Why is Red Squirrel bumping all of Mayne's threads?

effowe

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2004
6,012
18
81
Granted he's a troll, but I don't see why all of his threads need to be on the first page.

/lockemall
 

02ranger

Golden Member
Mar 22, 2006
1,046
0
76
All of Red's bumps were between 2:27 and 2:32AM, so I guess he's bumping just Mayne's threads on purpose. No idea why, though.......
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,381
4,999
136
Maybe Red Squirrel and Mayne have something going on.... a little more than " Bumping ".
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
The thread asking "Should we kill anyone who bumps a Mayne thread?" existed first.

In that thread, I provided a link that lists all Mayne threads and I bumped one myself.

It seems Red Squirrel found my link and bumped a few threads.

This is my fault. I'm so sorry.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,411
33,087
136
Because he's not very bright??

This. I rank ATOT intelligence level thusly:

Rubycon > Mayne > everyone else > Red Squirrel > John Conner

Edit: spaceman might be greater than Mayne but the jury is still out.
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
life is like a box of chocolates


your fat friend comes over and eats all teh candy and you get pissed
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
This. I rank ATOT intelligence level thusly:

Rubycon > Mayne > everyone else > Red Squirrel > John Conner

Edit: spaceman might be greater than Mayne but the jury is still out.

Eh, Mayne is unquantifiable in a division by zero sense. In other words, not a good thing. I couldn't even refine your scale to make it meaningfully accurate with Mayne's name on there in terms of intelligence.

And you forgot two very important groupings as well, which would be "P&N Regulars" and "L&R Regulars", which your scale would need a very healthy revision just to accommodate those groups. I don't think computers can calculate decimals that small yet. :hmm: Perhaps that's why you simply left them off.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,411
33,087
136
Eh, Mayne is unquantifiable in a division by zero sense. In other words, not a good thing. I couldn't even refine your scale to make it meaningfully accurate with Mayne's name on there in terms of intelligence.

And you forgot two very important groupings as well, which would be "P&N Regulars" and "L&R Regulars", which your scale would need a very healthy revision just to accommodate those groups. I don't think computers can calculate decimals that small yet. :hmm: Perhaps that's why you simply left them off.
My ranking was for ATOT only. I don't spend a lot of time in L&R but I know enough to rank them:

Rubycon > Mayne/spaceman > most P&N liberals > everyone else including L&R > a few of the better P&N conservatives > Red Squirrel > most P&N conservatives > John Conner > a few more of the really bad P&N conservatives > schmuckley > michal1980
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
This. I rank ATOT intelligence level thusly:

Rubycon > Mayne > everyone else > Red Squirrel > John Conner

Edit: spaceman might be greater than Mayne but the jury is still out.
LOL You rank JohnConnor last? LOL

P.S. LOL
 

xeemzor

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2005
2,599
1
71
This. I rank ATOT intelligence level thusly:

Rubycon > Mayne > everyone else > Red Squirrel > John Conner

Edit: spaceman might be greater than Mayne but the jury is still out.

How is Dave McOwen not last on this list?
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
My theory is that Mayne is an elaborate alter ego of Perknose created just to mess with us. Would explain why he hasn't been banned yet. I think Red Squirrel is in on it. We're through the looking glass people.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
My ranking was for ATOT only. I don't spend a lot of time in L&R but I know enough to rank them:

Rubycon > Mayne/spaceman > most P&N liberals > everyone else including L&R > a few of the better P&N conservatives > Red Squirrel > most P&N conservatives > John Conner > a few more of the really bad P&N conservatives > schmuckley > michal1980

I admire your effort, mostly because it made me laugh. :biggrin:

Still way off though. Way, WAY off.