No amount of government regulation and good business practices can make up for the lack of competition in the marketplace caused by a government enforced coercive monopoly. In fact, I actually have to pay for the "priviledge" of this monopoly, via a monthly surcharge to the local cable regulatory commission.Originally posted by: Amused
I see lots of accusations of gouging and monopolistic price fixing and it's all conjecture until you show me the profit margins of cable companies and how those margins compare to other private companies.
This thread is a perfect example of people believing what they want to believe.
BTW, I am against the government sanctioned monopolies of utility and communication companies. But I have a strong suspicion that cable companies do not have the huge profit margins to support the accusations of gouging in this thread.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Rage187
Where we live now will not allow you to have dishes out in your yard or visible on the house.
That's illegal.
http://www.dish-free-satellite-system.com/hoas.html
Originally posted by: preslove
Content providers are also a big reason for expensive basic cable bill. If Cox Cable doesn't buy ESPN from Disney Corp. everyone will switch to sattelite. The problem is, Disney Corp. isn't just going to sell Cox ESPN, but it's going to force them to buy a PACKAGE of ESPN, ESPN 2, Disney Channel, and a few others at an inflated price because they know that Cox NEEDS ESPN. IMHO legislation needs to passed to outlaw that kind of packaging. It's extortion, plain and simple. I should be able to buy the channels I want and not pay for the freaking disney channel. Wacko Christian fundamentalists shouldn't have to pay for MTV, either.
Originally posted by: Sheep
Originally posted by: preslove
Content providers are also a big reason for expensive basic cable bill. If Cox Cable doesn't buy ESPN from Disney Corp. everyone will switch to sattelite. The problem is, Disney Corp. isn't just going to sell Cox ESPN, but it's going to force them to buy a PACKAGE of ESPN, ESPN 2, Disney Channel, and a few others at an inflated price because they know that Cox NEEDS ESPN. IMHO legislation needs to passed to outlaw that kind of packaging. It's extortion, plain and simple. I should be able to buy the channels I want and not pay for the freaking disney channel. Wacko Christian fundamentalists shouldn't have to pay for MTV, either.
<cable company>But giving consumers the choice of a la carte channels rather than a handful of tiers with 75% channels no one watches will lead to higher prices for everyone!</cable company>
Originally posted by: acemcmac
Topic Title: Why is cable so expensive?
$92 a month before taxes and after promo periods for a fvcking cable internet connection and the most basic of basic cable that has more than 15 channels.
That's insane. Where are those cantenna blueprints?!?
Oh, and apparantly I can't get DSL even though the house I just bought is in the middle of a goddamn city![]()
Originally posted by: altonb1
Originally posted by: MoPHo
demand for cable internet is up, so they can increase the price?
But shouldn't that also drive down prices? Demand may be up, but the capicity is (usually) not maxed. If they have the capacity to add subscribers, they should be able to lower the cost per subscriber and still make more money than the current pricing scheme.
Originally posted by: MoPHo
demand for cable internet is up, so they can increase the price?
Originally posted by: PingSpike
If I were running a monopoly, I would just charge more as well. I mean, when you have no competition you might as well maximize profits.
Originally posted by: miri
Because they have a Monopoly
Cable internet is the only highspeed internet available in my area
Even if DSL were available in my area, I would still need a land line which I dont have since I only use cellphones
Originally posted by: Vic
Legal coercive monopolies. It's not just that they have no competition, it's that the government prohibits any competition from entering the market by law.
In return, the government allows the corporate beneficiaries of these monopolies to charge the highest prices short of what will cause the people to riot, and then claims that the price is "capped" and "controlled" "in the public interest."
Originally posted by: MathMan
My only complaint with the cable and satellite companies is how they force you to choose a channel package instead of being able to pick channels a-la carte...
Originally posted by: yakko
It is for the children. WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!?!?!?!?!?!
Originally posted by: Amused
I see lots of accusations of gouging and monopolistic price fixing and it's all conjecture until you show me the profit margins of cable companies and how those margins compare to other private companies.
This thread is a perfect example of people believing what they want to believe.
BTW, I am against the government sanctioned monopolies of utility and communication companies. But I have a strong suspicion that cable companies do not have the huge profit margins to support the accusations of gouging in this thread.