• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why don't some ebay sellers offer combined shipping?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Dezign
I won a skirt for $3 from a seller for $6 shipping. I bid on a few of her other items hoping to add them to the package, and ended up winning a light tank top for $2 and another for $3. All in all, the items undoubtedly weighed less than a pound, easy to ship for $3.95 priority mail (or however much it costs now).

I was appalled when the seller told me my total was $8 for the clothes + $18 shipping. She said she wouldn't combine shipping because I was "already getting a great deal on the clothes" (I think she was upset she didn't get more money for them), but I told her there was no way in heck I was going to pay $18 shipping for what would cost her no more than $4 to mail (probably less, I recently paid $6 shipping for an item that cost 88-cents to ship... seller said priority mail, shipped it freakin' first class).

Anyway, she absolutely refused to lower the shipping price or even compromise/reduce it, I refused to pay, got 3 "Non-paying bidder" warnings and was summarily kicked off ebay. 🙁:|

As you should have. Sure, it would have been nice of her to combine them, but you knew the shipping costs when you bid and so you are legally bound to pay the price. You entered a legally binding contract and are now backing out

shame on you.
 
Originally posted by: slag
Originally posted by: Dezign
I won a skirt for $3 from a seller for $6 shipping. I bid on a few of her other items hoping to add them to the package, and ended up winning a light tank top for $2 and another for $3. All in all, the items undoubtedly weighed less than a pound, easy to ship for $3.95 priority mail (or however much it costs now).

I was appalled when the seller told me my total was $8 for the clothes + $18 shipping. She said she wouldn't combine shipping because I was "already getting a great deal on the clothes" (I think she was upset she didn't get more money for them), but I told her there was no way in heck I was going to pay $18 shipping for what would cost her no more than $4 to mail (probably less, I recently paid $6 shipping for an item that cost 88-cents to ship... seller said priority mail, shipped it freakin' first class).

Anyway, she absolutely refused to lower the shipping price or even compromise/reduce it, I refused to pay, got 3 "Non-paying bidder" warnings and was summarily kicked off ebay. 🙁:|

As you should have. Sure, it would have been nice of her to combine them, but you knew the shipping costs when you bid and so you are legally bound to pay the price. You entered a legally binding contract and are now backing out

shame on you.
Yup, basically what I was going to say. Once you've won, you can't just refuse to pay because you don't like their terms.

Unless the auctioneer says they combine shipping, you must assume they don't.
 
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: Jzero
I say good luck pursuing those.
The shipping charge includes the "handling" cost, and it's easy to argue that those handling costs are assessed per item/auction, not per shipment.

The bottom line is that it's up to the buyer to make sure he's clear on the terms of the auctions BEFORE bidding.

Wouldn't be as hard as you think, especially if the seller ships USPS like many do. If the seller says they won't combine shipping, but they do anyway and you pay $30 in shipping that they spend $4 on, you've got a pretty strong mail fraud case.

also, it can get as technical as there is a seperation bewteen shipping costs (actual charge from say USPS) and handling costs. unless specifically noted in the auction, shipping and hadnling are usually ONE charge or a single fee, but they can just as easily be seperated.

So thus, the "shipping" charge does not always include the handling costs.
 
Originally posted by: masterxfob
i was charged $20 S&H for a package that cost $3 to mail, i left neutral feedback.


Did the seller have the shipping charges listed on the auction? Or did he blindside you
with them?
 
True, I shouldn't have assumed. My bad, I wasn't aware that was how things worked and now I am (thanks to those who kindly helped/informed me, vs. those who took it as another opportunity to personally bash me... people make mistakes, it happens and they learn from them).

Lesson learned for future reference, gracias.
 
Originally posted by: Dezign
True, I shouldn't have assumed. My bad, I wasn't aware that was how things worked and now I am (thanks to those who kindly helped/informed me, vs. those who took it as another opportunity to personally bash me... people make mistakes, it happens and they learn from them).

Lesson learned for future reference, gracias.
Yep, that's what life is all about. 🙂 As long as you learn, it's all good.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Dezign
True, I shouldn't have assumed. My bad, I wasn't aware that was how things worked and now I am (thanks to those who kindly helped/informed me, vs. those who took it as another opportunity to personally bash me... people make mistakes, it happens and they learn from them).

Lesson learned for future reference, gracias.
Yep, that's what life is all about. 🙂 As long as you learn, it's all good.

I feel like I'm on an episode of leave it to Beaver...
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Dezign
True, I shouldn't have assumed. My bad, I wasn't aware that was how things worked and now I am (thanks to those who kindly helped/informed me, vs. those who took it as another opportunity to personally bash me... people make mistakes, it happens and they learn from them).

Lesson learned for future reference, gracias.
Yep, that's what life is all about. 🙂 As long as you learn, it's all good.

He's learning a bit late though, if he had learned earlier then there would have been no need for him to waste the seller's time and get banned.
 
Originally posted by: kami333
He's learning a bit late though, if he had learned earlier then there would have been no need for him to waste the seller's time and get banned.

"Good decisions come from knowledge. Knowledge comes from experience. And experience comes from bad decisions." It's never too late.
 
One thing about it.....getting an Ebay ID is easy enough.....trolls
do it over and over again 🙂

The thing to have done would have to honored the bids and paid the shipping
and moved on and learned that the 1st rule of Ebay is that if it's not listed
don't assume anything.

Most of these people selling cheap items make their money on shipping and handling
charges rather than the items they sell.

I see a lot of negative feedback posts left by people who "win" items and then
want to dicker with the seller on the clearly posted shipping fees after the auction
is over.

Lesson is as in everything in life is to read the fine print (all of it) and make no
assumptions on anything.
 
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: Jzero
I say good luck pursuing those.
The shipping charge includes the "handling" cost, and it's easy to argue that those handling costs are assessed per item/auction, not per shipment.

The bottom line is that it's up to the buyer to make sure he's clear on the terms of the auctions BEFORE bidding.

Wouldn't be as hard as you think, especially if the seller ships USPS like many do. If the seller says they won't combine shipping, but they do anyway and you pay $30 in shipping that they spend $4 on, you've got a pretty strong mail fraud case.

Mail fraud implies intent and a pattern of activity. People love to throw "mail fraud" around when they didn't get their way, without realizing that a court would not consider it anything remotely close to being so.

There's no intent to defraud if I flat out tell you that it's $6 per item and I will not offer a discount if you order multiple items, regardless of the quantity of boxes or actual postage cost. The terms are crystal clear - there is no misrepresentation here.

Again, good luck trying to pull this off.
 
As already mentioned: you bid, you agree to whatever's listed in the description. When I see an item I'm interested in, I ask the buyer certain questions so as to not get screwed later.

Some "Power Sellers" handle a 100+ shipments/day. They have processes to get an item shipped, and they often pre-pack an item so it's ready to go when the auction ends. Backtracking and combining your winnings would be a real PITA for them. Don't get me wrong, I think it stinks and is very frustrating. But that's just how they do it.

If your seller was not a power seller... then, I dunno.
 
Here is the deal, each ebay merchant is a *private* shop. They set their own rules and not the other way around (ebay mostly has guidelines it takes a blatant act to really get something pulled down or in trouble, you can even get away with being caught shill bid 1 time).

Now most auctions state the shipping plain as day within the auction. Sure it may be more than what the stamp costs, but boxes, travel, waiting in line, tape, markers, paper, ink, etc all add up and with an auction you aren't getting the liberty of knowing your sales price each time and having the 'hard costs' built in. The debate that "shipping is a required part of the purchase" is true and not. The costs should not have to be bourne by the seller esp if by doing so they would take a loss. This 9 times out of 10 is what the buyer is hoping for....they won the item at a 'fair price' once shippng and price is considered, however the shipping was marked up to justify that. Now they are hoping to force the seller to lower the shipping end and get the item below cost....this is more dishonest than inflating the shipping cost a tad to avoid extra fees (which I dont do).

Still you can't win with most buyers if your shipping is more than the winning bid, even if you are charging actual shipping. I had many items I used to offer not to profit so much as to help someone that may need the part out...my items would sell at $1-10 or so and be a good deal, but many times these items were 5, 10, 15 or more pounds and the buyer would cry about I was out to rip them off, so now I just trash the parts.

Now as far as combining items....sometimes there are legitimate reasons. Many times larger items cannot be combined without entering an Oversize category or requiring difficult packaging. A lot of high volume shippers pre package their items and merely print off postage and send.

The bottom line you have to ask yourself is did you pay a fair price once all is said and done, and if you did (not necessarily the lowest, that is another 'ebay' misconception that all prices on ebay should be the lowest anywhere), then be happy with your items, if you didn't and the guy misrepresented something or flat out lied...then take action.

Å
 
Originally posted by: xboxist
As already mentioned: you bid, you agree to whatever's listed in the description. When I see an item I'm interested in, I ask the buyer certain questions so as to not get screwed later.

Some "Power Sellers" handle a 100+ shipments/day. They have processes to get an item shipped, and they often pre-pack an item so it's ready to go when the auction ends. Backtracking and combining your winnings would be a real PITA for them. Don't get me wrong, I think it stinks and is very frustrating. But that's just how they do it.

If your seller was not a power seller... then, I dunno.


I do things this way..
 
Originally posted by: kami333
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Dezign
True, I shouldn't have assumed. My bad, I wasn't aware that was how things worked and now I am (thanks to those who kindly helped/informed me, vs. those who took it as another opportunity to personally bash me... people make mistakes, it happens and they learn from them).

Lesson learned for future reference, gracias.
Yep, that's what life is all about. 🙂 As long as you learn, it's all good.

He's learning a bit late though, if he had learned earlier then there would have been no need for him to waste the seller's time and get banned.

I think he is a she
 
Originally posted by: alkemystStill you can't win with most buyers if your shipping is more than the winning bid, even if you are charging actual shipping. I had many items I used to offer not to profit so much as to help someone that may need the part out...my items would sell at $1-10 or so and be a good deal, but many times these items were 5, 10, 15 or more pounds and the buyer would cry about I was out to rip them off, so now I just trash the parts.
Å

Computer monitors are a good example of this. An older 14in SVGA in good condition is easily worth $15. But its a heavy monitor would likely cost at least $20 to ship, often $30 in my experience when you factor in handling, etc. A 14in used monitor isn't really worth $45 to most people...so you're stuck with it. Thats why monitors are so hard to get rid of, even when they're working.
 
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: Jzero
I say good luck pursuing those.
The shipping charge includes the "handling" cost, and it's easy to argue that those handling costs are assessed per item/auction, not per shipment.

The bottom line is that it's up to the buyer to make sure he's clear on the terms of the auctions BEFORE bidding.

Wouldn't be as hard as you think, especially if the seller ships USPS like many do. If the seller says they won't combine shipping, but they do anyway and you pay $30 in shipping that they spend $4 on, you've got a pretty strong mail fraud case.


no...you don't. That's not mail fraud.
 
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats

no...you don't. That's not mail fraud.

I missed that point....people can't be this stupid. The USPS could give two craps what someone charges you for shipping, they could care less if they told you $100 and they got away with a postcard...the only thing the USPS would care about is if you didn't get what was promised or you got an illegal method of payment.

I believe somewhere on their website they mention they do not handle shipping *cost* disputes.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Dezign
True, I shouldn't have assumed. My bad, I wasn't aware that was how things worked and now I am (thanks to those who kindly helped/informed me, vs. those who took it as another opportunity to personally bash me... people make mistakes, it happens and they learn from them).

Lesson learned for future reference, gracias.
Yep, that's what life is all about. 🙂 As long as you learn, it's all good.

Agreed. 🙂 My feedback before everything happened. I may create a new ID in the future, but for now I need to save money (moving into a new place, have to penny pinch) so maybe being banned for now is a good thing.
 
What I don't understand is this one incident cannot get you banned. The other two non-paying bidders had to come from two other sellers.
 
Originally posted by: alkemyst
What I don't understand is this one incident cannot get you banned. The other two non-paying bidders had to come from two other sellers.

Good catch, I forgot about that🙂
 
Back
Top