- Feb 19, 2001
- 20,155
- 23
- 81
Sorry for the dramatic headline but the way I look at it is that this product has probably had the worst possible execution so far.
Some of the fault has to be marketing too. When you go to Venmo's site, it's a quick and easy setup. Want to send money to your friends? Let's get started. Step 1, 2, 3 ,4... Wallet seems to be less straightforward. There's no appeal to anyone to use Wallet in fact. If they're not pushing people to use it as a product to send money to Bob or John, and there's no ability to pay a store around you directly and quickly, there's little appeal for the general public. Pushing it as an NFC payment method really shouldn't be the primary focus anymore... unless they're magically going to make NFC THE payment standard (given that it's gone nowhere in the past 3 years, I'm not convinced that strategy would work).
The execution has been piss poor at best. I'm just trying to imagine someone who developed Google Wallet and helped it launch. Either this is their level of competence, or they're sitting there helplessly while management completely ruins it with terrible execution.
Okay, enough ranting.
- Anytime I ask people to pay via Google Wallet, Venmo or PayPal are far more prevalent methods. Let's not even mention Chase QuickPay, or Bank of America transfers, which are just as limited in that they're US only and more limited in that they're limited to a specific financial institution; yet these bank payment systems are more popular.
- The spread of NFC payments has been... pathetic at best. Whether it's limiting the Google Wallet app to take only Citi cards or MasterCard for 2 years, and limiting itself to certain carriers, and phones, it's like we've gone nowhere since 2010 when the Nexus S was first announced with NFC payments.
- What about transit cards? I remember when NFC came onto phones and people (likely here at AT) were optimistic because Europe and Asia use transit cards all the time. Yet you can't pay with your phone today. Whether it's a technological limitation or whatever doesn't matter. I think many individuals were overly hopeful but didn't realize that NFC payments wouldn't spread very far.
- You can't pay a store directly? Take the PayPal app or the Square app. You can locate stores nearby that you can pay and go buy a coffee or a sandwich. You can't do this with Google Wallet. As cool as NFC payments is, what's even cooler is ordering from your phone or not even having to bring your phone to a kiosk or to rely on a kiosk. Just pay by app. To me this is a huge WTF. Google had Google Checkout since 2006 and they couldn't partner with stores to do mobile payments? Even though PayPal has been around longer, I highly doubt PayPal had setup payment systems with restaurants and cafes, so they clearly figured it out in a short amount of time since the mobile revolution.
Some of the fault has to be marketing too. When you go to Venmo's site, it's a quick and easy setup. Want to send money to your friends? Let's get started. Step 1, 2, 3 ,4... Wallet seems to be less straightforward. There's no appeal to anyone to use Wallet in fact. If they're not pushing people to use it as a product to send money to Bob or John, and there's no ability to pay a store around you directly and quickly, there's little appeal for the general public. Pushing it as an NFC payment method really shouldn't be the primary focus anymore... unless they're magically going to make NFC THE payment standard (given that it's gone nowhere in the past 3 years, I'm not convinced that strategy would work).
The execution has been piss poor at best. I'm just trying to imagine someone who developed Google Wallet and helped it launch. Either this is their level of competence, or they're sitting there helplessly while management completely ruins it with terrible execution.
Okay, enough ranting.
Last edited: