Why isn't this documentary mentioned ANYWHERE in the US media?

[Zephyr106]

Originally posted by: PrinceofWands

Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Because it's probably blantant Anti American propaganda. I wouldn't be surprised if some terrorist sympathizers weren't involved in this project.

That wouldn't be necessary. There are more than enough non-terrorists in the world pissed off at America to do it...hell, half of them are Americans. But it's irrelevant. If they have the facts straight, then who produced it doesn't matter. What it's purpose is doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is if it's true.

NO! You're either with us or you're against us. Everyone who doesn't like our Godly President Bush is a terrorist.

Zephyr

 

[PrinceofWands]

Originally posted by: Zephyr106

Originally posted by: PrinceofWands

Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Because it's probably blantant Anti American propaganda. I wouldn't be surprised if some terrorist sympathizers weren't involved in this project.

That wouldn't be necessary. There are more than enough non-terrorists in the world pissed off at America to do it...hell, half of them are Americans. But it's irrelevant. If they have the facts straight, then who produced it doesn't matter. What it's purpose is doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is if it's true.

NO! You're either with us or you're against us. Everyone who doesn't like our Godly President Bush is a terrorist.

Zephyr

Is that your tongue in your cheek?

 

[blahblah99]

How many of you guys that are talking out of your ass have seen the video?

If you don't have access to it, let me summarize what I think is an important postulation that arose out of the video. In the end, the narrator interviews the guy who supposedly made a 90 second copy of a tape that blatantly shows acts of war crimes. In the interview, he said two guys hunted him down and beat him before stealing the copy, and that the two guys worked for Doshtum. Whether or not this is true doesn't really matter. What matters is that if Doshtum's forces were involved in the war crimes committed, he would have already been put under trial for war crimes. The question is why hasn't he? If US forces were involved, then US would certainly not want Doshtum to be put on trial since he would have evidence (maybe, if that is on the 90 second video) of US soldiers being involved also! And since America operates on the chain of command, that would mean the government would be in BIG TROUBLE.

 

[Tab]

Someone find me the video, in a non-real player format.

 

[PrinceofWands]

Originally posted by: Tabb
Someone find me the video, in a non-real player format.

Why not just download the real player and quicktime alternatives (uses media player classic as a base)? They work great.

 

[OutHouse]

It was reported. I remember some story about it when it happend.

 

[Shad0hawK]

i watched it. i just had to laugh at the more than obvious bias.

they seem to try to say the US is mostly guilty by association. saying "the american were in charge so theya re responsible"

when they ask the question "what about american involvement?" to goto the part where the CIA talked about john lindh, they showed the part of the CIA talking smack to him(whihc often happens in interrogations..DUH) and emphasize the fact he "threatened" him. and spent about 15 minutes on the prison revolt JWL was involved in.

they do thier best to disguise the fact that americans were not actually with the convoy when the prisoners were shot, did not actually kill any unarmed prisoners but were only at the start and destination, and told by americans to get rid of the bodies.

at the end there is one person claiming he had a tape and when asked diectly about american involvement he went on and on about how they were at the prison where the trucks were unloaded, and he makes on sentence and says "a few americans were there you can see them in the tape" but did not say the americans shot anyone...just that a "few" were there.