Mixolydian
Lifer
My current Onkyo receiver is over 10 years old and has never had a single issue.
My current Onkyo receiver is over 10 years old and has never had a single issue.
when i was looking at receivers, onkyo was on my list ... until i did some research. they kind of have a recent track history of not lasting very long and going bad early. since i was going to be spending over $1k on a receiver, i went with a higher end denon instead and haven't had any issues with it in almost 2 years.
Why does everyone make Denon out to be expensive? Marantz is more expensive, but it's a higher end line. Denon is competitively price with many models at a variety of price points. No one is saying you have to buy the most expensive model, same with Onkyo. Onkyo makes expensive models as well. The difference is they seemed to be plagued with QA issues. Makes it hard to recommend.
The Yamaha I have for my main system is rock solid. I have an Onkyo that I use for my computer that's lasted for about ten years.
I think an Onkyo is still good bang for the buck. From everything I've seen, though, they run too hot, though. If I bought an Onkyo I'd rig up a fan. There are a lot of good receivers brands nowadays, imho. Yes there are some variances in sound to receivers, but, personally, I think they really only show up when you get to speakers that cost magnitudes more than the receivers.
As quickly as connection technology changes (Component, HDMI 1, 1.4, 2.0) sometimes it's not worth it to get a top of the line receiver that you have to replace quickly. Onkyo occupies the "replace in a few years to keep up with technology" niche. Personally, once you get to the expensive receiver area (>$1000) I think people are better served with preamp/amp combinations.