• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why does "no" start with 'N' in almost all languages?

I'm guessing it's one of those words that originated as soon as the first languages were developed and it just branched out with little modification.
 
Indo-European languages and cultures are some of the oldest. You can trace back most languages to the Black Sea region and the Middle East. There are some isolated languages that are very peculiar, though, and are harder to investigate the origins of.

The diminutive for mother or father in a lot of languages is similar, as well. Early, simple words that we learn in childhood tend to be the best preserved, it's usually more complex words that we borrow from other languages as loanwords and change, or develop newer compound words which evolve over time.
 
Last edited:
IndoEuropeanTree.svg
 
PenguinPower said:
No..."nai" is a romaji version of the negative for a lot of Japanese verbs. It can be used on its own from time to time, but that is not the norm.

Btw..."ない" translates to "na" "i". So it's not bastardized at all.
Click to expand...
It was just a guess because it seems as if we do phonetically bastardized many language to the Roman character.

PS. According to The Linguistic Society there are 6909 distinct languages in the word. And, the link the OP provided only shown a small sample of 62 languages, hence it is not an example of "almost all languages".

Languages are not at all uniformly distributed around the world. Just as some places are more diverse than others in terms of plant and animal species, the same goes for the distribution of languages. Out of Ethnologue’s 6,909, for instance, only 230 are spoken in Europe, while 2,197 are spoken in Asia. One area of particularly high linguistic diversity is Papua-New Guinea, where there are an estimated 832 languages spoken by a population of around 3.9 million. That makes the average number of speakers around 4,500, possibly the lowest of any area of the world. These languages belong to between 40 and 50 distinct families. Of course, the number of families may change as scholarship improves, but there is little reason to believe that these figures are radically off the mark.
Click to expand...
 
PenguinPower said:
Except...no. "Dame" or "iie" is more closely our "no." "-nai" is simply the negative form.
Click to expand...

ない　is no but is more "be nothing" than "no." It is pretty rare any way as いいえ and うん are way more common stand alone. －ない of course is negative but that isn't really "no." たべる vs たべない。
 
Except for Greek, where "yes" is pronounced like "ne" and said with a downward and to the right move of your head, while "no" is pronounced like "oshi" and accompanied by throwing your head back.

Both seemed bass ackwards to me, and took some getting used to.
 
imagoon said:
ない　is no but is more "be nothing" than "no." It is pretty rare any way as いいえ and うん are way more common stand alone. －ない of course is negative but that isn't really "no." たべる vs たべない。
Click to expand...

Makes me love english.
 
imagoon said:
ない　is no but is more "be nothing" than "no." It is pretty rare any way as いいえ and うん are way more common stand alone. －ない of course is negative but that isn't really "no." たべる vs たべない。
Click to expand...

Right. You don't say "I no eat" in english, you say "I didn't eat", "I don't eat" or something similar. Same with with your example of "taberu".

Like you mentioned "iie" is the conversational "no" in this case.
 
There was an administrator at my college that substituted for Profs once in a while. He came to one of my 3 hour classes and as a PhD in some sort of linguist science and a former CIA spook gave one the most interesting lectures about the origins of words and how you could trace the source of cultures all over the world. This also included some things that are mysteries still today, like words shared between some Asian cultures and native South American cultures.
 
imagoon said:
ない　is no but is more "be nothing" than "no." It is pretty rare any way as いいえ and うん are way more common stand alone. －ない of course is negative but that isn't really "no." たべる vs たべない。
Click to expand...

ない is not "no." It is "not" both alone and when placed after a verb or adjective.

Also, うん is "yeah" and はい is more commonly used for yes. If you say うん in the wrong setting, you're going to piss someone off.

Edit: Of course, both はいand いいえ can mean both "yes" and "no" dependent on the question asked.
 
PenguinPower said:
ない is not "no." It is "not" both alone and when placed after a verb or adjective.

Also, うん is "yeah" and はい is more commonly used for yes. If you say うん in the wrong setting, you're going to piss someone off.

Edit: Of course, both はいand いいえ can mean both "yes" and "no" dependent on the question asked.
Click to expand...

You are correct. It should have been ううん。　　うん　and ううん is informal so yes, using it with your boss will cause issues. However I have heard ない used in the same way people used to say "I have rabies uh NOOOT!" IE slang. はい　and いいえ as you mentioned are simply the formal yes and no.
 
I imagine we started with a few basic words, or general grunts at first. Given the similarity, it is apparent that specific vocalization existed before we branched out all over the world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top