• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Why don't they always use the highest warp in Star Trek?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
12,035
1,133
126
Uh oh... I detect a disturbance of the space/time continuum :^D Jeordi definitely said they were going past warp 10 when it happened, but they never calculated a final speed.

The chart shows warp 10 as infinite. I think the problem is the floating values for warp speeds, nothing is set in stone.
 

PlasmaBomb

Lifer
Nov 19, 2004
11,636
2
81
Higher speeds are less efficient, and stress the engines and structural integrity field more, like in a car.
If you'd always drive at the highest speed your engine could handle, sure you'd get to your destination quick - assuming the engine could survive the trip.

The nice thing is that on Earth if your engine breaks down your generally aren't too far from civilization...

The same can't be said for space.

Also aren't the energy requirements supposed to go up exponentially?
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,363
17,924
126
I just have to post this

space_comparison_chart_huge.jpeg
 

PlasmaBomb

Lifer
Nov 19, 2004
11,636
2
81
There is the warp 13 rule. Once you hit warp 13, it only takes a week to cross the universe. Gene Roddenberry touched on this in one of his interviews. TNG only did this speed once in the final episode. That is they keep the speed down. The subspace rift was something the TNG brought up, but max warp was set back on TOS.

The warp speed scale from TOS isn't the same as in TNG...
 

PlasmaBomb

Lifer
Nov 19, 2004
11,636
2
81
Ok some explain to how they went back in time to get the whales in the one Star Track movie. Did they use warp speed to do that? Some how warp speed make you go back in time.

Wasn't that some kind of warp/gravity do hicky?
 

GrumpyMan

Diamond Member
May 14, 2001
5,780
266
136
You don't need a space ship anymore, just jump into the Stargate and you get spit out on the other planet. Unless you want to hang around in dark matter all the time of course.
 

EricMartello

Senior member
Apr 17, 2003
910
0
0
Based on what I could gather from the show it is the same reason you wouldn't drive your car by keeping the engine at the redline all the time.

Efficiency: The antimatter fuel it uses is expendable and not infinite.

Reliability: Higher warp puts more stress on the structure of the ship.

Uptime: Duty cycle of the engines operating near maximum will increase maintenance intervals and downtime.

And yea, I just saw that episode about warp fields making subspace rifts on SciFi the other day...I didn't like it much either, too much liberal environmentalist propaganda in there.
 

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
I'm more curious about how special relativity doesn't seem to apply. The faster you go, the more time slows down in the universe relative to your ship.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Last edited:

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,363
17,924
126
Full power to structural integrity and forward shield

Ramming speed!
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,073
3,576
126
Edit:
they went 2,700,000 light years in a few minutes. If anyone wants to do the warp calculations on that :^D

asgard hyperdrive from SG-1 > TNG warp engines.

little gray men with big eyes should not be underestimated.
 

PsiStar

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2005
1,184
0
76
They grew up in a previous generation & had no idea what WOT means or could be done.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
What do you expect from a namby pamby communist Federation where people only listen to classical music, paint, and watch Shakespeare for entertainment?
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
This thread has broken the Nerd Barrier.
It's in an uncharted region of Nerdom.