Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
heh.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Where's our resident 24 year-old, now? lololol
How many enterprise level firewalls have you setup? How many enterprise IDS systems? The database server? Sure. The rest? Generally not.
You said 256MB, and having a working server of any real capacity, it's impossible on that amount of memory. Once everything's loaded up (oh, and *nix has it's security ware more than a firewall -- but why software? -- from exploits too), 256MB is long gone.
Not even close. It's good, but doesn't have the added security of OpenBSD, especially on good hardware (AMD64, sparc64, sparc).
This is interesting, I wonder why it sounds familiar.....hmmm:
http://distrowatch.com/dwres.p...esource=review-openbsd
"Needless to say, OpenBSD is not a solo project. Working with Theo are about 15 core developers who do the lion's share of the work, plus another 50 active contributors (the exact number fluctuates). Software developers tend to be very opinionated, and the OpenBSD hierarchy deals with the inevitable personality conflicts by making Theo the "benign dictator" - Theo has the final word about what does and does not go into the operating system. As a result, you will rarely find OpenBSD being "indecisive", and most of the developers see this as a strength. This is in sharp contrast to some other open source projects where a core team of programmers tries to do things by consensus."
And...
Though encryption is important, the real key to OpenBSD's success is "code auditing." Quite simply, this means the process of manually hunting down bugs in the source code. Not just bugs in the OpenBSD kernel or userland, but in essential third-party packages (such as the Apache web server). Cleaning up the coding mistakes of others is a time-consuming and endless task, but it pays big dividends. Aside from enhanced security, the code auditing seems to improve stability. I can truthfully say that I have not experienced a single crash since I installed OpenBSD."
The stuff I edited out I didn't have any reason to comment on.![]()