Why is it called "Organic?"

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Descartes
I think everyone sees what you're arguing, but I personally think it's silly. Where exactly are you going where consumers are "falling all over that marketing to feel smugly good about themselves?" Seriously, I have many friends that shop at one of the more popular Whole Foods in ATL, including myself, and I've never encountered any of this. Yes, many people there are affluent, but never have I encountered one instance of snobbery. In fact, everyone there are some of the kindest and most helpful people I've known. All the workers are helpful and kind as well.

I'd just like to know more about where exactly you're having these experiences.
How much extra are they paying for organic produce as opposed to non-organic and why are they paying that premium?
I'm sure you, from a position of affluence, don't see this as snobbery, but to those who struggle to get by, it definitely is.
What is it about denial that destroys all sense of perspective?

Do I sound like an ass? Then think about what you're saying. You pay $3 bucks a pound for tomatoes just because you can and you think everyone else should be forced to do the same because it's "sustainable" and you don't think that's snobbery?
 

mattpegher

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2006
2,203
0
71
Although I am not overly concerned about buying organic vegitable or other foods, my wife and I have switched the kids to organic milk because we started to see acne on my daughter at age 8. We also have a local dairy which although not certified as organic promises no antibiotics and no hormones in their products.

Personnally I believe the high incidence of resistant bacteria to modern antibiotics is due to the use of antibiotics to increase yeald in livestock. A modern dairy cow will consume more cipro in one year than the average human would be prescribed in a lifetime.
 

SLCentral

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2003
3,542
0
71
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: SLCentral
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
LOL, why does SLCentral have to act like a rebellious zit faced 17 year old teenager mad at his dad?

I mean, if he doesn't like the term organic, or want to discuss the term, that's fine, but why does he have to be so angry in his posts? It just makes me laugh and it's just sad that he acts that way. And be careful if you want to disagree with him, he'll just come firing back at you w/ some F-bombs.

The reason I made this thread was because I questioned the name "organic." Not to discuss whether it's a good thing or not. I don't recall dropping any "f-bombs" other then in the OP, and I'm not angry at all. I'm just questioning "evidence" that was presented to me.

uhhh......
Originally posted by: SLCentral
Originally posted by: Rufus12
I have never seen something that is organic be 2x the price of a comparable item that is not organic. You obviously have never been out to the country where organic food is cheap, and good.

:confused:...so I should drive out to the country, which could be hours of driving, to get organic food?

Originally posted by: dartworth
::sigh::

Fvck off. You've not ONCE posted one comment that actually contributed to the discussion in any of my threads.

And you came to question the name "organic"...doesn't questioning lead to discussion? The point is, why do you have to act so tough on this matter? You're like so fired up on such a stupid topic. Get over it, get over yourself. You sound stupid.

The reason I said fvck off to dartworth has nothing to do with organic foods...it has to do with him being an ass consistently. Completely irrelevant to the topic.

Either way, sorry for trying to look "tough" if you thought that is what I was doing. This topic has turned into something I didn't want it to turn into, so whatever, I'm done :).
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: mattpegher
Although I am not overly concerned about buying organic vegitable or other foods, my wife and I have switched the kids to organic milk because we started to see acne on my daughter at age 8. We also have a local dairy which although not certified as organic promises no antibiotics and no hormones in their products.

Personnally I believe the high incidence of resistant bacteria to modern antibiotics is due to the use of antibiotics to increase yeald in livestock. A modern dairy cow will consume more cipro in one year than the average human would be prescribed in a lifetime.
The best bet there is to not drink milk at all. Cow's milk is for baby cows, not humans. Cultured milk products, like cheese, yogurt, etc., are acceptable, but most of the world's population are allergic to uncultured dairy products and should avoid them.
 

Descartes

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
13,968
2
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Descartes
I think everyone sees what you're arguing, but I personally think it's silly. Where exactly are you going where consumers are "falling all over that marketing to feel smugly good about themselves?" Seriously, I have many friends that shop at one of the more popular Whole Foods in ATL, including myself, and I've never encountered any of this. Yes, many people there are affluent, but never have I encountered one instance of snobbery. In fact, everyone there are some of the kindest and most helpful people I've known. All the workers are helpful and kind as well.

I'd just like to know more about where exactly you're having these experiences.
How much extra are they paying for organic produce as opposed to non-organic and why are they paying that premium?

I actually gave this a lot of thought. I think I'm better understanding your position, and thinking of it from that angle I can see why you'd say what you do. I also think this is the case with anything.

I'm going to come up with a silly analogy, but hopefully it makes sense and I think it demonstrates the same point. Forgive me in advance.

Some people attempt to align themselves with recognizable brands in order to enhance their self-perception or others' perception of them. Fair? Some people buy a Rolex because it's a Rolex, some people buy BMWs because it's a BMW; however, some people buy a Rolex because it's a reasonably good mechanical watch of interest that carries with it a certain artisinal history and quality and will last a lifetime; similarly, some people buy BMWs not because it's a BMW but because there aren't many cars that in that price range with superior handling characteristics.

Contrived, I know. Is that not more to your point though? Some people align themselves with boutique stores, organics, etc. because they feel it heightens their self-worth. I can't disagree with that. In fact, I know people like that. This is the necessary consequence of having a good product; you're always going to have superficial people that align themselves with your product for their own purpose. It's like people that buy Crystal or Dom because it's Crystal or Dom but can't tell the difference between either. They're still exceptional products, and there are people that appreciate them independent of their snob qualities.

I'm sure you, from a position of affluence, don't see this as snobbery, but to those who struggle to get by, it definitely is.
What is it about denial that destroys all sense of perspective?

I'm personally not in denial because I buy what I buy for personal reasons. I could give you the long history, but I'm guessing it's not that interesting. Suffice it to say that I moved to organics after a search for quality, not because I wanted to hang around the cool kids.

Do I sound like an ass?

Nope, not at all; in fact, most of your comments are very civil and free of insult. This isn't the norm on ATOT, and I'm sometimes guilty of a random "morons" comment here and there, but I try to stay away from calling any one person a moron.

Then think about what you're saying. You pay $3 bucks a pound for tomatoes just because you can and you think everyone else should be forced to do the same because it's "sustainable" and you don't think that's snobbery?

I've honestly never thought about it that way. I recommend the $3 tomatoes because they are exceptional, and I absolutely love tomatoes. I don't recommend it to feel special, and I certainly hope people wouldn't think me a snob for doing so. I care about quality, and I support people that put forth the extra effort to make a product that is better than average.

Anyway, sorry for the long post. I'm beginning to see your angle though... I think.
 

mattpegher

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2006
2,203
0
71
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: mattpegher
Although I am not overly concerned about buying organic vegitable or other foods, my wife and I have switched the kids to organic milk because we started to see acne on my daughter at age 8. We also have a local dairy which although not certified as organic promises no antibiotics and no hormones in their products.

Personnally I believe the high incidence of resistant bacteria to modern antibiotics is due to the use of antibiotics to increase yeald in livestock. A modern dairy cow will consume more cipro in one year than the average human would be prescribed in a lifetime.
The best bet there is to not drink milk at all. Cow's milk is for baby cows, not humans. Cultured milk products, like cheese, yogurt, etc., are acceptable, but most of the world's population are allergic to uncultured dairy products and should avoid them.

The studies on health benifits or risks for growing children drinking milk are in noway conclusive. Currently the American College of Pediatrics is following a trend away from milk. I still believe that children who are physically active benifit from the protein, fat and colesterol in milk. Yes I said cholesterol. Cholesterol is a building block for hormone production especially sex hormones.

Being of european decent my children have no problem with lactose tolerance.

Like everything though moderation of diet and plenty of exercise.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
ancient people in cities learned the value of organic when they started dying of cholera and stuff since they just tossed their fertilizer on the streets. sweet!
 

NaOH

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2006
5,015
0
0
Why are you so pissed off about organic crap. If you don't like it, then just don't buy it. You act like it's affecting your life that other people prefer organic..... It's called organic because it wasn't made using pesticides, unnatural fertilizer...etc. Also, because it hasn't been genetically altered in anyway.


I have learned from my gf, who is a bio major in berkeley that organic products do have negative affects on your body. Since they contain natural chemicals that hurt the creature eating it. I think they were carcinogens but i'm not sure.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: ElFenix

and again, in case you missed the point, subsistence farming, which is largely organic, is affordable by most of the world.

Hehe. Come on, though. By that standard, death is also afforable. They could also go to sweatshop factories and earn wages that while a pittance by our standards allow them to live better lives than subsistence farming does. Now, I'm not advocating sweatshops, but what I am saying is that while anyone could "afford" subsistence farming, there is a reason nobody, given a choice, pays that price.

As to your last comment directed at me: I agree, in principle. People are free to buy organic food, and many do, but the great majority of the population is not willing to pay that premium. In the non organic field (pardon the pun), things like vegetables are nearly perfectly competitive -- commodities in the purest sense. As such, for organic food to become 'mainstream' it has to price compete with agribusiness. You argue that it will, and I have no objection if it does. I'm sure we can both agree that given time, the market will almost certainly choose the food product that feeds the most people the least expensively -- and whatever system allows people the highest standard of living, in this case, is the preferable one.
 

mattpegher

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2006
2,203
0
71
The price issues are due to yeild plain and simple. Large corporate farms use comercial pesticides and fertilizers to increase their yeild and thus their profits. Small farms that choose to be organic do not get the large yeilds so thier price per unit is more.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: mattpegher
The price issues are due to yeild plain and simple. Large corporate farms use comercial pesticides and fertilizers to increase their yeild and thus their profits. Small farms that choose to be organic do not get the large yeilds so thier price per unit is more.

The price is high because people will pay it plain and simple.
 

mattpegher

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2006
2,203
0
71
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: mattpegher
The price issues are due to yeild plain and simple. Large corporate farms use comercial pesticides and fertilizers to increase their yeild and thus their profits. Small farms that choose to be organic do not get the large yeilds so thier price per unit is more.

The price is high because people will pay it plain and simple.

True but I don't think that Organic farms are making the profits that big corporate farms are making.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: mattpegher
Although I am not overly concerned about buying organic vegitable or other foods, my wife and I have switched the kids to organic milk because we started to see acne on my daughter at age 8. We also have a local dairy which although not certified as organic promises no antibiotics and no hormones in their products.

Personnally I believe the high incidence of resistant bacteria to modern antibiotics is due to the use of antibiotics to increase yeald in livestock. A modern dairy cow will consume more cipro in one year than the average human would be prescribed in a lifetime.

Puberty is starting earlier and earlier, which I think is in part due to us having more calories available to us than most previous generations. The body thinks, "Damn, there's plenty of food here. Reproduce ASAP to take advantage of this!" And so, puberty begins sooner.
Acne is of course a side effect, and is personal in its effects. Some people get hit hard, some hardly get anything. Some people only have it a little while, while in my family, my mom had it until sometime around when she turned 40. She really cut down on her milk consumption because of lactose intolerance. I'm 24 now, and my acne's only waned slightly.
 

Legend

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2005
2,254
1
0
Girls are having puberty earlier, in part, because of the estrogenic properties of soy, which is whole-heartedly endorsed by the beackon of all things healthy --- the FDA.
 

saahmed

Golden Member
Oct 5, 2005
1,388
1
0
So dumbasses can spend more money and help our economy while killing themselves faster so they dont eat up our social security. lol.

Its proven that organic vegetables and fruits are more harmful than normal because they are not protected, theyre also bad for our environment because they use more land to get the same output.
 

Legend

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2005
2,254
1
0
Originally posted by: saahmed
So dumbasses can spend more money and help our economy while killing themselves faster so they dont eat up our social security. lol.

Its proven that organic vegetables and fruits are more harmful than normal because they are not protected, theyre also bad for our environment because they use more land to get the same output.

Prove they are more harmful. I fail to see how greater biodiversity is harming the environment.

We've already posted studies discrediting the output comment. I posted studies showing how the pesticides make people sick near the farms that use them in conventional farming.
 

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
According to the FDA, the organic label means that inorganic fertilizers and pesticides were not used in the growing of the food.

So basically organic means "may be full of insects"?

just poop.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
According to the FDA, the organic label means that inorganic fertilizers and pesticides were not used in the growing of the food.

So basically organic means "may be full of insects"?

just poop.

Ever eaten ground hamburger? I hear they have fairly lax standards in terms of what can go into that stuff.