League of Nations was the predecessor to the UN and Harding rejected it.

The UN absolutely does destroy American sovereignty, because it requires us to take part in the world, whether we want to or not. It can push regulations on us that we don't want, the WTO mandates that patents be 20 years, it stops us from having our trade policy, the WHO can influence our leaders to mandate vaccines, etc., etc. The UN also makes us the worlds' policemen or pushes us into wars we don't want to be in--think the beginning of the invasion of the Gulf, the War in Libya, and the Korean War. Congress was opposed to the latter 2 of those, so the UN most definitely does destroy Congress's sovereignty.
 
Anarchist420 said:
The League of Nations was the predecessor to the UN and Harding rejected it.

The UN absolutely does destroy American sovereignty, because it requires us to take part in the world, whether we want to or not. It can push regulations on us that we don't want, the WTO mandates that patents be 20 years, it stops us from having our trade policy, the WHO can influence our leaders to mandate vaccines, etc., etc. The UN also makes us the worlds' policemen or pushes us into wars we don't want to be in--think the beginning of the invasion of the Gulf, the War in Libya, and the Korean War. Congress was opposed to the latter 2 of those, so the UN most definitely does destroy Congress's sovereignty.
Click to expand...

You are so stupid I don't even know where to begin.

The UN can't force us to do anything we don't want to do. We have absolute veto power in the security council, and general assembly resolutions aren't legally binding.

In the cases where we have gone to war with the UN, you have it precisely backwards. The US used the UN to garner support for our foreign policy, not the other way around. I have no idea how you don't know this. The Korean War had overwhelming Congressional support when it happened. No one with a brain in their head thinks we went to Korea and Libya because the UN told us to.

The WTO isn't even part of the UN.

In light of this gigantic pile of ignorance and stupidity you just dumped on us, have you at all considered maybe learning something about these topics before opening your mouth?
 
Anarchist420 said:
Literally speaking, Dr. Paul IS the 3rd coming of Thomas Jefferson
Click to expand...

Not unless you can prove reincarnation is a factual phenomenon.

It'd be easier to prove Herman Cain is a distant result of the 3rd coming of Thomas Jefferson :sneaky:

But you don't seem the type to be into genealogy.
 
Ron Paul would be butchered in the senate like Julius Caesar. I hope to vote for Paul, but not looking good...
 
Generator said:
Ron Paul would be butchered in the senate like Julius Caesar. I hope to vote for Paul, but not looking good...
Click to expand...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At least being butchered would require the Senate paying some attention to Ron Paul, but as a Member of the House of Representatives, the larger house simply ignores Ron Paul instead. As Ron Paul leads a political coalition of one.

As for Warren Harding, he is basically the grandfather of the great Depression by advocating the economic policies that led to it. But maybe Warren's father summed him up best as he said, " Warren, you are lucky you were not born female, because you don't know how to say No, and thus you would be in the family way all the time." Maybe the quote is not exact, but the meaning is the same.

But out of such clay, our OP wants to put together a great man of foresight. But as this forum shows, all our OP put together is a turd now shredded into tiny pieces.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top