• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why does Islam seem so intolerant?

Crimson

Banned
I've been quietly reading through a lot of these "us vs. them" threads, and something that seems to be tossed around is that we, as Americans, need to be more tolerant of other people's views. We often force our views onto other peoples/nations against their will. Some people go so far as to even say we DESERVED to be attacked because of our foreign policy decisions.

This got me to thinking, how can Americans be labeled as intolerant when Islam is perhaps the most intolerant religion there is on the planet? Lets think about this for a minute. In most Islamic countries, women are treated as, at best, as subservient to men.. as worst, they are treated like animals. They don't have a right to vote, be seen in public, hold jobs/careers etc.

Most foreigners are treated poorly as well.. If you are an American even in somewhat U.S. friendly countries like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, you still don't get treated very good at all.. and if you are woman, forget it..

Then look at hostile countries against the U.S. Counties like Iraq and Iran.. generally their opinion of American's is that they should be EXTERMINATED.. That's right, we should be DEAD. There is no tolerance there.. There is no even ATTEMPT at tolerance.. we deserve to die in their minds.. period. And it doesn't just stop at American's, Christians in general are treated this was as well.. Many Islamic counties support killing of Christians as well. Why do we as American's need to accept and adapt to the cultures of other countries, but they don't need to adapt or accept OUR culture? Why is it OK for them to just BAN any religious thoughts which don't fit with their thoughts, or even KILL those who don't conform?

When we visit Islamic countries we are forced to accept their customs.. Yet, if they come to OUR country, we are ALSO forced to accept THEIR ideas. Again, where is the tolerance? Could you imagine if we forced their wives to wear bikini's and thongs when they visited the U.S.? How is that any different than forcing our wives to cover their bodies when we visit their country? It amazes me how tolerance only goes in one direction.

And before anyone and goes and labels me a racist or a bigot or what have you.. I think I am completely justified that saying Islam is intolerant in general. Gallup recently did a poll of Islamic nations which asked if the people surveyed believed that the September 11th attacks were committed by Muslims. The VAST majority of counties voted overwhelmingly that they did NOT believe the attacks were carried out by Muslims. Even counties like Kuwait voted in the 85% range that they did NOT believe Muslims had anything to do with this attack. To me, thats equivalent to 85% of American's saying Timothy McVeigh had nothing to do with the Oklahoma City bombing... If Islam is so unwilling to even accept something like the 9-11 attacks could have been placed by members of their religion, then I can't see how they can be seen as tolerant..

And no, I don't believe Christians are perfect either, but like I said if you took a poll of Christians on the OK, City bombings, 85% of the people would not deny McVeigh had anything to do with it simply because he was a Christian or a Catholic. You also don't see major members of the religion condoning or involved with terrorist groups. How often do you see the Pope or a Bishop somehow implicated in an attack in Ireland for example? Never.. You don't hear the pope come out and say he thinks the Protestants "deserved" to be attacked because of their foreign policy. Sure you always have extremist groups in any religion, but I think in Islam they are much more mainstream than they are in other religions.

I could go on and on with examples but I hope I have made by point. It seems to me that Islam is perhaps one of the most intolerant religions on the planet. Disagreeing with its beliefs will get you killed at worst, and probably shunned at best. If America is so intolerant why are dozens of religions able to co-exist (INCLUDING Islam) without any major issues? Its not like Baptists are blowing up Catholic churches every other week, or killing dozens of eachother every other day. Yet this seems to happy frequently in Islamic countries..

Don't get me wrong, I don't think ALL Islamic/Muslim people are intolerant.. I think many of them are wonderful people.. but unfortunately I think the extremists control the religion in many/most Islamic countries.. I don't think Islam is intolerant in and of itself, if I remember correctly the Koran actually acknowledges Christ as a prophet, but not as the savior. Yet somehow, many Islamic counties look at Christians are people who deserve to be exterminated, not understood or accepted. It seems to go against the Koran, but nothing is ever done about it..

Anyways, I am sure this will turn into a flame fest, but I hope I somewhat made my point..
 
The problem with the countries that you list, is that religious fanaticism has become so intertwined with culture and politics that it's very difficult to even seperate them anymore.

Those countries aren't even tolerant to their own citizens. Don't like what your city Clerical council has to say? Don't say anything or risk being quieted with an Ak-47.

You are comparing two VERY different cultures/religions/governments or whatever you may call it.

 
I agree that may be the case, but why the double standard in the world press? Whens the last time you heard a journalist write about how poorly countries like I mentioned treat their own people and foreigners? Instead we hear about how we somehow deserved the attacks because we force our views on these countries..

I'm sorry, but there are SOME universal rights and wrongs. Men and women being equal for example is a universal RIGHT.. its not something a religion or country should be able to force upon its people. I know many will disagree with that, but we never hear stories about how Iraq deserves to be bombed by the United States for their treatment of women and christians.. Its frustrating.
 
Intolerance is fundamental to islam. Look at the way they treat their women. It's a midieval culture that's highly jelous of western culture and ls willing to decapitate and destroy in an attempt to preserve it's most radical version of the koran. They simply need to be exterminated as a culture. As in the dodo.
 


<< The problem with the countries that you list, is that religious fanaticism has become so intertwined with culture and politics that it's very difficult to even seperate them anymore.

Those countries aren't even tolerant to their own citizens. Don't like what your city Clerical council has to say? Don't say anything or risk being quieted with an Ak-47.

You are comparing two VERY different cultures/religions/governments or whatever you may call it.
>>



Very good point. In fact, everyone here so far has made good points about Islam. The extreme parts of the Islamic faith are now a part of Arab culture in every Arab coutry in the world and that makes it a big problem.

I have an uncle who used to be a missionary. He once attended a confrence open to all religions in New York. The purpose of the confrence was to discuss what each could do to help improve relations between the religions. Each stood up and discussed at length what they wanted to do to help the relations. When it came time for the leaders of Islam to speak, they didn't even stand just simply stated that Islam was the only true religion and that all other religions represent the infidels.

And this was back in the 70s. This is a real problem weather people want to admit it or not.
 
Same reason Koresh was a freak..because alot of fundamentalist religious zealots are nuts whether they be Islamic or Christian..

The Islamic revolution swept through the middle east quite rapidly and non-believers or infidels weren't tolerated. The idea was to convert as many people as you could by peace or sword. They swept through Africa, across the Mediterranean Sea and all the way through Portugal and Spain. If it weren't for the Franks fending them off there would probably be no Christianity today. Christianity was an option to people in Europe whereas Islam was mandatory in the middle east. It is one of the few "State Religions". They believed that if they died while spreading the word of Mohammed than they would get their 77 virgins.

Islam split up into a couple branches following Mohammed's death..One of them was the "fundamentalist cancer-like" scourge that killed anything it couldn't convert..the one that swept into Europe and the other was a milder more peaceful form of Islam that most practice today.
 


<< Whens the last time you heard a journalist write about how poorly countries like I mentioned treat their own people and foreigners? >>



Not sure what select newspapers/websites you read, I've seen many an acticle talking about the piss poor civil rights in other countries. China, Somolia, Cuba, the Former Soviet Union, ect all have had substantial coverage on the very intolerant governments/self appointed governments that rule them.

I think you are just catching wind of the stench that has arisen since 9/11. Controversy sells. Publish a controversial article and it gets seen. Everyone talks about it. I don't think that finger pointing is any worse per say, it's just that it's inflamed and we are extra sensitive to it in light of recent events.
 


<< Not sure what select newspapers/websites you read, I've seen many an acticle talking about the piss poor civil rights in other countries. China, Somolia, Cuba, the Former Soviet Union, ect all have had substantial coverage on the very intolerant governments/self appointed governments that rule them. >>



Note that all of those countries you mentioned (Except Somalia maybe) are not Islamic.. It seems like Islam is off limits from criticism right now.
 
"The problem with the countries that you list, is that religious fanaticism has become so intertwined with culture and politics that
it's very difficult to even seperate them anymore."

agreed. islam is not the problem. islam is far more tolerant of different faiths than christianity. there are specific suras which
lay out the groundrules for co-existence between the 'peoples of the book'. islamic extremism is faring better than christian
extremism of ages past.

back in the day, when european christians were bating others for a fight, they exported their militant orthodox to people far
and wide in search of better world.
 


<< Note that all of those countries you mentioned (Except Somalia maybe) are not Islamic.. It seems like Islam is off limits from criticism right now. >>

Whoops. I misread your post and thought you wanted exceptions to Islam. My bad.

As for why don't hear about journalists writing about the conditions in these countries, well, maybe cases like Danny Ferry(spl?) and the 4 international journalists that were all killed is somewhat a deterrent. Would *you* be overly willing to go write a news article if you knew that *at least* 5 other of your comrads were slaughtered while on the job? Most reporters I've seen from CNN and whatnot were actually reporting from the borders of other countries. Kind of hard to report on something when you aren't even in the country.

I'm not trying to defend Islam. Please don't think that. I have the same disgust twords many of it's members that you do. But, I do have to remember though that many of these issues go much deeper than *just* religion.
 


<< "The problem with the countries that you list, is that religious fanaticism has become so intertwined with culture and politics that
it's very difficult to even seperate them anymore."

agreed. islam is not the problem. islam is far more tolerant of different faiths than christianity. there are specific suras which
lay out the groundrules for co-existence between the 'peoples of the book'. islamic extremism is faring better than christian
extremism of ages past.

back in the day, when european christians were bating others for a fight, they exported their militant orthodox to people far
and wide in search of better world.
>>



Is this 'my Superman will beat up your Spiderman' game?

I agree with the first quote. The intertwine between religion and politics is like a self-feeding monster. Politicians/rulers bribe their countrymen with religious rethorics. I know this because I grew up in such a country. Corrupt officials would donate their ill-gotten, stolen-from-public money to build mosques and madrasah; when they are questioned about their financial dealings, they would call one Haj from this mosque or another ustad from that mosque to scare away any inquiry by charging them 'anti-islam'. No, this is not particular to muslim countries. But as of now, this problem is systemic in most muslim countries.

I am not sure who says this: 'Your life is your best apologetics'.




 


<< "The problem with the countries that you list, is that religious fanaticism has become so intertwined with culture and politics that
it's very difficult to even seperate them anymore."

agreed. islam is not the problem. islam is far more tolerant of different faiths than christianity.
>>




Oh come on. How many Islamic states have freedom of religion? Now, how many Christian dominated countries have freedom of religion? Thats too easy.



<< there are specific suras which lay out the groundrules for co-existence between the 'peoples of the book'. islamic extremism is faring better than christian extremism of ages past. >>



I'm only conscerned with judging the people alive, not people who lived in the middle ages. Stay in the present.



<< back in the day, when european christians were bating others for a fight, they exported their militant orthodox to people far
and wide in search of better world.
>>



And once again, Stay in the PRESENT. The christians are hundreds of years out of that way of thinking. Do not judge a religion by its past, judge it my its present state.

And in today's world, Islam has the most violent and intolerant people in religon today. There is no debating that.
 
Tolerance - its what makes western culture superior in comparison; or atleast, civilized...

Its also dangerous for people to associate (read: confuse) religion with ethnic heritage... Muslims and Jews seem to do it all the time, and its annoying...

Good Muslims, those who have not yet been blinded by hatred for one reason or another, need to realize that their faith is headed down the wrong path, globally, and if not, somewhere down the line people are going to realize that...
 


<< Oh come on. How many Islamic states have freedom of religion? Now, how many Christian dominated countries have freedom of religion? Thats too easy. >>



At the same time, there are lots of Christians who would like nothing more than to make the US a Christian state.
 
Crimson,

Excellent post. I consider myself something of an amateur expert on Islam because Ive studied it for about two years now. During those two years Ive waivered from almost wanting to convert to revulsion. Islam, like all other religions, is very complex, but I believe there are a couple gneralizations we can make:

-Most Muslims in the US are very tolerant, peace loving people-- in fact, many of the best people I know are US Muslims.
-Many of the Islamic residents of the Middle East are totally different from US Muslims.
-Islam *is* a very restrictive, psychologically difficult religion-- both for its opponents and its practitioners

Although I dont remember the exact numbers from the polls, I think its safe to say a LOT of Muslims in the ME hate the US. That being said, a lot of Muslims *are* peace loving, kind people.

The sad truth is, most Islamic countries have absolutely terrible education systems-- unless you are in the ruling class and can afford to send your kids to the UK or US for a Harvard degree. This lack of eduation contributes greatly to the "hate" the US gets from these countries.

Many of the revivalist "Islamists" exploit this lack of education in order to reach their own political objectives.

If the current generation of "Islamists" have their way, I think the West will have to eventually go to war to protect itself-- let us all hope that fundimentalists are crushed before this happens.
 
Plain and simple, because the minority of IDIOTS that practice Islam are the ones getting the press. There no story in Mohammed simply going to work, then coming home and being happy to do so.
 
Yeah, those Muslims sure are intolerant.... not like us Christians, who gave us such tolerant figures as Adolf Hitler and such wonderfully tolerant things like the crusades aimed at wiping out the infidel Muslims from the Holy Land. 😕

Lets face it, no religion (or lack of religion as the Communists have shown) has a monopoly on tolerance. Islam is a religion that has it's rules and scriptures, just like every other religion. The question is how the scriptures are interpreted. Every religion can be twisted into just about anything you want.

Lets not be to quick to forget that perhaps the hate prevalent in many Arab countries for the Western world can (at least in part) be justified given the actions of "the west" in their lands over the last century and a half. Even now, we're willing to do just about anything to make sure our dependence on oil is served. It doesn't matter what tirant or despot we support, so long as the region is "stable", our interests are served, and all is well.... or did someone perhaps forget that it was the West that armed and supported the likes of Saddam, Gaddafi, Amin etc etc?
 


<< Yeah, those Muslims sure are intolerant.... not like us Christians, who gave us such tolerant figures as Adolf Hitler and such wonderfully tolerant things like the crusades aimed at wiping out the infidel Muslims from the Holy Land. 😕 >>



Yes you are confused just like your happy face. Deal with the here and now, not the past.

In the here and now Muslim states do not practice religious freedom, Christian dominated countries and Jewish countries do.

Take all the shots you want at Israel, Islam is not outlawed like Judaism and Christianty are in Islamic states.

Lets face it, no religion (or lack of religion as the Communists have shown) has a monopoly on tolerance. [/i] >>



I'd be happy with just a basic level of tolerance but the vast majorioty of them don't even have that.



<< Islam is a religion that has it's rules and scriptures, just like every other religion. The question is how the scriptures are interpreted. Every religion can be twisted into just about anything you want. >>




Islam has no central power thereofore it cannot moderize many ancient myths. If you read the Koran, it is painfully obvious that it was written in anger and is very descriptive about current events and how past battles should be avenged. Only Islam has a derogatory remark for people not of the faith, Infidels. And they still use it to this day.

It also most importantly, has no excommunication, no explusion. Every wondered why no one from the Islamic faith has dared to say that Bin Laden is no longer a Muslim for his acts? Because there is no Islam law that says there are acts that are serious enough to warrent explusion.



<< Lets not be to quick to forget that perhaps the hate prevalent in many Arab countries for the Western world can (at least in part) be justified given the actions of "the west" in their lands over the last century and a half. >>



NO. You are NOT going to get away with justifying September 11th. NOTHING America or anyone else in Europe Justfies that Slaughter and you should ASHAMED of yourself for trying to justify it.

How Dare you.

Should America be "justified" for what the Arabs did in Wars? How about the Ottoman Empire? Should the US be free to blow up 3,000 Arab Civilizans because 80 years ago America was at war with them?

Man, go out and read some books, you are really out of the loop.



<< Even now, we're willing to do just about anything to make sure our dependence on oil is served. It doesn't matter what tirant or despot we support, so long as the region is "stable", our interests are served, and all is well.... or did someone perhaps forget that it was the West that armed and supported the likes of Saddam, Gaddafi, Amin etc etc? >>



My friend, you REALLY need to do some reading. Your facts are so off its sickening. Russia and China Armed Saddam, we were under fire by Russian weapons NOT American weapons. Gaddafi buys Russia and Chinese arms as well and recently purchased 20 North Korean Billistic Missiles capable of Hitting Italy and Southern France.

And your Sickening Attempt at trying to justify the September 11 attacks shows your callusness for those innocent Americans shose lives were taken and families destroyed.

:|
 


<< Only Islam has a derogatory remark for people not of the faith, Infidels. And they still use it to this day. >>


I'll be damned...I wouldn't have believed it if I didn't look it up but this is true 😕

From dictionary.com:

Note: Infidel is used by English writers to translate the equivalent word used Mohammedans in speaking of Christians and other disbelievers in Mohammedanism.

and that Arabic word is &Ccedil;&aacute;&szlig;&Ccedil;&Yacute;&Ntilde; --If you have Arab text. Otherwise it'll look like Cabcyn
 
Perspective . . . it is always easy to level a negative critique against your foes . . . it's all you can perceive. Unlike some ATOTs who abhor history, I love it. It tells us where we come from and how we got here . . . it also illustrates royal fudge-jobs that shouldn't be repeated.

History of the evolution of Christian violence/war doctrine from the beginning to present

I really hate excerpting this piece b/c it's a great survey of Christian doctrine and its relationship to the State . . . if you don't click any links it can be read in less than 5 minutes.

For the warrior Christian caste, Catholic philosophy concedes to the State the full natural right of war, whether defensive, ... (or) offensive where it finds it necessary to take the initiative in the application of force; or punishment in the infliction of punishment for evil done against itself... (Macksey, 108). . . . no offense intended towards the non-Catholics.

For the lambs, The assertion that "certain Jews at the time of Christ revolted against the Jewish community and followed Jesus" is not less false than the claim "that the Jews had their origin in a revolt of certain Egyptians." Celsus and those who agree with him will not be able to cite a single act of rebellion on the part of the Christians. If a revolt had indeed given rise to the Christian community, if Christians took their origins from the Jews, who were allowed to take up arms in defense of their possessions and to kill their enemies, the Christian Lawgiver would not have made homicide absolutely forbidden. He would not have taught that his disciples were never justified in taking such action against a man even if he were the greatest wrongdoer. [Jesus] considered it contrary to his divinely inspired legislation to approve any kind of homicide whatsoever. If Christians had started with a revolt, they would never have submitted to the kind of peaceful laws which permitted them to be slaughtered "like sheep" (Psalm 44:11) and which made them always incapable of taking vengeance on their persecutors because they followed the law of gentleness and love. (Against Celsus 3.8)


baaa
 
syzygy

islam is far more tolerant of different faiths than christianity. there are specific suras which
lay out the groundrules for co-existence between the 'peoples of the book'. islamic extremism is faring better than christian extremism of ages past.


I am curious how you reconcile that with what is happening in northern Nigeria.

An example in case you are not acquainted with that situation. It is only a starting point to learn, but an interesting read.
Sharia Crisis in Nigeria
 
"My friend, you REALLY need to do some reading. Your facts are so off its sickening. Russia and China Armed Saddam, we were under fire by Russian weapons NOT American weapons. Gaddafi buys Russia and Chinese arms as well and recently purchased 20 North Korean Billistic Missiles capable of Hitting Italy and Southern France."

The united states gave Iraq a lot of weapons back in the 80s. If you dont believe me, Ill get you some links.
 


<< Perspective . . . it is always easy to level a negative critique against your foes . . . it's all you can perceive. Unlike some ATOTs who abhor history, I love it. It tells us where we come from and how we got here . . . it also illustrates royal fudge-jobs that shouldn't be repeated. >>




LOL I love history but I don't let it be an excuse for present day terrorists as you do




<< History of the evolution of Christian violence/war doctrine from the beginning to present

I really hate excerpting this piece b/c it's a great survey of Christian doctrine and its relationship to the State . . . if you don't click any links it can be read in less than 5 minutes.

For the warrior Christian caste, Catholic philosophy concedes to the State the full natural right of war, whether defensive, ... (or) offensive where it finds it necessary to take the initiative in the application of force; or punishment in the infliction of punishment for evil done against itself... (Macksey, 108). . . . no offense intended towards the non-Catholics.

For the lambs, The assertion that "certain Jews at the time of Christ revolted against the Jewish community and followed Jesus" is not less false than the claim "that the Jews had their origin in a revolt of certain Egyptians." Celsus and those who agree with him will not be able to cite a single act of rebellion on the part of the Christians. If a revolt had indeed given rise to the Christian community, if Christians took their origins from the Jews, who were allowed to take up arms in defense of their possessions and to kill their enemies, the Christian Lawgiver would not have made homicide absolutely forbidden. He would not have taught that his disciples were never justified in taking such action against a man even if he were the greatest wrongdoer. [Jesus] considered it contrary to his divinely inspired legislation to approve any kind of homicide whatsoever. If Christians had started with a revolt, they would never have submitted to the kind of peaceful laws which permitted them to be slaughtered "like sheep" (Psalm 44:11) and which made them always incapable of taking vengeance on their persecutors because they followed the law of gentleness and love. (Against Celsus 3.8)


baaa
>>




What interesting about this little piece is it fails to acknolwedge the steps Christians have taken towards improving themselves (Vatican II) and the West's abhorance of going to war.

Tell me, when was the last Christian holy war fought? LOL I know you will dodge this question as well but its still a valid one.

And I see you dodged every single piece of fact everyone here has provided about the state of religious freedom or even freedom as a whole in Muslim States. So typical of you BaliBabyDoc, ducking the facts given by trying to change the subject.

Tell us, what steps have present Muslims made towards peace with other religions in say, the past century? I'm sure you will run away from this question as you do from the rest posed to you.

If you really want to be taken serious little buddy, start debating what people bring to the table, don't dodge it.
 
Back
Top