Why has healthcare suddenly become a problem?

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
From blog.fearnoevil.anandtech.com:

In the spirit of 'Where were the Republicans for the past 8 years on spending?' I have to ask the same about Healthcare. Where have the Democrats been for the past 8 years on Healthcare? Why did we hear virtually NOTHING about it until Bush's term was over? Why is it suddenly now a problem so important that we cannot wait even weeks to pass reform?

If one were to believe many in this forum in that the Healthcare system is nearly to the point of collapse.. people cannot get insurance to pay, they are going bankrupt left and right, people are dying because of denied procedures.. etc.. Shouldn't there have been a stronger push for this before BHO was elected if this was so out of control?

Pretty much all we heard for the majority of Bush's term was WAR WAR WAR, CRIMES CRIMES CRIMES, DEAD SOLDIERS, HALIBURTON, and CHENEY. I don't remember the democrats EVER really bringing up Healthcare problems during this time. It certainly wasn't enough to drown out the voices calling for investigations on important issues like the firing of US Attorneys. :roll:

So, can we apply the same logic thats being thrown at Republicans and say Democrats have no official right to complain, since they should have been doing it for at least the last few years. And since they have no right to complain, we should just continue with the status quo or even let the problem get worse? I mean, if we can double or triple deficits we can handle the current healthcare system for at least a few more years right? Why the rush?

Here's what I think is happening.. The Democrats had a ton of political capital to spend because of the huge support for President Obama. Rahm Emanuel and crew needed a 9/11 of their own to ram massive govern reform through. None came. So they made one up. Healthcare! Its a massive part of the economy, everyone needs it, and the insurance companies make a GREAT scapegoat. NOBODY likes them. Just start repeating over and over that its a crisis, find some people who had bad care and throw them out there, and organize your astroturfers to start chanting 'HEALTH CARE NOW' at every speech.

Brilliant! Well, not quite. The one thing people trust less than insurance companies is big government promises. Its starting to fall apart now that people realize what a massive change Obama and crew were trying to shove down our throats with little to no oversight on what the plan actually does and how much it costs. The plan is starting to fall apart and with it the likelyhood of any major reform.

I'm honestly not sure how we get past this. Healthcare does need reform, but it doesn't need a 180 degree turn in the opposite direction. I think Obama and Rahm bit off more than they could chew and now they can't stop trying to choke it down.. like some sort of rabid dog who just found a rotten piece of meat at the side of the road. You aren't going to reason with the starving dog to stop trying to swallow the disease infected piece of meat.. so you just kind of sit there and watch in amazement as they attempt to swallow it all in one huge chunk.

What we need is Obama to be the President he promised to be. Someone who truly does reach across the isle and tries to work with the opposition. We need less TV speeches spewing the same hate and fear tactics used for the past 8 years and more listening. We need someone who is going to LISTEN to the people and our concerns and not just say IT MUST ALL BE DISMANTLED and I know whats best for you.

There have been many promises of the government over the past 200+ years that they have not kept.. we are distrustful and wary of government. I don't trust the government to handle the formulation of my gasoline without screwing it up (MTBE anyone?) let alone letting them handle my healthcare. If Obama can work with both sides and come up with a plan that doesn't alienate 50% of the population, I think reform can work. Otherwise I think its doomed for failure and an even greater divide between left and right in this country.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,734
54,747
136
Uhmm, the Democrats have been trying to reform the health care system for decades.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
1993? And they haven't been in power since? Moron... why would they bring it up with Bush in power when they were shut down with a democratic president in 93?
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
1993? And they haven't been in power since? Moron... why would they bring it up with Bush in power when they were shut down with a democratic president in 93?

I appreciate the name calling, and that certainly does help move us toward reform. :roll:

The reason why it would be brought up during a Bush Presidency is because Bush on some issues I think was more liberal than Clinton. Clinton went pretty moderate for most of his Presidency. Bush passed a massive expansion to drug coverage and didn't seem to mind large deficits.

But we're being told this is a CRISIS.. it needs to be acted upon NOW.. not in 3 months, not in a year.. NOW. If Healthcare is truly that bad, should the democrats not have been hammering on it for the past 8? Or is this not truly a crisis?
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Health care reform has been attempted for over 100 years and has been beaten by FEAR each and every time. There was no reason to try to reform it as long as Bush (or any GOP power for that matter) was in office to face a certain VETO. History shows that when in doubt, whip the fear out (and so far, it has worked). This is the best chance in nearly 100 years to get it passed, so sure, they are going to try to nail it to the board and make it stick...any way they can.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,734
54,747
136
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
1993? And they haven't been in power since? Moron... why would they bring it up with Bush in power when they were shut down with a democratic president in 93?

I appreciate the name calling, and that certainly does help move us toward reform. :roll:

The reason why it would be brought up during a Bush Presidency is because Bush on some issues I think was more liberal than Clinton. Clinton went pretty moderate for most of his Presidency. Bush passed a massive expansion to drug coverage and didn't seem to mind large deficits.

But we're being told this is a CRISIS.. it needs to be acted upon NOW.. not in 3 months, not in a year.. NOW. If Healthcare is truly that bad, should the democrats not have been hammering on it for the past 8? Or is this not truly a crisis?

They had no ability to pass a bill that they thought would fix the health care system under Bush. Once again, the Democrats have been pushing for this (and yes, telling us that it was a looming crisis), for decades.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
1993? And they haven't been in power since? Moron... why would they bring it up with Bush in power when they were shut down with a democratic president in 93?

I appreciate the name calling, and that certainly does help move us toward reform. :roll:

The reason why it would be brought up during a Bush Presidency is because Bush on some issues I think was more liberal than Clinton. Clinton went pretty moderate for most of his Presidency. Bush passed a massive expansion to drug coverage and didn't seem to mind large deficits.

But we're being told this is a CRISIS.. it needs to be acted upon NOW.. not in 3 months, not in a year.. NOW. If Healthcare is truly that bad, should the democrats not have been hammering on it for the past 8? Or is this not truly a crisis?

They had no ability to pass a bill that they thought would fix the health care system under Bush. Once again, the Democrats have been pushing for this (and yes, telling us that it was a looming crisis), for decades.

So you are entirely missing my point then. If this has been looming for DECADES, and could wait through 8 years of Bush. Then this this not truly a CRISIS? Or is the crisis more that democrats have to pass it fast to avoid it being shot down?

If McCain was elected would Healthcare just wait other 4-8 years?
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Engineer
Health care reform has been attempted for over 100 years and has been beaten by FEAR each and every time. There was no reason to try to reform it as long as Bush (or any GOP power for that matter) was in office to face a certain VETO. History shows that when in doubt, whip the fear out (and so far, it has worked). This is the best chance in nearly 100 years to get it passed, so sure, they are going to try to nail it to the board and make it stick...any way they can.

So now we've gone from DECADES, to over a CENTURY of attempted reform... (All Democratic I am sure.. ) Yet this needed to be passed in a couple weeks of it being introduced?
 

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
I would explain, but talking to you is like talking to a table:) Aren't you missing a tea party somewhere?
 

bl4ckfl4g

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2007
3,669
0
0
LOL this is a joke/shens thread right? They try everytime they have majorities and the presidency. Also, it has been more than "weeks" since this discussion started.

I stopped reading after that because I figure it must be a joke.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Engineer
Health care reform has been attempted for over 100 years and has been beaten by FEAR each and every time. There was no reason to try to reform it as long as Bush (or any GOP power for that matter) was in office to face a certain VETO. History shows that when in doubt, whip the fear out (and so far, it has worked). This is the best chance in nearly 100 years to get it passed, so sure, they are going to try to nail it to the board and make it stick...any way they can.

So now we've gone from DECADES, to over a CENTURY of attempted reform... (All Democratic I am sure.. ) Yet this needed to be passed in a couple weeks of it being introduced?

The funny thing about legislation like this is that if it's not passed quickly (and decisively for that matter, it "usually" won't make it at all. History has taught us that on both sides (See SS reform a few years ago).
 

Firebot

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2005
1,476
2
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
From blog.fearnoevil.anandtech.com:

In the spirit of 'Where were the Republicans for the past 8 years on spending?' I have to ask the same about Healthcare. Where have the Democrats been for the past 8 years on Healthcare? Why did we hear virtually NOTHING about it until Bush's term was over? Why is it suddenly now a problem so important that we cannot wait even weeks to pass reform?

If one were to believe many in this forum in that the Healthcare system is nearly to the point of collapse.. people cannot get insurance to pay, they are going bankrupt left and right, people are dying because of denied procedures.. etc.. Shouldn't there have been a stronger push for this before BHO was elected if this was so out of control?

Pretty much all we heard for the majority of Bush's term was WAR WAR WAR, CRIMES CRIMES CRIMES, DEAD SOLDIERS, HALIBURTON, and CHENEY. I don't remember the democrats EVER really bringing up Healthcare problems during this time. It certainly wasn't enough to drown out the voices calling for investigations on important issues like the firing of US Attorneys. :roll:

So, can we apply the same logic thats being thrown at Republicans and say Democrats have no official right to complain, since they should have been doing it for at least the last few years. And since they have no right to complain, we should just continue with the status quo or even let the problem get worse? I mean, if we can double or triple deficits we can handle the current healthcare system for at least a few more years right? Why the rush?

Here's what I think is happening.. The Democrats had a ton of political capital to spend because of the huge support for President Obama. Rahm Emanuel and crew needed a 9/11 of their own to ram massive govern reform through. None came. So they made one up. Healthcare! Its a massive part of the economy, everyone needs it, and the insurance companies make a GREAT scapegoat. NOBODY likes them. Just start repeating over and over that its a crisis, find some people who had bad care and throw them out there, and organize your astroturfers to start chanting 'HEALTH CARE NOW' at every speech.

Brilliant! Well, not quite. The one thing people trust less than insurance companies is big government promises. Its starting to fall apart now that people realize what a massive change Obama and crew were trying to shove down our throats with little to no oversight on what the plan actually does and how much it costs. The plan is starting to fall apart and with it the likelyhood of any major reform.

I'm honestly not sure how we get past this. Healthcare does need reform, but it doesn't need a 180 degree turn in the opposite direction. I think Obama and Rahm bit off more than they could chew and now they can't stop trying to choke it down.. like some sort of rabid dog who just found a rotten piece of meat at the side of the road. You aren't going to reason with the starving dog to stop trying to swallow the disease infected piece of meat.. so you just kind of sit there and watch in amazement as they attempt to swallow it all in one huge chunk.

What we need is Obama to be the President he promised to be. Someone who truly does reach across the isle and tries to work with the opposition. We need less TV speeches spewing the same hate and fear tactics used for the past 8 years and more listening. We need someone who is going to LISTEN to the people and our concerns and not just say IT MUST ALL BE DISMANTLED and I know whats best for you.

There have been many promises of the government over the past 200+ years that they have not kept.. we are distrustful and wary of government. I don't trust the government to handle the formulation of my gasoline without screwing it up (MTBE anyone?) let alone letting them handle my healthcare. If Obama can work with both sides and come up with a plan that doesn't alienate 50% of the population, I think reform can work. Otherwise I think its doomed for failure and an even greater divide between left and right in this country.

Healthcare has always been a problem. It's Republicans and the lobbyists who support them who suddenly are up in arms about healthcare now that the Democrats have the power to actually do something about healthcare. Before Obama got in his candidate position you'd never hear about Canada's horror healthcare stories and how the Britain NHS kills cancer patients. There's been an influx of anti UHC posts ever since Obama won the nomination.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: bl4ckfl4g
LOL this is a joke/shens thread right? They try everytime they have majorities and the presidency. Also, it has been more than "weeks" since this discussion started.

I stopped reading after that because I figure it must be a joke.

Its NOW been weeks since it was introduced. But when it was first introduced Obama wanted a vote extremely quickly. Fortunately we've now had some time to look at it and its got even less support.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,515
9,733
136
Sooner we get it done, the sooner we vote on it before the politicians think about their reelection in 2010. It?s like they actually have to hide from their constituents. That?s why we have to rush it through.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Engineer
Health care reform has been attempted for over 100 years and has been beaten by FEAR each and every time. There was no reason to try to reform it as long as Bush (or any GOP power for that matter) was in office to face a certain VETO. History shows that when in doubt, whip the fear out (and so far, it has worked). This is the best chance in nearly 100 years to get it passed, so sure, they are going to try to nail it to the board and make it stick...any way they can.

So now we've gone from DECADES, to over a CENTURY of attempted reform... (All Democratic I am sure.. ) Yet this needed to be passed in a couple weeks of it being introduced?

The funny thing about legislation like this is that if it's not passed quickly (and decisively for that matter, it "usually" won't make it at all. History has taught us that on both sides (See SS reform a few years ago).

Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Should we be ramming bills through that impact 1/6th of the economy (Whatever that # is) and could make life of death healthcare decisions for people in a matter of weeks?

All the serious responses in this thread (There have only been a few) seem to so far point to their not really being a crisis, but the crisis being more about getting this passed before support drops for it. Just as fear shouldn't be used to prevent a bill from passing, it shouldn't be used to PASS a bill either. If we can't even get a majority of democrats to agree that this bill is good.. Maybe it needs some rethinking?
 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
Are you kidding me? Are you dense?

The Democrats were branded with the Scarlet Letter during the Bush Presidency. They were the minority party for 6 years. On top of that, when they did win a majority in the last two years, they didn't have a filibuster proof vote nor the good wishes of GWB. It's almost certain that any attempt at reform would have met with the same hostility seen today PLUS an instant veto from President Bush.
 

bl4ckfl4g

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2007
3,669
0
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: bl4ckfl4g
LOL this is a joke/shens thread right? They try everytime they have majorities and the presidency. Also, it has been more than "weeks" since this discussion started.

I stopped reading after that because I figure it must be a joke.

Its NOW been weeks since it was introduced. But when it was first introduced Obama wanted a vote extremely quickly. Fortunately we've now had some time to look at it and its got even less support.

You didn't answer the question though, is this a joke thread?
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
The Democrats have only had a majority of Congress since 2006, and that was a slim one. They have only occupied the White House for this past year. Considering that they have both of these things now and it's still a major battle to get healthcare reform passed, it's not really very difficult to ascertain why the issue was on the backburner for about a decade.

Bad military analogy: If you are going to launch a major attack to accomplish a key objective in a war, would you attack when you have barely enough people to pull it off, or wait a bit longer and power it through with a large numeric advantage on your side?
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
From blog.fearnoevil.anandtech.com:

In the spirit of 'Where were the Republicans for the past 8 years on spending?' I have to ask the same about Healthcare. Where have the Democrats been for the past 8 years on Healthcare? Why did we hear virtually NOTHING about it until Bush's term was over? Why is it suddenly now a problem so important that we cannot wait even weeks to pass reform?

If one were to believe many in this forum in that the Healthcare system is nearly to the point of collapse.. people cannot get insurance to pay, they are going bankrupt left and right, people are dying because of denied procedures.. etc.. Shouldn't there have been a stronger push for this before BHO was elected if this was so out of control?

Pretty much all we heard for the majority of Bush's term was WAR WAR WAR, CRIMES CRIMES CRIMES, DEAD SOLDIERS, HALIBURTON, and CHENEY. I don't remember the democrats EVER really bringing up Healthcare problems during this time. It certainly wasn't enough to drown out the voices calling for investigations on important issues like the firing of US Attorneys. :roll:

So, can we apply the same logic thats being thrown at Republicans and say Democrats have no official right to complain, since they should have been doing it for at least the last few years. And since they have no right to complain, we should just continue with the status quo or even let the problem get worse? I mean, if we can double or triple deficits we can handle the current healthcare system for at least a few more years right? Why the rush?

Here's what I think is happening.. The Democrats had a ton of political capital to spend because of the huge support for President Obama. Rahm Emanuel and crew needed a 9/11 of their own to ram massive govern reform through. None came. So they made one up. Healthcare! Its a massive part of the economy, everyone needs it, and the insurance companies make a GREAT scapegoat. NOBODY likes them. Just start repeating over and over that its a crisis, find some people who had bad care and throw them out there, and organize your astroturfers to start chanting 'HEALTH CARE NOW' at every speech.

Brilliant! Well, not quite. The one thing people trust less than insurance companies is big government promises. Its starting to fall apart now that people realize what a massive change Obama and crew were trying to shove down our throats with little to no oversight on what the plan actually does and how much it costs. The plan is starting to fall apart and with it the likelyhood of any major reform.

I'm honestly not sure how we get past this. Healthcare does need reform, but it doesn't need a 180 degree turn in the opposite direction. I think Obama and Rahm bit off more than they could chew and now they can't stop trying to choke it down.. like some sort of rabid dog who just found a rotten piece of meat at the side of the road. You aren't going to reason with the starving dog to stop trying to swallow the disease infected piece of meat.. so you just kind of sit there and watch in amazement as they attempt to swallow it all in one huge chunk.

What we need is Obama to be the President he promised to be. Someone who truly does reach across the isle and tries to work with the opposition. We need less TV speeches spewing the same hate and fear tactics used for the past 8 years and more listening. We need someone who is going to LISTEN to the people and our concerns and not just say IT MUST ALL BE DISMANTLED and I know whats best for you.

There have been many promises of the government over the past 200+ years that they have not kept.. we are distrustful and wary of government. I don't trust the government to handle the formulation of my gasoline without screwing it up (MTBE anyone?) let alone letting them handle my healthcare. If Obama can work with both sides and come up with a plan that doesn't alienate 50% of the population, I think reform can work. Otherwise I think its doomed for failure and an even greater divide between left and right in this country.

I don't know whether to pity you or laugh at you for typing all that out when the entire premise of your post was utterly ridiculous from the moment you typed the Topic Title and Summary
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
It's like conservatives experience de-evolution or something. How is it possible for you guys to get DUMBER than you already are?
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
I can't respond to your question, clearly it's a trap.

I do appreciate you accusing the president of manufacturing a fake healthcare crisis in one breath and in the next issue a call to bipartisanship and lamenting the left/right divide. Very inspiring.