Axon
Platinum Member
- Sep 25, 2003
- 2,541
- 1
- 76
Even after reading this, I'd still fall back on my Watson theory.
Wrong. See my link above. Even people frugal in their personal life can and often will vote for expensive government programs.
No...I'm pretty sure the American lifestyle has a lot to do with it.
Care to explain why major European countries are facing bankruptcy as well? When you can walk into a voting booth and vote yourself whatever you want (e.g. low taxes AND expensive services), it doesn't matter what *YOUR* lifestyle is.
The state of Wisconsin HAD a rainy day fund, their former Republican Governor (twelve years? in office)never put money in it? a required $65 million a year in case of a recession! Have I got that right?
Except you are not telling the truth.
The Wisconson Republican attack has nothing to do with spending.
It's all about trying to get more corrupt power for themselves by attacking the funding for Democrats, so they can transfer even more wealth from everyone else to the rich.
The Union has agreed to make all the cuts the governor wants - he said no.
I'm surprised he didn't just make his demands to cut crazy so they'd have to say no and he could like that it's the money.
So you are against giving workers a CHOICE when it comes to spending their hard-earned money?
Why are you not outraged that unions give so much money to the Democrats?
Do you think it would be okay for a private corporation to directly charge every employee a "political" fee, and then give that money directly to the Republicans?
At least the private company employees could quit and find a company without such a fee. WI Union government workers don't have that choice.
Why are you against choice?
Care to explain why major European countries are facing bankruptcy as well? When you can walk into a voting booth and vote yourself whatever you want (e.g. low taxes AND expensive services), it doesn't matter what *YOUR* lifestyle is. You can have whatever personal lifestyle you want and walk around being one massive political contradiction. Democracy guarantees that those who cater to the irrational will win elections over those who do not. How can you compete with someone who promises low taxes and expensive services? You can't, unless you are offering the same. Democracy allows and rewards massive psychological contradictions through elections and politicians.
Union and Corporate funding in Politics should be Outlawed. Let Individuals drive Politics.
Stop your whining. No one is forcing anyone to vote for these yoyos taking money from corporations and special interest groups. The American sold their government to the highest bidder long ago and then took out a loan when the money ran out. It's a tradition that dates back to the original Athenian democracy where every vote was up for sale. It's unamerican to suggest something can't be bought and sold!
what does bankruptcy mean to you? You do realize it's only money right? Paper, or digits representing value. The value is still there even if currency is debased or started anew.
