• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why does Part II of Back to the Future rarely get played?

alm99

Diamond Member
I was watching Back to the Future and part III this morning, is part II the bastard child of the trilogy or something? I never did understand this?
 
eh, i think 3 is the worst of them, 2 was originally intended - 3 was just an add on to make more money once they decided that 2 was worth making, and it seems to show it
 
i always see II. I never see I or III.... there's a fundamental flaw in II as well which has always irked me, but whatever, it's a movie 😛
 
Originally posted by: alm99
What was the fatal flaw in 2?

there's a paradox where marty should have ceased to exist the way he is as soon as new biff gave old biff the sports almanac
 
Originally posted by: alm99
I was watching Back to the Future and part III this morning, is part II the bastard child of the trilogy or something? I never did understand this?

They played part 2 before part 3 last night. I caught the end of it. But I agree..it is the bastart child of the trilogy because it isn't as good as 1 or 3.
 
2 was on last night.

im tempted to call '3' a money-grab, but they filmed it during '2' (kinda like what they did with the last 2 movies of the matrix series).
 
Back
Top