I stand by my statement.
Resale price is hard data, it is objective data, you're equivocating.
I don't think that you understand what equivocating means. This began with the following statement:
Apple products are superior for their resale value alone imho.
And let's link that statement to this one:
it's also clear that android fans like to state the deciding factors for EVERYONE, it's the weird green army conformity thing, which strikes me as odd based on how often thy fling the term "sheeple."
To quickly highlight (within the matter of a few posts) something quite funny. Nowhere did I attempt to state a deciding factor for everyone, I merely pointed out that battery life is important to everyone. Whereas resale value is not. So your accusation, slackerinabox, applies to QueBert's post rather aptly. And generic behaviour that I have tried to describe.
Now, more on the substance:
I think we can settle the question this way: resale value is objective, but it's just one data point in a larger sea of them, and probably not the main determining factor. After all, you buy a phone for the hardware, not the cash you'll get when you sell it.
Battery life is definitely more important for a phone, but it would be wrong to say that this one advantage is so important that it outweighs everything else. The Xperia Z3 is not completely superior to the iPhone because it does one thing better (and arguably, the 6 Plus/6s Plus have similar longevity). Many have noted that the iPhone still takes better pictures despite the resolution difference, and it should be more comfortable to hold. It'll get timelier updates, too. The Z3 is absolutely a better phone for some folks... it's just not the unquestioned champion.
And nowhere did I say that it is the unquestioned champion - there are better phones than the Z3. My posts in this thread have been designed to explain why the iPhone (and more broadly, Apple's products) are not the amazing be all and end all in hardware that exists. And that plenty of people who 'have money' do not buy iPhones because they do not find them so impressive. I valued battery life above all when I bought the Z3 and, well, it did extremely well in that category while still taking good photos and good videos, was comfortable to hold and had an SD card slot so that I could - store the photos and videos on the phone and easily transfer them.
To support my position, I showed that the iPhone 6/6 plus battery life leads some in my business world to use battery packs whereas I have not needed to use one with my Z3 while
at the same time facing ridicule for apparently owning a vastly inferior product.
And because people don't buy into the Apple superiority complex that accompanies the hardware, I described this as one (of many answers) to show why the iPhone does not sell more than it already does. Nowhere did I say that it is a bad phone. Just that it is not as "superior" as people make it out to be.
And finally, there is a semantics problem here. You can measure resale value but you do not infer from the fact that the resale value of x is higher than the resale value of y that x is therefore superior to why. Because resale value is most definitely not important to everyone, and therefore not an objective criterion to use when assessing superiority of one product over another. Whereas battery life is. A criterion. Not the sole criterion to use when buying a phone.