Why is it that we have to vote for the "lesser of two evils"?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

extra

Golden Member
Dec 18, 1999
1,947
7
81
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: Genx87
People only say this because they dont particularily like their own candidate. If you truely believe it then dont vote for either.

Not voting/voting for Ron Paul (or other canidate with no real chance at winning) doesn't get anything done either because one or the other is still getting elected. At least I can vote for who I think will do the least amount of damage to the country, which is why I will be voting. I have not figured out who for though.

I dislike the "fringe parties" just as much because they are generally for things that are against what current popular belief is (a lot of the time).

I dont really buy that argument either. If people took your advice and didnt vote for Ross Perot in 92, Clinton would only be known as a Presidential nominee. You will notice after that smackdown the republicans refocused and got their small govt shit together in 94.

If enough people didnt take your advice and voted in 3rd party candidates then the two big parties would have to listen or risk being replaced.

See that in bold? Yeah, thats why Obama needs to win.

That is my view as well. The best thing we can do is have Obama win, help get health care fixed, then in '10 the republicans regain control of congress and actually beccome for small government again and get this disastrous debt under control. It's what needs to happen.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
I dislike the "fringe parties" just as much because they are generally for things that are against what current popular belief is (a lot of the time).

If a million people believe a stupid thing, it is still a stupid thing. If current popular belief is your chief arbiter of right and wrong then that really ought to be a sign that something is wrong.

Kierkegaard said it quite succinctly: "The crowd is untruth."

ZV

No doubt, but I don't see a point to legalizing weed among other things that Ron Paul is for (his stance on the housing market for example is horrible, we cannot let it crumble even if they deserve it to).

Whether Ron Paul's particular stance may not be 100% right, your stance is 100% wrong on both issues.

If legalizing weed is wrong, please explain how it's current illegality is good for the US.

And how exactly do you propose to prevent the housing market from crumbling? It already has. You and your bumbling politicians have had your chance and fucked everything up. Let somebody else have a crack at it.

I now know why I never venture into this subforum to post. At any rate I did, so I'll explain my views on both topics.

First weed. I have no use for weed. While the majority of weed users just sit around baked in their house and do stupid shit at home while eating everything (and Darwin claims one every so often), it really has no use being legalized. I will say it is one of the least harmful drugs but that in no way means it should be legalized. With legalizing weed the only positive point out of it, would be it can then be taxed. The negatives of drugs in general far outweigh the possible tax benefit. I really don't care to dig up numbers but (right or wrong) I believe that weed being legal will cause crime rates to increase.

You want me to explain how it's illegality is GOOD, but I don't see any reason why it is BAD (with the exception of tax revenue). If you want it changed then put forward your case as to why it should be changed.

Do you not see how this applies to other items as well? Alcohol, cigarettes...but hey, we like to have a drink every now and then (or all of the time if one is an alcoholic) but those are still legalized. But we all know what happened when alcohol was prohibited....crime went nuts. So pleas explain to me how legalizing/decriminalizing weed would make crime rise in a significant manner when all logic points to it decreasing significantly.

Alcohol was legal at one point. Then one day it was not. THAT is the reason crime increased, because people wanted what they used to be able to legally obtain and would go through illegal means to get it. I didn't say alcohol/cigs were good, but on a global scale where are alcohol/tobacco legal? I don't know of any country that is not "3rd world" that has a ban on one/both. How about weed? Most modern countries do.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: extra
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: Genx87
People only say this because they dont particularily like their own candidate. If you truely believe it then dont vote for either.

Not voting/voting for Ron Paul (or other canidate with no real chance at winning) doesn't get anything done either because one or the other is still getting elected. At least I can vote for who I think will do the least amount of damage to the country, which is why I will be voting. I have not figured out who for though.

I dislike the "fringe parties" just as much because they are generally for things that are against what current popular belief is (a lot of the time).

I dont really buy that argument either. If people took your advice and didnt vote for Ross Perot in 92, Clinton would only be known as a Presidential nominee. You will notice after that smackdown the republicans refocused and got their small govt shit together in 94.

If enough people didnt take your advice and voted in 3rd party candidates then the two big parties would have to listen or risk being replaced.

See that in bold? Yeah, thats why Obama needs to win.

That is my view as well. The best thing we can do is have Obama win, help get health care fixed, then in '10 the republicans regain control of congress and actually beccome for small government again and get this disastrous debt under control. It's what needs to happen.

Obama-messiah-jesus-savior to the rescue huh?

jk jk ;) (I had to, but I was kidding and would really like this to not erode into a Obama vs McCain vs Ron Paul thread, we have plenty of those.)
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,006
55,442
136
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus

Alcohol was legal at one point. Then one day it was not. THAT is the reason crime increased, because people wanted what they used to be able to legally obtain and would go through illegal means to get it. I didn't say alcohol/cigs were good, but on a global scale where are alcohol/tobacco legal? I don't know of any country that is not "3rd world" that has a ban on one/both. How about weed? Most modern countries do.

So what's the difference? Weed was legal at one point too. If you are attempting to say that legalizing marijuana would increase crime you're going to need to provide some evidence for that. Prohibition of popular substances creates black markets, and black markets create crime.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Tell them to vote third party, and they?ll tell you to stop wasting your vote.

It?s a simple matter of blackmail. Of entrapment. If you fail to support side A, then side B will win. Side B is the devil incarnate so unless you want the end of the world you have to vote for side A, forever.

It is astonishing how effective a two sided coin is. If people think you?re doing a poor job you just point to the other side. Yet as long as both sides favor government expansion then they have no real difference between them. The people get screwed either way. Yet the people can?t understand this. What we have here is an ancient strategy of taking the people and dividing them to fight amongst themselves.

How do you overcome divide and conquer? By realigning the sides and uniting under a new banner. Not as Republican or Democrat, but as the people against the party elite. All the R and D talk of ?change? and ?for the people? is to get ahead of this movement and step between you and the desire for change. Why does it work? All they do is point to the other side of government as the problem, and to themselves as salvation.

Yet the true problem isn?t the party elite. They would be powerless if the American people held American values. We sacrifice freedom for security. We sacrifice individual power in favor of government power. We hold our own Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, and our Bill of Rights in contempt. We would have never allowed the current state of affairs if we believed in our own founding.

Yet what do we hear? That these are living documents meant to change with the times. That they are too old to be relevant. Yes, the Bill of Rights is ?too old? to be ?relevant?. The problem with America, is that we have not raised Americans. Too few people believe in our tenants now.

QFT

Couldn't have said it better myself.

We could have better government if people weren't stupid. Duh?

Yep, if idiots like you didn't vote for the two party system we would be tons better off.

All you ideological idiots think the same. You all diagnose the problem and have no answers that mean a thing. Always there's this if only this or if only that and there's no chance at all your if will be in any timely manner.

Actually the problem is people like you moonbeam. You 'think' or 'believe' that 'your guy' is going to change washington, that he won't do business as usual. Well, there have been many of those empty word speakers through the last 100yrs of presidents and guess what? None of them did shit but increase the size of government. Your messiah will do no different. He will implement more government oversight, universal healthcare, continue an aggressive foreign policy and accrue more debt for the American people. You really can't help it though, you're blind.

And to hear Jackass talk about others not believing in the Founding Fathers and knowing his cowardly reaction to Islam just makes me laugh.

What does islam have to do with anything? Your messiah had plenty of opportunities to stand up for the constitution yet he rolled over like a yellow pig that he is.

There is only Obama this time who has any possibility of bringing meaningful change. The fools will vote third party and Republican.

There is only Obama FOR YOU. Cause fools like you continue to participate in the two party system. Those are the true fools Moonbeam, continuing the same patterns expecting a different result. Wait, or is it insanity? :laugh:
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What eskimospy said, but your thinking is very flawed. You call Obama a change from Bush. When you are headed off a cliff a change in course is mandatory. You're thinking is that it is better to drive off the cliff than maybe change direction and run into a wall. You are in fantasy land in your head.

There's no "maybe run into a wall" with Obama. It's still driving off a cliff. Lots of people shout about "change", and they're right, with Obama we will drive off a different cliff. The net result is identical, of course, but hey at least it's a "change", right?

Forgive me if I'm not enthusiastic.

The lesser of two evils is still evil and it is only an utterly defeated person without any hope remaining who would choose a lesser evil over even the tiniest chance of good.

ZV

What are you talking about. There isn't any tiniest chance at all. A Democrat or a Republican will win. Get fucking real. Nobody but a fool wouldn't pick the lesser of two evils when one or the other will be elected. You can't adjust your mind to reality, it seems. You keep pretending there's some other answer when there is none. It isn't a defeated person who will vote the lesser of two evils, it's you who are defeated by reality. You can't face facts as they are.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What are you talking about. There isn't any tiniest chance at all. A Democrat or a Republican will win. Get fucking real. Nobody but a fool wouldn't pick the lesser of two evils when one or the other will be elected. You can't adjust your mind to reality, it seems. You keep pretending there's some other answer when there is none. It isn't a defeated person who will vote the lesser of two evils, it's you who are defeated by reality. You can't face facts as they are.

Talk about being defeated. You vote for the lesser of two evils. When you stoop to that level, you've given up.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
I think people who talk about voting for "the lesser of two evils" are the least politically aware, and usually stay home on election day anyway.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
People who vote for the lesser of two evils are nothing but victims of their own crime.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
M: We could have better government if people weren't stupid. Duh?

PC: Yep, if idiots like you didn't vote for the two party system we would be tons better off.

The 'IF' of a dreamer who can't face what is. You are the idiot because you life in 'IF LAND'.

M: All you ideological idiots think the same. You all diagnose the problem and have no answers that mean a thing. Always there's this if only this or if only that and there's no chance at all your if will be in any timely manner.

PC: Actually the problem is people like you moonbeam. You 'think' or 'believe' that 'your guy' is going to change washington, won't do business as usual.

M: How many fucking times do I have to say it. Only Obama will have any opportunity to change anything. He will have a Democratic congress and a rare opportunity to do things. God only knows if he will. McSame will be stymied at every turn. Knock of the "Moonbeam's a believer shit" I don't believe anything but that the opportunity will be there if Obama wins.

PC: Well, there have been many of those empty word speakers through the last 100yrs of presidents and guess what? None of them did shit but increase the size of government. You messiah will do no different. He will implement more government oversight, universal healthcare, continue an aggressive foreign policy and accrue more debt for the American people. You really can't help it though, you're blind.

M: No you are blind because you know all this shit and it's just your shit opinion. I don't know what Obama will do. I do know only he will have a chance to do anything. You're just a piss ant nobody neigh sayer to me.

M: And to hear Jackass talk about others not believing in the Founding Fathers and knowing his cowardly reaction to Islam just makes me laugh.

PC: What does islam have to do with anything? Your messiah had plenty of opportunities to stand up for the constitution yet he rolled over like a yellow pig that he is.

M: Hehe, It has to do with nothing you would understand and nothing pertinent here. Obama does not yet have opportunity. Nothing happens until the time is right and that time hasn't arrived.

M: There is only Obama this time who has any possibility of bringing meaningful change. The fools will vote third party and Republican.

PC: There is only Obama FOR YOU. Cause fools like you continue to participate in the two party system.

M: Exactly so only Obama for me and everybody else cause the only other who can win is McSame. See, you just can't deal with fact.

PD: Those are the true fools Moonbeam, continuing the same patterns expecting a different result. Wait, or is it insanity?

M: No, I see everything you do. But most people don't and never will. I am voting for the best hope we have, not for a dream that will not be. You are still the bigger fool because you can't face what is actually going to be. The fools who continue to vote for one or the other don't give a shit what you think.

You are a lunatic radical fringe out in the woods lunatic ideologue and you will waste your vote like a fool, helping the greater evil win. Stupid ass.

Now what do say? Will Obama or McCain win this election? Now if one of those two is actually going to win, because this isn't dream land, which one should you help get in office? I know I know, you can't wrap your mind around something real. You've got to retreat into more bull shit.


 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
I dislike the "fringe parties" just as much because they are generally for things that are against what current popular belief is (a lot of the time).

If a million people believe a stupid thing, it is still a stupid thing. If current popular belief is your chief arbiter of right and wrong then that really ought to be a sign that something is wrong.

Kierkegaard said it quite succinctly: "The crowd is untruth."

ZV

What election did he win?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Craig234
Democrats want to actually help the poor, not to have bad programs that do harm.
At the individual level, I have no doubt that you're correct. At the individual level I have no doubt that most Republicans want to help people as well.

Once you get beyond that, corruption sets in. Democrats and Republicans in Washington have no interest in helping anybody but themselves. That's why federal programs to "help people" will fail. They're instituted to put people in power. If the poor are actually helped, that's just dumb luck.

I don't buy this. I think democrats fail to understand that poor people hate themselves and their poverty is self inflicted. You can't help people except as you hide that fact from them. For example if you find a ten dollar bill in the morning your attitude will be better all day, and attitude is everything.

I think most people want to help, democrats and republicans, as you say, but they are not wise enough to do so.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Svnla
As an independent, I wish we have a "America First" party.

A party with common senses and LONG TERM solutions...ie..how to fix SS/Medicare/economy/etc. without the band-aid quick fixes/scare tactics/half truths from BOTH sides as they stand right now.

Too much lobbyist/greed/$$/self serving in polictics <on both sides>.

If only, if only says the dreamer.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What are you talking about. There isn't any tiniest chance at all. A Democrat or a Republican will win. Get fucking real. Nobody but a fool wouldn't pick the lesser of two evils when one or the other will be elected. You can't adjust your mind to reality, it seems. You keep pretending there's some other answer when there is none. It isn't a defeated person who will vote the lesser of two evils, it's you who are defeated by reality. You can't face facts as they are.

Talk about being defeated. You vote for the lesser of two evils. When you stoop to that level, you've given up.

You are the one who has given up. I can stoop to any level I have to to do the right thing. I'm not a dreamer moral purist like you. I am a pragmatic machine who will commit any evil required to save your worthless ass.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Meh, in all this "lesser of two evils" and third party stuff it occurs to me that I haven't seen a third party candidate this year that I'd like to vote for either. They'd all be a compromise (lessor of 2 evils) in one way or another.

Maybe the problem is deeper than just the 2 party system.

I'd rather we vote on the issues (which ones are important and what we want to do about them), then having resolved that, pick the person we want to carry out our voted upon decisions.

Fern
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
I think people who talk about voting for "the lesser of two evils" are the least politically aware, and usually stay home on election day anyway.

Exactly, that is why I vote for the greater of the two goods.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: brxndxn
I have a political science degree..
[...]
Right now, both parties are extremely centrist with very little difference between the two..

So do I.

Surely you can see that this current iteration of the Republican party, which lies prostrate and pandering before the radical religious right and their various litmus tests, which has developed and promoted the RADICAL idea of the Unitary Presidency (which nearly completely obliterates our nearly 200 year old heritage of checks and balances between the three branches of government), and which has broken down our historic Constitutional divide between church and state, even going so far as to promote faith based "science", and which has enthusiastically overseen the creation and promotion of the largest and most repressive government internal security bureaucracy the free world has ever seen, the Dept. of Homeland Security, is anything but centrist.

In fact, this Republican party is the most RADICALLY right wing and retrograde major political party now extant in ALL of the globe's major Western democracies, BY FAR.

It is radical, authoritarian, religious, and the vigilant nursemaid of the ultra rich.

At the moment I can't think of having ever read a better post. This is just splendid in so many ways.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
M: We could have better government if people weren't stupid. Duh?

PC: Yep, if idiots like you didn't vote for the two party system we would be tons better off.

The 'IF' of a dreamer who can't face what is. You are the idiot because you life in 'IF LAND'.

Its only "if" because you're too lazy to work for something real. You want the easy win. You'll get it too, and all the debt/corrupt foreign policy with it. You will own it while I'll have moral authority to denounce it.

M: All you ideological idiots think the same. You all diagnose the problem and have no answers that mean a thing. Always there's this if only this or if only that and there's no chance at all your if will be in any timely manner.

PC: Actually the problem is people like you moonbeam. You 'think' or 'believe' that 'your guy' is going to change washington, won't do business as usual.

M: How many fucking times do I have to say it. Only Obama will have any opportunity to change anything. He will have a Democratic congress and a rare opportunity to do things. God only knows if he will. McSame will be stymied at every turn. Knock of the "Moonbeam's a believer shit" I don't believe anything but that the opportunity will be there if Obama wins.

Don't give me that bullshit moonbeam. Bush had control of congress too, what did that get us? Your logic is flawed. Just because your messiah is a good speaker doesn't mean he will be a good president. His emty words have filled your brain with lolly pop dreams and candycane coated lies. Sweet to the taste but bitter in the stomach.

PC: Well, there have been many of those empty word speakers through the last 100yrs of presidents and guess what? None of them did shit but increase the size of government. You messiah will do no different. He will implement more government oversight, universal healthcare, continue an aggressive foreign policy and accrue more debt for the American people. You really can't help it though, you're blind.

M: No you are blind because you know all this shit and it's just your shit opinion. I don't know what Obama will do. I do know only he will have a chance to do anything. You're just a piss ant nobody neigh sayer to me.

The feelings mutual moonbeam. Maybe after you see his false plans and empty words come to fruition you too will finally see the truth. But you are too busy dancing to the merry go round song.

M: And to hear Jackass talk about others not believing in the Founding Fathers and knowing his cowardly reaction to Islam just makes me laugh.

PC: What does islam have to do with anything? Your messiah had plenty of opportunities to stand up for the constitution yet he rolled over like a yellow pig that he is.

M: Hehe, It has to do with nothing you would understand and nothing pertinent here. Obama does not yet have opportunity. Nothing happens until the time is right and that time hasn't arrived.

I await your disappointment.

M: There is only Obama this time who has any possibility of bringing meaningful change. The fools will vote third party and Republican.

PC: There is only Obama FOR YOU. Cause fools like you continue to participate in the two party system.

M: Exactly so only Obama for me and everybody else cause the only other who can win is McSame. See, you just can't deal with fact.

Oh I have dealt with it. Its you ignorant fools who will have to deal with your conscience over the next 4 years.

PD: Those are the true fools Moonbeam, continuing the same patterns expecting a different result. Wait, or is it insanity?

M: No, I see everything you do. But most people don't and never will. I am voting for the best hope we have, not for a dream that will not be. You are still the bigger fool because you can't face what is actually going to be. The fools who continue to vote for one or the other don't give a shit what you think.

The reason its a dream in your eyes is because people like you don't go with their heart, instead you and people like you hang your sign on the same lynching tree.

You are a lunatic radical fringe out in the woods lunatic ideologue and you will waste your vote like a fool, helping the greater evil win. Stupid ass.

I wonder how you will feel about your vote once more deaths, more debt and more government intrusion comes about because of it? Who then, moonbeam, will be the stupid ass?

Now what do say? Will Obama or McCain win this election? Now if one of those two is actually going to win, because this isn't dream land, which one should you help get in office? I know I know, you can't wrap your mind around something real. You've got to retreat into more bull shit.

No, I can't wrap my mind around more government when I know we have enough. I cn't wrap my mind around more debt, when I know we don't have to. I can't wrap my mind around more government control, when I know its only stealing liberty. I can't wrap my mind around any of the bullshit the two party system represents. Your candidates may have a chance, but having a chance at winning or a clear conscience, I'll take the latter. I know I know, its too much effort to live a moral life....


[/quote]

 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What are you talking about. There isn't any tiniest chance at all. A Democrat or a Republican will win. Get fucking real. Nobody but a fool wouldn't pick the lesser of two evils when one or the other will be elected. You can't adjust your mind to reality, it seems. You keep pretending there's some other answer when there is none. It isn't a defeated person who will vote the lesser of two evils, it's you who are defeated by reality. You can't face facts as they are.

Talk about being defeated. You vote for the lesser of two evils. When you stoop to that level, you've given up.

You are the one who has given up. I can stoop to any level I have to to do the right thing. I'm not a dreamer moral purist like you. I am a pragmatic machine who will commit any evil required to save your worthless ass.

Save your evil shit. I don't want it. Fucking fools who look to evil for good.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Fern
Meh, in all this "lesser of two evils" and third party stuff it occurs to me that I haven't seen a third party candidate this year that I'd like to vote for either. They'd all be a compromise (lessor of 2 evils) in one way or another.

Maybe the problem is deeper than just the 2 party system.

I'd rather we vote on the issues (which ones are important and what we want to do about them), then having resolved that, pick the person we want to carry out our voted upon decisions.

Fern

Somewhere over the rainbow
Way up high,
There's a candidate that I heard of
Once in a lullaby.
Somewhere over the rainbow
Skies are blue,
And the dreams that you dare to dream
Really do come true.

 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,006
55,442
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What are you talking about. There isn't any tiniest chance at all. A Democrat or a Republican will win. Get fucking real. Nobody but a fool wouldn't pick the lesser of two evils when one or the other will be elected. You can't adjust your mind to reality, it seems. You keep pretending there's some other answer when there is none. It isn't a defeated person who will vote the lesser of two evils, it's you who are defeated by reality. You can't face facts as they are.

Talk about being defeated. You vote for the lesser of two evils. When you stoop to that level, you've given up.

You are the one who has given up. I can stoop to any level I have to to do the right thing. I'm not a dreamer moral purist like you. I am a pragmatic machine who will commit any evil required to save your worthless ass.

Save your evil shit. I don't want it. Fucking fools who look to evil for good.

I'm sorry to tell you man, but the two party system is here to stay. Forever. The reason is due to the fundamental collective action problem present in any winner take all system. Moonbeam is 100% right. It might suck, but it's reality.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
PC: Its only "if" because you're too lazy to work for something real. You want the easy win. You'll get it too, and all the debt/corrupt foreign policy with it. You will own it while I'll have moral authority to denounce it.

Oh bully for you. As I said, I don't get off on your childish notion of morality. I hope it's not that evil McSame you help elect.

PC: Don't give me that bullshit moonbeam. Bush had control of congress too, what did that get us? Your logic is flawed. Just because your messiah is a good speaker doesn't mean he will be a good president. His emty words have filled your brain with lolly pop dreams and candycane coated lies. Sweet to the taste but bitter in the stomach.

M: Sorry buy you continue to be an ass. Bush gave us what Bush is, a disaster. Obama will have a chance to be something different if he wins. You are just a fool who thinks he knows what that will be win knowbody does or can.

PC: The feelings mutual moonbeam. Maybe after you see his false plans and empty words come to fruition you too will finally see the truth. But you are too busy dancing to the merry go round song.

M: When I see it I will know Obama failed to take advantage of a rare and precious opportunity, one your fantasy candidate will never have.

PC: I await your disappointment.

M: You live a constant state of disappointment because nobody gives a shit about your brilliant third party knowledge and opinion. If Obama fails he fails and with idiots like you he doesn't have much of a chance. I will do what I can to help him win and it's all over for me. I will have done my moral duty. Save me a space in the corner where we can both sit in the corner and suck our thumbs, and maybe have a tantrum. Hehe. I have no ideology, yeah, I'm free!

PC: Oh I have dealt with it. Its you ignorant fools who will have to deal with your conscience over the next 4 years.

M: Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord. I condemn you to suffer your stupidity. Hi God? Nice ta meet cha, dude.

PC: The reason its a dream in your eyes is because people like you don't go with their heart, instead you and people like you hang your sign on the same lynching tree.

M: Yes, quite so. Most will vote their favorite fear.

PC: I wonder how you will feel about your vote once more deaths, more debt and more government intrusion comes about because of it? Who then, moonbeam, will be the stupid ass?

M: I will vote for the greater of the two goods that have a chance to win and you will waste your vote. I will know I did better than you did.

PC" No, I can't wrap my mind around more government when I know we have enough. I cn't wrap my mind around more debt, when I know we don't have to. I can't wrap my mind around more government control, when I know its only stealing liberty. I can't wrap my mind around any of the bullshit the two party system represents. Your candidates may have a chance, but having a chance at winning or a clear conscience, I'll take the latter. I know I know, its too much effort to live a moral life....

M: I know. You would rather commit evil than admit it because you're stuffed full of ideological ego.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What are you talking about. There isn't any tiniest chance at all. A Democrat or a Republican will win. Get fucking real. Nobody but a fool wouldn't pick the lesser of two evils when one or the other will be elected. You can't adjust your mind to reality, it seems. You keep pretending there's some other answer when there is none. It isn't a defeated person who will vote the lesser of two evils, it's you who are defeated by reality. You can't face facts as they are.

Talk about being defeated. You vote for the lesser of two evils. When you stoop to that level, you've given up.

You are the one who has given up. I can stoop to any level I have to to do the right thing. I'm not a dreamer moral purist like you. I am a pragmatic machine who will commit any evil required to save your worthless ass.

Save your evil shit. I don't want it. Fucking fools who look to evil for good.

I'm sorry to tell you man, but the two party system is here to stay. Forever. The reason is due to the fundamental collective action problem present in any winner take all system. Moonbeam is 100% right. It might suck, but it's reality.

I have hope that the people will awaken and change this worthless system but I won't waste my vote at a critical time like this when the prospects of that happening are nil. I have hope that isn't bitter. I don't need for what I hope to be.

If people like PC want to change the system they have to get off their asses and work to change it instead of sitting around on their computers bitching. I waste my vote on third party candidates all the time to send a message. So far everybody's been deaf. Hehe.

I do what I can here trying to show people how their self hate traps them as fools. Folks here are deaf too. People are totally hopeless but it makes me laugh. I defeated hopelessness a long time ago. I escaped from a place of no exit. :)
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: Fern
Meh, in all this "lesser of two evils" and third party stuff it occurs to me that I haven't seen a third party candidate this year that I'd like to vote for either. They'd all be a compromise (lessor of 2 evils) in one way or another.

Maybe the problem is deeper than just the 2 party system.

I'd rather we vote on the issues (which ones are important and what we want to do about them), then having resolved that, pick the person we want to carry out our voted upon decisions.

Fern

Unfortunately you're right. I have no idea what the Libertarians are thinking. I'd sooner vote for Obama than Barr.

Guess I'll just write in RP.